BBT 1247 wrote:Yeah sure, I could see that. For all we know scum could already be on it though... let's not state assumptions as if they're fact.
I'm not. Again, based on the assumption that we're all town, the scenario for Zoro as scum makes more sense than for Zoro as town. That's all.
BBT 1247 wrote:Boon is town though so he is good company and Bulba is legit unreadable so whatever; what was your point in saying that?
He's likely town, but let's not go crazy. Even if he is town, he could be wrong. My point is that I would take the conclusions, analysis and reasoned approaches of the collective group of myself, Kmd and KS over BBT, Bulba and Boon. That's all.
BBT 1247 wrote:If you have problems with my town read on the person you are trying to lynch why have you not addressed it?
I have engaged you on this before. I don't know why you're choosing to use the word "problems" as though this is some shock. We disagree on this player, that has been known for quite a while. If we have a disagreement over a read of another player, that, by very definition, is a "problem". That doesn't mean we're not both town or that we have to suspect one another, but that's a "problem" that will need to be resolved either through rhetoric or flips or reports or etc.
BBT 1247 wrote:I mean, did you even look at the case that you agreed with (and liked enough) to think someone was scum because of it. That's what I mean.
Uh, yes, of course.
I read TM's 1146 and liked it. I thought he presented a very good point about redFF's hypocrisy in his push of you. I said it was good enough to make me rethink my previous redFF town read. redFF has since responded to the case in such a way that I no longer think these things. Period.
I don't get where you are going with this line of questions. Do you think I make it a point to just randomly quote people and say, "oh, this post is good" without actually meaning it? I think you're letting your negatives about TM cloud your judgment of me.