Inorganic Chemistry [GAME OVER, SCUM WIN]

[Flubbernugget]

Pressure

[mastin2]

I'm back here, but don't have the time to read at the moment.

Mod: V/LA for the next two weeks or so.

College finals and whatnot, including me here trying to, y'know. Not totally and utterly fail my class which I'm on the verge of.
Particularly, I shouldn't have even been visiting the site on Tuesdays (today), or Thursdays. (But here I am because I am a MORON. At least I'm smart enough not to tackle the nine pages?)

[Cerberus v666]

Pressure

I already addressed that "reason," and quite dismissively. Putting pressure on a player through votes seems like something one would do to a sum read. It seems it would take some serious mental gynnastics to argue that you had a scum read on that player at that time, given that you didn't actually express said scum read or the reason for it. I'm pretty sure we're just going to disagree on the value of that play for town at this stage of the game, and as I've said repeatedly, its not damning enough to vote, but it is damning enough for me to not really mind lynching you today.

[Cerberus v666]

Also, consider my vote to be on whoever has the lowest post count accounting for V/LA. I'll go home and figure out who that is in a few hours, but I'm not a fan of letting lurkers lurk.

[hiplop]

I agree that gorkingtons replace out looks scummier than most. I'm not sure thats enough for me to want his head, though?

I scum read this

eh, i dont think we should dwell on it

Usually when someone misrep-votes me, they’re town. Your vote feels similar.

I appreciate the sentiment, you scummy bastard.

and in fact I agree, flubbernugget seems oppurtunistic as hell.

VOTE: fluber

[vezokpiraka]

Also, consider my vote to be on whoever has the lowest post count accounting for V/LA. I'll go home and figure out who that is in a few hours, but I'm not a fan of letting lurkers lurk.

Ok. Let me just say I'll be perpetually V/LA and never post.


This post reeks of bullshit. What does lurking have to do with V/LA? You either lurk or you are V/LA and either post extremely rarely or not at all. Coming into the thread and saying you'll be V/LA for 2 weeks because you have other stuff to do is not a V/LA.

[Cerberus v666]

...We have a couple players in the game who have been vla for a couple days of this very young day. I said my vote was on whoever had the lowest post count. It makes sense that someone who was on vla most of the time would have a post count which is not reflective od their activity. I was merely saying that I'm going to distinguish between lurkers who claimed to be present, and those who claimwd they wouldn't be around at all, and account for that in who I vote for.

[Flubbernugget]

...We have a couple players in the game who have been vla for a couple days of this very young day. I said my vote was on whoever had the lowest post count. It makes sense that someone who was on vla most of the time would have a post count which is not reflective od their activity. I was merely saying that I'm going to distinguish between lurkers who claimed to be present, and those who claimwd they wouldn't be around at all, and account for that in who I vote for.

Lets talk about the vote you have in play right now

[Cerberus v666]

Which vote? I haven't voted for anyone yet, and won't be dking so until I go home and check post counts and look for content in said posts.

[ika]

Which vote? I haven't voted for anyone yet, and won't be dking so until I go home and check post counts and look for content in said posts.

I think that what hes refering to.

[Mac]

im behind alot, but i have a day off on thursday to crack at this.

One thing i am interested in is mastin's read on me. What is going on there?

[Cerberus v666]

/confirm

so if we're not a loser we're modkilled?

^scrub sonic

/

Shaq

Illuminati confirmed

VOTE: Shakira

yea a parallel universe where they were never born

these last few pages seemed to accomplish nothing

I'll do a reread tomorrow to see any useful posts that I missed.

This is Flames entire ISO.
Lurking=bad.

VOTE: Vote: Flames

[Bins]

Also, consider my vote to be on whoever has the lowest post count accounting for V/LA. I'll go home and figure out who that is in a few hours, but I'm not a fan of letting lurkers lurk.

wtf.

that's void of scumhunting 100%

[Cerberus v666]

Also, consider my vote to be on whoever has the lowest post count accounting for V/LA. I'll go home and figure out who that is in a few hours, but I'm not a fan of letting lurkers lurk.

wtf.

that's void of scumhunting 100%

Yes, because you can engage with and catch people who don't talk.

[Bins]

yes but it allows you to get away w/ the same argument over and over again

anyone can do that

[Cerberus v666]

yes but it allows you to get away w/ the same argument over and over again

anyone can do that

I'm not certain what you mean? Are you trying to say the entire game is going to be lurksacks and never post and thus I can just keep saying "OH LOOK AT HIM HE'S LURKING LYNCH HIM!!!" over and over again?

[Bins]

no im saying theres always going to be a person with the least amount of posts

[Bins]

also quality over content

i mean im one to talk

i usually have the most posts in a game but im fluffy as shit and i quad post like crazy
some people (mastin, etc) like long walls with multiquotes

like seriously

[Cerberus v666]

Oh. I think you're misunderstanding me, or deliberately misrepresenting what I'm saying. I think the first though. I do prefer that when we get to the endgame, there be no lurkers who have given us nothing to analyze, but I said earlier, for day 1, when we have NO information, I prefer lynching lurkers over going off of the ignorant reads of ignorant people who likely think they're not ignorant.

p-edit: I also said I would note content to. Do you see any content in flames' posts?

[Flubbernugget]

Bins I have you as null but want to town read you because last time I played with you I was a tunnelfuck of derp

You should vote cerb so I can town read you when he flips scum

[Ankamius]

Oh. I think you're misunderstanding me, or deliberately misrepresenting what I'm saying. I think the first though. I do prefer that when we get to the endgame, there be no lurkers who have given us nothing to analyze, but I said earlier, for day 1, when we have NO information, I prefer lynching lurkers over going off of the ignorant reads of ignorant people who likely think they're not ignorant.

p-edit: I also said I would note content to. Do you see any content in flames' posts?

Lurkers also tend to give the least amount of information to work with day 2 when you kill them.

[Cerberus v666]

Oh. I think you're misunderstanding me, or deliberately misrepresenting what I'm saying. I think the first though. I do prefer that when we get to the endgame, there be no lurkers who have given us nothing to analyze, but I said earlier, for day 1, when we have NO information, I prefer lynching lurkers over going off of the ignorant reads of ignorant people who likely think they're not ignorant.

p-edit: I also said I would note content to. Do you see any content in flames' posts?

Lurkers also tend to give the least amount of information to work with day 2 when you kill them.

Touche.

[Cerberus v666]

There is value in *making* lurkers talk though. *sigh* And now we're back to theory. That is where my vote is, and where it will remain unless it's needed to prevent a no lynch, or someone appears extremely scummy to me.

[Ankamius]

So what you're saying is that you have no scumreads, is that right?

[Cerberus v666]

Did you not read my post earlier? I posted a list of players, in order of towniness to me. Those at the bottom, would be the ones I think are scummy. But nobody has done anything that seems scummy enough to justify voting for them yet.