Prozac's Basic Theme 4 - Murder in Marlowe - OVER!

[Aj The Epic]

AJ do you have any thoughts that don't involve me?

Or are you gonna throw a fit because I asked you to contribute?

Is that necessary?

I don't have good reads right now because I don't have a good grasp of mafia in general right now. I've been respecting Marquis' posts as town as well as Reckoner. I've played with Mollie and this is what I remember about her other than some lylo games. You're my only scum read right now because you just consistently refuse to answer the questions I ask regardless of how I phrase them.

[Starbuck]

VOTE: pirate mollie

I'm not a fan of being ignored. The fact that you're concentrating more on CDB now, who has been your only vote for pages and pages, and not responding/interacting outside of that isn't helpful.

I have not voted cdb all game.

Meaning that he has been the only vote on you. I realize my phrasing there could have been much better.

[ChannelDelibird]

Big arguments are more likely to stick in my mind than games in which we cooperate quietly, and remembering big arguments lends itself to thinking they must have been about scumreading each other. That seems pretty basic. As I mentioned earlier, I don't know why you would think that I'd deliberately misremember as scum, which is what it would have to be if my saying what I did was scummy

I can appreciate wanting to wait for me to interact with Nexus, though. I was kind of hoping that he would have said more by now that I could judge, because I like having my free read. Give it a little longer.

[Spiffeh]

@Papa Zito I don't mind the interactions taking place (I've barely read them) I guess it just seemed a little sudden that people multiple people were scum reading her when there was barely any of that the last time I read the thread.

Idk maybe it was premature.

@AJ last I heard you weren't satisfied responses. I have answered everything you asked. Now you're trying to say literally anything to cast me in a negative light regardless of whether it's true or not. Keep it up.

[ChannelDelibird]

Think I've definitely hit the said-all-I-could-say-without-repeating-myself point now. Got other shit to do now so I'll come back to this later if there's something that you really feel like I need to address.

[curiouskarmadog]

P

U

B

L

I

C

S

E

R

V

I

C

E

A

N

N

O

U

N

C

E

M

E

N

T

Meta is dumb don't do meta


ok carry on

LOL, so let me get this straight.

we disagree on uses for vigs and meta-ing?

christ, how do you feel about people coming out day 1 providing town tells for no reason?

let me guess.

3 pages behind at the moment, will update when I can (work just got shitty)...just skimmed and saw this...made me laugh.

[Spiffeh]

Btw I could also see Flameaxe being scum.

He seemed to get overly aggressive and defensive for Starbuck misunderstanding him? His ISO isn't anything to write home about and seems to be in the "Davsto is scummy for not posting" camp which seems like something easy for scum to hide behind.

[Aj The Epic]

@AJ last I heard you weren't satisfied responses. I have answered everything you asked. Now you're trying to say literally anything to cast me in a negative light regardless of whether it's true or not. Keep it up.

No you haven't. I'm going to lay it out here for you to answer.

I would like to hear AJ's response to the cases presented against SC because he seems to have disappeared ever since the wagon picked up steam.

First, why do you want me to respond to the cases against SC? I am NOT SC and all I get from this is you trying to time to him.

I pointed out a post that immediately disproved his initial reason for voting for me and since he kept his vote so I assumed that he agreed with Marquis' case. I mean he never further justified his vote so what am I supposed to think?

Why did you ASSUME SC's vote was based only on Marquis' case when SC explicitly said this:

Wow you vote for me instead of my answering my question to you I am insulted.

This is your defense to Marquis? Seriously? If you don't think it's a great case, explain how it's not a great case. I can't gauge what you think of him here.

VOTE: Spiffeh

Again and again I've gotten no answer to this question. You have not told me why you stated what you did when you were very clearly wrong. This, coupled with how you tried to tie me to SC (who you were actively attempting to string up) makes me think you're in the business of framing.

This is what I want answered. This isn't hard to notice either. And regardless of how you say it, you've never answered this latter question.

[Papa Zito]

LOL, so let me get this straight.

we disagree on uses for vigs and meta-ing?

yeah it's like we're two different people with different playstyles how the fuck did that happen

I thought we were twinsies his whole time my world is crushed

Is that necessary?

it kind of is cuz you aren't interacting with literally anyone else in the game?

Q: As it stands nobody else seems to be following your banner to lynch this guy, what is your plan to remedy this.

