And I was wrong on him. But being wrong does not make me scum. If it did, then you'd be scum for how hard BOTH heads of yours pushed hiplop, when hiplop was hilariously obviously town. Obviously, you know that you're town. Therefore you know that being wrong on a read you're certain of is not by itself indicative of alignment. (No, being wrong about a player being town is not worse than being wrong about a player being scum. Being wrong about an alignment is being wrong about an alignment. See also the below.) You have to look at the reason
why
, the WAY the wrongness was, to find the driving motivation that lead to the incorrect conclusion, and it's by that metric you can tell.
Basic mafia 101 here.
↑ T S O wrote:TSO got the Cop, debated whether to hit Wicked or Flubber, happily hit Wicked. Town.
UNVOTE: Wickedestjr.
TSO's town.
If TSO were scum, he'd never claim the cop. Why? Because with the cop inventor dead, there'd be nobody in the game who would know he was the one who got it. Therefore, there would be no obligation to claim the result, as in prior days. "But why not claim the result for the towncred?"
Simple, really. Because the plan, as it was yesterday, was to
lynch the last recipient of the cop invention
. I.e., TSO. By claiming it, he's painting a big giant red flag over his head screaming, "LYNCH ME!" Now I admittedly haven't seen TSO's scumgame in a while, but I'm pretty sure he's not the type to pull such a gambit where he deliberately puts himself at risk of being lynched, JUST for the sake of MAYBE getting towncred. Risk-reward benefit along with what I'm presuming is a massive ego as scum (TSO's free to correct me if I'm wrong) would both pressure him into being the type to value his life such that he wouldn't carelessly throw caution to the wind and be so reckless as to do that.
Even if I'm wrong. Even IF TSO is scum, who thought that was worth it. He'd never dare to claim an innocent on his own partner. Heck, claiming an innocent outside the chain is itself a large gambit if he's scum, but on a partner? I just don't see it. It's like an Inu-Yasha 3-x Innocent Child ploy in scope. Yeah, that's probably not the best example given that it actually, well, worked, but it VERY easily could have backfired...and almost did. Twice, if I recall. Maybe more times than that! It relied on everything going right (it did), on town acting exactly as they needed to (they almost didn't), and so on and so forth. Basically, it was an incredibly-high risk for something that produced a decent reward, but which I don't see any sane scum player realistically considering trying to repeat.
Thus, by proxy, Wicked is town too.
I'm...not really sure where I want to vote, now, though. Like, my ika and vezok suspicions are
there
, but they were in a whole 'nother league compared to Wicked. And with Wicked town, that means there needs to be at least one scum on the Aristophanes wagon (because, I repeat, LC is town), and I haven't the slightest clue who it'd be. (I mean, there are certain people I think it wouldn't be, but not really people I think it would be.
)
I'll need to do more analysis after I get caught up.