Blitz 6: Normal! [Game Over]

[hi im Yakko]

Someone should hammer q.q

[Titus]

@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?

Discredit much?

You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.

[LoHa]

Yes. Good for you Titus.

[Soren]

@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?

Discredit much?

You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.

Might want to call in the fire brigade for that

[TheLhix]

Soren, Marry me.

[Nosferatu]

@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?

no, I just didn't see his reasoning behind his scum read. Not that I think it's wrong, I just didn't comprehend it.

@Titus

[LoHa]

VOTE: pisskop

Fun stops now, scum.

This guy hasn't done anything either.

Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.

This was pretty theatrical I agree.

[pisskop]

So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?

[hi im Yakko]

@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?

Discredit much?

You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.

Say whut. Talk to Nos man.

[itlepip]

So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?

Oh shoot, 1 + 1 = 3. I think that covers my role. Also someone hammer please.

[LoHa]

I'm not scum though.

I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.

Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.

[TheLhix]

I'm not scum though.

I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.

Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.

Here is a deal for you. Tell me in great detail why Titus is scum and I will retract my vote. Paragraph form, no logical fallacy.

[hi im Yakko]

Lmao oh man. He salty.

[Titus]

So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?

Oh shoot, 1 + 1 = 3. I think that covers my role. Also someone hammer please.

Seriously, pregnant whore is not a normal role. :-p

[TheLhix]

Lmao oh man. He salty.

Do you think I will get the essay? Should I grade it for accuracy?

[Aquanim]

wrt Titus: broken clock is right twice a day, I suppose.

I can hammer, anyone got anything else to say?

[Aquanim]

LMAO ok I missed #510.

[pignash]

So we're just hammering at this point yes? I see nothing useful from LoHa.

[hi im Yakko]

Omg these scum pansies.

[Soren]

hammer him

[Aquanim]

@LoHa

: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)

And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.

To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.

[Aquanim]

No. I'm not hammering yet. Not done talking.

[Aquanim]

For one thing, all of you seem to REALLY BADLY want this day over with. I'm not comfortable with that.

[TheLhix]

@LoHa

: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)

And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.

To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.

I do have a question on this. I dont think I am necessarily shit flinging around arguments, but besides the arguing or trying to make a case what would you suggest? On the Meta I came from it was very much based in empiricism and observation. While I have noticed the shift here in both tone and play style, I have noticed that challenging is equally detrimental. Would you say that is correct?

[pignash]

I'm not that worried about getting the day over with, but I don't think we have the votes for an alternate wagon and we're not really getting anything useful in the interim.