Inorganic Chemistry [GAME OVER, SCUM WIN]

[Jaqen Hghar]

A man is actually holding two very separate scenarios to have the possibility of being true at the same time. It's an either or. The one a man is pushing is the one with the most in thread evidence. And, why shouldn't he? Because it isn't popular? A man knows that 95% of the players here can't find scum agenda in thread without a scum flip even with flashing neon signs pointing it out. That's fine. What's not fine is the pigheaded foolishness these self same players are exhibiting game after game when they know they aren't having this ability.

[Jaqen Hghar]

To put it more plainly. You know I have a great track record in finding scum and their agendas. My rival this game-Sonic- I even said so. You know I'm town or you wouldn't be calling me mislynch bait. Yet you still call me confbias and refuse to open your mind to the possibility I'm actually right, based solely on two slots that have plenty of reasons to doubt their towniness because they investigated ok. Even though scum would know they're being investigated so the investigation can be effed with. Where's the common sense in that?

[vezokpiraka]

Are we going to no lynch again?

[vezokpiraka]

Are we going to no lynch again?

[Jaqen Hghar]

It would take it out of a MYLO situation later on. Which isn't horrible. But I hope not.

[Cerberus v666]

I hope you're not referring to me as one of those pigheaded players. You certainly don't have enough experience with me to make such a determination.

And no, it's fine that you're pushing the scenario that you're pushing. There isn't any in thread evidence of said scenario though. There are neutral things which you have presented in the context of the scenario you're concerned about, but that in thread evidence doesn't exist to a neutral observer.

pedit: Actually, I have very little faith in your ability to find scum, because at least 3 out of your 4 original suspects, are 100% town to me. Two have flipped, and I'm the third. And the fourth investigated as town, but, as we're discussing, that isn't 100%.

I am completely open to the possibility that you're right. You know the reason why I was listing out that whole scenario and the timeline for it? it was so tomorrow, if we mislynched today and sums kill went through tonight, i could push for the lynch of someone in the line of people who've been investigated and done the investigating, on the basis of the need to confirm part of the chain before we get to D5 and the instant loss that I presented as a possibility.

I even said earlier in the game, that I viewed your scenario as possible, but the key was to ensure we lynched in the chain BEFORE we got the point where not doing so would have lost us the game. The difference between us is just that I dont' tihnk we should do so before it gives as much information as possible, so we should do it as late as possible, and you felt it should be done as early as possible, to resolve that question.

[Cerberus v666]

well, considering we don't have enough votes among those talking to lynch anyone but Aristophanes, and vezok says he refuses to vote Aristophanes, if nobody else shows up, yes, we are going to no lynch today.

[Cerberus v666]

Anti, VC please? We're getting down to the wire here, and it would be good to know for sure where things stand.

[sthar8]

VOTE: Kari

better of the lurker wagons. I'll try to be around in a couple of hours to check if that doesn't work out.

Cerb, can you get an avatar please? It's hard to distinguish at a glance which posts are yours and jacky's.

[Lying Cat]

VOTE: Kari

better of the lurker wagons. I'll try to be around in a couple of hours to check if that doesn't work out.

Cerb, can you get an avatar please? It's hard to distinguish at a glance which posts are yours and jacky's.

Fucking AAAAAAAARGH

slammed at work= can't figure out how to log out apparently.

VOTE: Kari

[Cerberus v666]

it's pretty unlikely I'm going to get an avatar,but it's not impossible.

Hmm. Pretty interesting how this is playing out. Kari, that was kinda a terrible post. Just drop in when people start voting you again, and point out that the other wagon is bigger. Hmm.

If I end up voting you that will be why.

[Kari]

i dont really care. its saving anti from having to find my replacement, which isnt a bad idea.

[Wickedestjr]

I think this is it;

Aristophanes - 6 (Flubbernugget, T S O, Kari, Sonic Boom, Constantine, Cerberus v666)
Kari - 6 (Aristophanes, vezokpiraka, Nachomamma8, Wickedestjr, Jaqen Hghar, Lying Cat)
Wickedestjr - 1 (mastin2)

Not Voting: ika


Three hours left, roughly. I should be around when deadline hits.

[Cerberus v666]

i dont really care. its saving anti from having to find my replacement, which isnt a bad idea.

Well, both slots are up for replacement, so whichever one goes it saves anti the trouble of finding one of his 2 needed replacements. Welcome back wicked. Did you have a preferred choice between kari and Ari? idon't recall.

[Cerberus v666]

Oh, of course, it's Kari, the one your'e voting. sorry, I missed that.

[Nachomamma8]

Vote: Aristophanes

[Cerberus v666]

Hmm. 7 to 5 now. Why the change of heart Nacho?

[Nachomamma8]

6 to 6, three hours late.

[Nachomamma8]

left*

[Cerberus v666]

And both slots are equally likely to be scum to you?

[Cerberus v666]

Or is one scum, one null, but you don't mind lynching the null if it prevents a no lynch?

[Jaqen Hghar]

I hope you're not referring to me as one of those pigheaded players. You certainly don't have enough experience with me to make such a determination.

And no, it's fine that you're pushing the scenario that you're pushing. There isn't any in thread evidence of said scenario though. There are neutral things which you have presented in the context of the scenario you're concerned about, but that in thread evidence doesn't exist to a neutral observer.

pedit: Actually, I have very little faith in your ability to find scum, because at least 3 out of your 4 original suspects, are 100% town to me. Two have flipped, and I'm the third. And the fourth investigated as town, but, as we're discussing, that isn't 100%.

I am completely open to the possibility that you're right. You know the reason why I was listing out that whole scenario and the timeline for it? it was so tomorrow, if we mislynched today and sums kill went through tonight, i could push for the lynch of someone in the line of people who've been investigated and done the investigating, on the basis of the need to confirm part of the chain before we get to D5 and the instant loss that I presented as a possibility.

I even said earlier in the game, that I viewed your scenario as possible, but the key was to ensure we lynched in the chain BEFORE we got the point where not doing so would have lost us the game. The difference between us is just that I dont' tihnk we should do so before it gives as much information as possible, so we should do it as late as possible, and you felt it should be done as early as possible, to resolve that question.

It's there. You're just willfully ignoring it or are scum yourself.

Fudge it. Hammer time

VOTE: Aristopanes

[Aristophanes]

Welp, that's a thing.

I should probably say stuff...

[Nachomamma8]

Or is one scum, one null, but you don't mind lynching the null if it prevents a no lynch?

They're both sort of scummy but I have doubts either will flip scum.

[Antihero]

Final Vote Count of Day 3

Aristophanes - 8 (Flubbernugget, T S O, Kari, Sonic Boom, Fluminator, Cerberus v666, Nachomamma8, Jaqen Hghar)

Kari - 4 (Aristophanes, vezokpiraka, Wickedestjr, Lying Cat)
Wickedestjr - 1 (mastin2)

Not Voting: ika