http://turtledove.wikia.com/wiki/Clotilde_Barford ??????
I dunno help me here Anen DX
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@dapper, how do you feel about sharing reads?
↑ Shiro wrote:
http://turtledove.wikia.com/wiki/Clotilde_Barford ??????
I dunno help me here Anen DX
↑ Dapper Stranger wrote:A man is explaining how this is just so. If a man is saying persons A, B, C, and D are scum and is wrong on B and D then it is providing common ground for persons A and C to share with the other two. Persons B and D, knowing they are falsely accused, are then susceptible to unwittingly playing for scum and a man's correct conclusions are thrown out as well.
↑ Dapper Stranger wrote:↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@dapper, how do you feel about sharing reads?
A man is always completely forthcoming in the past, but much and more is thinking this may not be wise. When every read is public, it is giving weaknesses scum are capitalizing on.
A man is explaining how this is just so. If a man is saying persons A, B, C, and D are scum and is wrong on B and D then it is providing common ground for persons A and C to share with the other two. Persons B and D, knowing they are falsely accused, are then susceptible to unwittingly playing for scum and a man's correct conclusions are thrown out as well.
No, one at a time unless a man is nearing death.
A man is intrigued with this one's Web of Suspicion, and would suggest keeping track of who is initiating each action will be much and more helpful. If a man is having a copper to spare, he is wagering the blue lines will be of more importance.
↑ Shiro wrote:↑ itlepip wrote:↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:My gizzard is screaming at me right now. Shut up, gizzard. Let me think for a moment. You might have a point, but let me contemplate it.
@itlepip, passionate storm, Elyse, and anyone else who's on right now, what are your thoughts on Shiro and Varsoon?
Shiro is less giffy than I hoped for, and I didn't know varsoon was in this game
"Mr spock send me some high.... Quality gifs for this Kind gentleman here... See how he likes our... Collection."
I had to
@Eagle you are in for a surprise if you find my fooling around scummy xD
↑ Aneninen wrote:
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@Klingon, if everyone (or most everyone) backed off right now, how soon could you read the thread and share reads?
I don't think she'll get lynched without posting a readlist. This post came very early, according to the vote amount on her. I remember doing something similar as scum in another game...
↑ Passionate Storm wrote:
You should be lynched for this comment. You don't back off from people in hopes they give content, you threaten them with the noose until they comply.
So, I wasn't the only one who had the same feeling.
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@garmr your whole post is stuff you've said before and makes it obvious you're not reading what I'm posting in response to you....
So you're on the ignore list until you can calm down and read. My brain and my theory both say it's likely you're scum, though, because this sounds like convenient tunneling to me, when the argument is repeated bs and the author isn't reading and until it gets brought up that he's dropped his aggression for some reason it gets brought up against. It does provide a good way for you to ignore other players, though, like ythan did in my last game, and ignore list doesn't mean I'm ignoring your scumminess, just your stupidity.
That said, my theory says it's slightly unlikely that you flip scum with Elyse (I noticed my mistake when I woke up for some reason), so if you know she's your scum buddy you can keep acting like an idiot for a while because she's next and then whoever theory says is more likely, I think. Unless I've discarded theory by then.
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
That said, my theory says it's slightly unlikely that you flip scum with Elyse (I noticed my mistake when I woke up for some reason), so if you know she's your scum buddy you can keep acting like an idiot for a while because she's next and then whoever theory says is more likely, I think. Unless I've discarded theory by then.
↑ Dapper Stranger wrote:I think Eagle's push/non-vote is out of site-newbieness (reminds me of myself). Don't really want to hang him for that.
-Fresh
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Garmt, every one of your points I've responded to or is really freaking dumb.
1. The reads early game were to push people around and get them out of their comfort zone so I could read them better when I had sleep and time to distance myself from the thread. That includes reads, my reads are freaking crap if I haven't had time to take a step back. I believe thhat on multiple occasions I had made it clear that I til I posted my next days reads list none of those could be taken seriously.
2.see one. Not saying this again.
3.NOT AT ALL, bucko. Glancing at and skimming are NOT under any circumstance reading thoroughly and understanding as you have proven time and time again.
4.see 1 and my most recent pistsm READ them this time don't glance or skim
5. I literally said its likely you aren't a team. So HoW on earth is this linking you?
6.
Read.
The.
Game.
Please.
I don't think you can make this up. I have pushed Elyse harder than anyone else this game.
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
That said, my theory says it's slightly unlikely that you flip scum with Elyse (I noticed my mistake when I woke up for some reason), so if you know she's your scum buddy you can keep acting like an idiot for a while because she's next and then whoever theory says is more likely,I think. Unless I've discarded theory by then.
so if you know she's your scum buddy you can keep acting like an idiot for a while because she's next
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@garmr
Quick question, did you just happen to miss all the stuff in 514 because you "glanced over it" or "skimmed it?" Because that would make sense
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Or are you just not reading the game thread and tunneling me because it's a good way to get out of reading your fellow players?