Newbie 1633: The Daily Show-A Retrospective - GAME OVER

[Dierfire]

@Axwell

VOTE: BlueBloodedToffee for supporting such a terrible team

What do you think of his play thus far?

[fferyllt]

necargoface replaces Markin. Please welcome him!

[Dierfire]

@Yuriko

30 is good but 32 not

What was good about 30? What was not good about 32?

[necargoface]

Hola! I am necargoface, and let's get a few things out of the way:

-This is like my 4th mafia game in the last 5 years.
-I am generally lazy.
-I generally like wagons (probably because I'm lazy)

So, by skimming (because I'm lazy) we have an L-2 because... someone doesn't like RVS's? Is that a legit reason to put someone at L-1? At least we didn't get an intent to hammer (because that would just be hilariously bad).

So, here's my RV (although not actually an RV because his vote was odd and somewhat scummy):

VOTE: Honest Because his avatar is ironic. That's L-1.

PEDIT: Soooo, we HAD an L-2 because someone didn't like RVS's. Now it's because of a naked vote that's quite odd. Makes sense.

[YurikoJasmine]

Really? Putting someone at l-1 because of RV?

[Draynth]

@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.

[Draynth]

I guess that I consider it helpful to Town, but it's not strongly indicative of alignment.

Ok thanks.

@Axwell

VOTE: BlueBloodedToffee for supporting such a terrible team

What do you think of his play thus far?

I wish he, along with about 3 others, would post something :/

Also I forgot to say welcome to Necargoface!

[ZeroSummer]

30 is good but 32 not

32 was fixing a typo in 30?

[necargoface]

@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.

Thank you for putting "RV" in quotation marks, because it was not really an RV. Definitely not actually an RV. Do you guys read what I put in my quotation marks?

Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.

[Dierfire]

Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.

It sounds as though you think that he would flip Town. Do you?

[YurikoJasmine]

You know if you were voting for a reason there's no need for you to name it RV. The only reason you should do so is because you know your reason sucks so you cover it up with a "RV" label should people ask about it in later games. And now when people frown on you you quickly defend your vote like he's your scumread all along.

vote: necargoface

[fferyllt]

Vote Count 1.3

Indecision 2000

Honest

(4): ZeroSummer, Dierfire, BlueBloodedToffee, necargoface

BlueBloodedToffee

(2): Honest, Axwell

ZeroSummer

(1): MasonP

necargoface

(1): YurikoJasmine

Not Voting

(1): Draynth

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.


Deadline: August 10, Midnight US Eastern Time.

Countdown: (expired on 2015-08-09 21:00:00)

Mod Notes:

-

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Anyone planning on stating intent to hammer?

Just to be clear, that is not a vote, but an intent to vote.

[Draynth]

Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered.

That's an awful reason for your vote

[Draynth]

@BBT I don't think he should be lynched. I can see the reasoning behind your vote but I just dont see it as a good choice for a lynch right now.

[YurikoJasmine]

Anyone planning on stating intent to hammer?

Just to be clear, that is not a vote, but an intent to vote.

Nope

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Why not?

[necargoface]

@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.

Something else to note: I don't have a problem with putting people at L-1. I have a problem with a stupid reason putting people at L-1. Not liking RVS's? That's a stupid reason. One post in the whole game so far with no context whatsoever and no actual input to the game? Better reason. I'm not moving my vote until Honest posts and actually puts something into the game.

Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered.

That's an awful reason for your vote

I am voting because he has posted once this entire game with a naked, contextless, useless post, and has not responded to any of the resulting backlash.

Why not?

Because we shouldn't hammer Honest until he responds to all the backlash he's getting.

[necargoface]

You know if you were voting for a reason there's no need for you to name it RV. The only reason you should do so is because you know your reason sucks so you cover it up with a "RV" label should people ask about it in later games. And now when people frown on you you quickly defend your vote like he's your scumread all along.

vote: necargoface

I like RV's. I didn't get to make one in the early stages. I made an RV. I realized there was a pretty obvious vote. I voted Honest.

The reason I put the RV label on it is because I like RV's and wanted to make an RV, but didn't want to input nothing to that post either. Not because I have a horrid reason.

[necargoface]

God, I'm bad at remembering to reply to all the posts that I want to.

Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.

It sounds as though you think that he would flip Town. Do you?

He could flip town. I don't think he would, but he could. I will violently go after anyone who randomly hammers without stating an intent to hammer because random hammering doesn't give the defendant a chance to speak.

[YurikoJasmine]

I disagree with the content/ mindset towards RV in 68 but it looks pretty town motivated to me

[YurikoJasmine]

unvote:

unvote tag fixed so the automatic vote counter will recognize it -f

[YurikoJasmine]

Why not?

1) honest hasn't posted anything of content and I'd rather see something from him than have him dead now
2) I'm against policy lynch
3) it's too early d1 to lynch anyone yet imo

[YurikoJasmine]

Not to mention he's VERY null to me now

[ZeroSummer]

I mean of course he's null. He has one post which is just a naked vote. We shouldn't hammer until he posts more though.