Mini 1770: College Mafia! (Game Ovah)

[Firebringer]

That would be you.

Well then I guess I am not cool with it?
Wondering why you want to policy lynch a cute dragon like me.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I just find people like you hard to read and so a policy lynch is always the best option.

[Firebringer]

Thats cool I guess.
Thats one way to sort me.

Since I am never getting night killed anyways.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

It's the only way to sort you.

[Firebringer]

Agree to disagree?
I am pretty sure my motivation can be seen.

But alot of what I post is in the moment so its fueled by my mood at the time. So I can see how thats not easy to sort.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

It's not easy to sort because you don't explain things and that's anti-town.

[Firebringer]

When I start explaining shit is when you know I am scum lol.
I know how to fake being town as scum.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I see.

Is that something you exclusively do as scum because that seems kind of dumb.

[Firebringer]

Its how people like you read players.
Like literally I can bullshit excuses to you and make up shit as I go on why I read players the way I do, but Id rather just tell you what I am thinking truthfully because thats me being honest and transparent.

If you want me to lie and come up with reasons to satisfy you on my reads, thats is me acting like scum.
Yeah, no.

Not doing that.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I mean, nobody is asking you to lie. That's a strange way of spinning what I just said to you.

[Firebringer]

I mean, nobody is asking you to lie. That's a strange way of spinning what I just said to you.

When people ask me to explain reads.

Thats them telling me to explain something I don't understand.
In other words I have to make something up.

Which I would totally do if I was scum.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

OK, but you just said that it's funny that people expect you to explain things.

That implies to me that you don't like explaining your thoughts/reads etc and that means it's going to be hard to read you and you're just going to state things like they're fact and expect people not to question it because you 'don't explain things.'

I think a PL deals with this problem quite well.

[Firebringer]

If I had a solid explanation, I would have explained it.
Everything is gut unless I have anything else to add.

[Night Hunters]

@BBT, Can you respond to the sentiment of 134 please? You know me well enough to know that I like when you stand up to me if I'm being stupid. I could use some help to determine if I am just stubbornly scumreading everyone who defends scum or whether GL is actually scummy there.

Oh and I'm totally down for a Fire lynch D2 if he doesn't start giving reasons for his Cakez read. His "reasons" for scumreading me are inconsistent with what has actually happened in the thread.

~MamaBear

[Firebringer]

lol that isn't true, but I like how Night Hunters is down for a lynch on me.
Playing to the scum meta much Titus?

[PeregrineV]

Prod received. (Typically not on ont he weekends- sorry guys).

Anyways,

Vote: ɀefiend

What kind of character is that?

[PeregrineV]

I'm read and catch up today/tomorrow.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Hey Titus, I haven't read up properly yet, just thought I would take the chance to interact with Fire.

I'll get around to you about 134 when I do though.

[SirCakez]

BBT what's your read on NH? And do you actually think Fire is scum or would it just be a PL for bad play?

[Night Hunters]

Fire, why are you pulling completely incorrect meta of me out of your ass?

-Dad

[Firebringer]

Fire, why are you pulling completely incorrect meta of me out of your ass?

-Dad

You are normally very opinionated this early in games?

[ɀefiend]

What defines the end of RVS to you? You said you had town reads but didn't mention scum reads, which means you still have to place your vote somewhere, or do something else to continue getting reads. If RVS ends when you just get a couple of reads and everybody stops doing things, the game is just going to stagnate.

I consider the end of RVS to be when someone has starts making a serious push, I;e in this case NH attacking Zefiend for rolefishing.
I already stated that I was waiting to see where NH went with that specific push when the massive wagon formed so I questioned it.

I'm trying very hard to understand the dynamics of this post. I see two things that could possibly be worrisome but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and allow you to try to explain.

1. If you consider the end of RVS to be when someone starts making a serious push, could you explain this statement?

(Why do people always end up calling me Cakey on every forum I go to?)

I've gotten a couple townreads already so yeah we're out of RVS successfully.

(my italics for emphasis.)
Do you mean:

A, therefore B.
A cannot happen if B is happening. A happened, therefore B is no longer happening.
or something else?

2. NH's push on me appears to be tabled or scrapped at this moment. Besides asking one question to one Head of NH, you haven't mentioned their Zefiend-push since then. Yet, you used the reasoning that you were interested in seeing where it was going to slow down the massive wagon? Furthermore, what is wrong with a simultaneous Zefiend-push by NH and massive-wagon by others? FYPOV, why should wagoning on one player (massive) be contingent on the resolution of a different push (NH on me)?

[ɀefiend]

Prod received. (Typically not on ont he weekends- sorry guys).

Anyways,

Vote: ɀefiend

What kind of character is that?

Swish z.

[SirCakez]

What defines the end of RVS to you? You said you had town reads but didn't mention scum reads, which means you still have to place your vote somewhere, or do something else to continue getting reads. If RVS ends when you just get a couple of reads and everybody stops doing things, the game is just going to stagnate.

I consider the end of RVS to be when someone has starts making a serious push, I;e in this case NH attacking Zefiend for rolefishing.
I already stated that I was waiting to see where NH went with that specific push when the massive wagon formed so I questioned it.

I'm trying very hard to understand the dynamics of this post. I see two things that could possibly be worrisome but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and allow you to try to explain.

1. If you consider the end of RVS to be when someone starts making a serious push, could you explain this statement?

(Why do people always end up calling me Cakey on every forum I go to?)

I've gotten a couple townreads already so yeah we're out of RVS successfully.

(my italics for emphasis.)
Do you mean:

A, therefore B.
A cannot happen if B is happening. A happened, therefore B is no longer happening.
or something else?

2. NH's push on me appears to be tabled or scrapped at this moment. Besides asking one question to one Head of NH, you haven't mentioned their Zefiend-push since then. Yet, you used the reasoning that you were interested in seeing where it was going to slow down the massive wagon? Furthermore, what is wrong with a simultaneous Zefiend-push by NH and massive-wagon by others? FYPOV, why should wagoning on one player (massive) be contingent on the resolution of a different push (NH on me)?

1. What is A and what is B?

2. The Zefiend push was unrelated to the massive wagon. I said I wanted to see what NH was doing with the push and how you would react before evaluating it, since it looked like there was evidence to back it up. Massive wagon had nothing to support it so I questioned it. The massive wagon and zefiend push had no correlation here.

[ɀefiend]

@BBT: I am not opposed to policy-lynching Firebringer, either. But there is plenty of time to decide that. For now, I'm interested in the SC-Firebringer connection and the possible WKing theory floating about. I need to see how certain things develop.