↑ grapes wrote: ↑ TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Grapes
I am not pushing anyone bc i have no one to push ..i am stil trying to figure out my reads. i never push unless i am confident i pushing scum.
How is not paying attention scummy??? plus by that logic i am scummy every game since i tend not to pay total attention most of the time every game and in every game. Your push is kinda weak imho.
I mean yea you'd have a point if that was the only thing I was getting on you about. But it isn't.
"not paying attention," how you put it, isn't really what I was getting at. I'd hope that if you were town you'd try and find something from everyone in the playerlist that you can find to try and muster up some reads or something. You know that thing you do when you're town? You thinking ika was a separate person in the playerlist all together means that you really haven't been doing that. Otherwise you'd no. Admittedly this is a weak reason to think somebodies scum. But coupled with your play so far and a couple gripes I've had here and there, you know, the other things I brought up and asked you about in the same post that I'm assuming you decided to skim. I'm not feeling very comfortable with your slot.
@reasonably rational - Kindly stop worrying about my god damn role.
I'm a multivoter not a double voter. And I never claimed otherwise. I can't stack my votes.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: reasonably rational
VOTE: reasonably rational
After the next vote count I'm keeping the one that counts on your slot. And moving my other right back to fuzzy.
And there goes any cool fake-hammer reaction tests I could have maybe pulled off. Real pro-town play dudes.
Looking forward to when you stop making pushes trying to outguess the mod and actually read me or anyone based on play, think that'd be a bit more helpful.
It seems like the only person who stopped you from performing any "cool fake-hammer reaction tests" is yourself in expressing that one of your votes is fake. That was unnecessary and unasked for(and, btw, you didn't even actually do what I asked, it's arguable that you only unvoted one of your votes, but not the other, in which case the post here doesn't actually prove what it was supposed to prove). Don't blame me for your own incompetence.
Trying to outguess the mod? I keep hearing that sentiment here, and I think everyone that expresses it is a fucking idiot. I'm not trying to "outguess" the mod. I'm seeing what is possible within the framework created by the mod. People trying to "outguess" the mod are those that confirm alignment as a result of role, which I've already expressed is something I'm not going to do. I simply wish to know what exactly it is that we're working with. Say I have my vote sitting on somebody who you may have expresses suspicion about, but haven't yet voted, and that person gets pushed to L-2(with vezoks's vote already on them). I want to know whether or not I have to be afraid of you showing up and deciding to vote for and lynch said individual perhaps before I actually want the lynch to go through. Maybe I would prefer to just keep the votes as pressure, but not an actual lynch, to see where the conversation goes in regards to them and who speaks up in their defense and what they say.
Now, in regards to fuzzy: I don't like the specific questions he's asking. Since this is surely going to be brought up, let me address it now. Unlike my own request, he's asking for them to express hard limitations on their powers beyond simply the nature of that power. Basically, he wants to know when they won't be able to double/multi vote. I can see the benefit in what I'm asking, I'm not so sure on the benefit for town of what he's asking. Nullscum for piggybacking on my set of questions to take the opportunity to inquire about those powers in a fashion that would be a fairly decent red flag if this issue weren't already focused on my interest in the votes.
In regards to what Drixx said about grapes claiming to be unable to stack their votes: Grapes didn't do that. I don't know why Drixx said they did. It's arguable they IMPLIED being unable to stack their votes by their resistance to telling us more, but they absolutely did not claim to be unable to stack their votes at any point.
OH, also
UNVOTE: . You also just displayed that you could have single voted initially(barring a compulsory "first vote of the day must be a double vote" clause or something), but chose not to. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you're not terrible enough as scum to have drawn unnecessary attention to yourself by making multiple votes when you didn't actually have a reason to.
Hmm. I'm left with a bit of a quandary now. grapes was absolutely at the top of my scum list, but has now fallen to nullscum at worst, really just a slot I'm suspicious of, but not suspicious enough to actually vote. I'll need to discuss this with Drixx and figure out how we're feeling about things.
-Cerb
