↑ absta101 wrote:This post makes no sense coming from town and I asked him to post his case anyway to see if he really did make one. Like I said after he posted his case, it looked quite rushed (like he just made it after I asked him to post it).
This quote doesn't make sense considering Banakai just said that Boon played so scummy that he (Banakai) didn't even bother finishing/posting his case on him.
Post
#690 is interesting. I don't see why town-Banakai wouldn't just link back to the case he made on Boon earlier. I mean, he told HC that he had already given reasons for why he thought Boon was scum so this new version of the same case just looks like he is trying to make sure he looks town to HC. Not really a strong point, this could easily just be play style or personality but, as town, I definitely wouldn't have posted the same case twice just because someone got mad and told me to.
I feel like Absta has some good points here about Banakai - criticizes Banakai's case against Boon and his vote. Also questions that Banakai didn't know who to vote despite presenting a case on Boon.
In fact, the only thing I don't like about this post is where he tries to excuse Banakai's reposting of his case as possible play-style/personality.
↑ absta101 wrote:I'm fine with lynching either Boon or Banakai and we only have a few days left to decide. The people on the smaller wagons should migrate at this point.
This doesn't feel like it's coming from scum either - why would he try to narrow down the lynch pool to two people leaving a 50% chance his buddy gets lynched? Surely he just stays quiet about other wagons forming hoping one picks up and presents another alternative to Banakai.
↑ absta101 wrote:
I'm saying there is only 5 days left; if you start splitting up the wagons into 3 instead the two (major ones) there are now, we'll probably end up with a no-lynch or a rushed lynch. If you don't want to vote Boon or Banakai, that's fine, just don't try to pull people off the wagons at this stage.
Same again - he is really pushing to consolidate on Banakai/Boon. I could see this as possibly coming from scum if Boon looked the likelier wagon but I don't believe that was ever the case.
↑ absta101 wrote:Just vote Boon or banakai. We don't have much time.
Same again.
↑ absta101 wrote:This is fucked, i'll vote banakai if he gets one more vote. I just think Boon is the best lynch out of the two. Also, like Kmd said, Banakai hasn't claimed, if he is a PR or claims PR as scum, what can we do?
Chances are, Boon is scum; most of the town reads i've seen on him are due to him being "too scummy to be scum", we all know that's a terrible reason to call someone town so just lynch it already.
I don't get the frustration here - this post I could see coming from scum. He almost seems resigned to having to bus here and is preparing to move his vote. He is frustrated that he hasn't managed to make Boon the more popular wagon. I don't know whether he is coaching here either - hinting for Banakai to claim a PR. Yeah, I don't like this post.
↑ absta101 wrote:VOTE: Banakai
As promised. He is L-2 now I think.
He switches wagons. I think the timing of this vote is important as he votes after I have voted Banakai. I feel my vote was instrumental in leading to Banakai getting lynched as the game-state was becoming stale with 3 potential wagons and not many people looking to switch over. Once I voted Banakai, Absta may have thought it was inevitable that Banakai was getting lynched and wanted to be on the wagon.
Overall, I'm unsure on Absta. There are some posts I could see coming from scum and there are some that I see coming from town. I think I'm leaning more town on him - consolidating the wagons to Boon/Banakai makes no sense coming from Scum!Absta.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.