[Aj The Epic]

A.

Vote Spiffeh
????
Profit

Zito, I'm trying to get one question out of him and it feels like I'm pulling teeth. But I REALLY want that answer.

[Flameaxe]

There isn't anyone here that doesn't understand that point

No one understands why you can't multitask past that point.

[Papa Zito]

ok but you know there's more than 1 scum in this game right

Let's say he decides to overtly say "sorry cube I ain't gonna answer that" then what happens? Are you just gonna harp on the fact you can't get that one shining answer for the rest of the day?

[Aj The Epic]

Wouldn't your opinion of him change if he was unable to answer something and simply delayed it over multiple pages?

[scotmany12]

I pointed out a post that immediately disproved his initial reason for voting for me and since he kept his vote so I assumed that he agreed with Marquis' case. I mean he never further justified his vote so what am I supposed to think?

Why did you ASSUME SC's vote was based only on Marquis' case when SC explicitly said this:

This quote from spiffeh, which you quoted, is answering your question.

And then spiffeh also made this post:

@AJ I responded to that here:

I pointed out a post that immediately disproved his initial reason for voting for me and since he kept his vote so I assumed that he agreed with Marquis' case. I mean he never further justified his vote so what am I supposed to think?

I even laid out my thoughts throughout the whole situation chronologically in post 223 so you don't get to say I didn't answer your question.

Why do you keep focusing on this question you posed when spiffeh clearly answered it? If you aren't content with his explanation, then say so rather than constantly yelling at him to answer.

Why are you ignoring everything else that is going on?

[Flameaxe]

Wouldn't your opinion of him change if he was unable to answer something and simply delayed it over multiple pages?

Wouldn't our opinions change when you do essentially the same thing over the same amount of pages?

[Aj The Epic]

To me, 223 does not answer my question. His statement there is he answered it back and thus assumed SC changed his answer. Which doesn't make any sense because nothing SC says coincides with that. Especially when Spiffeh states it in his case against SC. That's why I have an issue with 223 being a defense of it.

I wasn't ignoring it. I was reading and waiting to form an opinion on it before Spiffeh made another statement on it that was completely egregious. I don't have anything productive to add so I stay quiet until I do.

Wouldn't our opinions change when you do essentially the same thing over the same amount of pages?

Difference being, I'm not ignoring questions.

[Flameaxe]

No you're just ignoring

1. Flameaxe
2. Blackberry
3. MattP replacing StrangerCoug
4. pirate mollie
5. ChannelDelibird
6. xRECKONERx
7. Davsto
9. Nexus
10. notscience
11. curiouskarmadog
12. catboi
13. Papa Zito
14. Starbuck
16. scotmany12
17. marquis
18. Bins

^This

[Aj The Epic]

As I stated, I'm reading the thread. However, I slip away when you start talking meta. I don't have any recent meta on anyone and so I choose to listen when the discussion heads that route.

[scotmany12]

223 clearly explains why spiffeh assumed what he did. Either you are fine with his explanation or not, but I don't see how you can expect him to expand on his reasoning for assuming, when it's all right there.

[Aj The Epic]

I don't understand how you make that assumption when there's nothing to support it.

[scotmany12]

I don't understand how you make that assumption when there's nothing to support it.

So you disagree with him. He still answered you. So there is really no point in you constantly harping on this when you could be also looking at everything else going on.

Also, I have a problem with you saying spiffeh is trying to tie you to SC. For him to frame you, SC would have to flip scum, yes?

[Aj The Epic]

Not necessarily. It could be him just developing scum reads that he can jump to. He also could be aware of SC's alignment and hardbussing.

[scotmany12]

Why do you refuse to comment on the SC wagon then, cause if he was framing you, then both spiffeh and SC would have to be scum together. You can't really accuse spiffeh of trying to frame you, unless of course you know SC's alignment, but there is only one way for you to know that.

[scotmany12]

And if you think he is framing you, then voting for SC would be just as productive as voting for spiffeh. But you adamantly only want to vote for spiffeh.

[Aj The Epic]

Why do you refuse to comment on the SC wagon then, cause if he was framing you, then both spiffeh and SC would have to be scum together. You can't really accuse spiffeh of trying to frame you, unless of course you know SC's alignment, but there is only one way for you to know that.

I've commented on the SC wagon.

Spiffeh asked me to respond to the cases on SC. There is no room for interpreting that.