New York 195: Adventure Mafia - Game over!

Ircher · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:27 am

Thats 2 scum found: Zakk/Shotty.

Who's next?

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:29 am

VOTE: I am Innocent

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=22959

This has been a long time coming …

In post 23, zakk wrote:p-edit: welp i wonder if thats real

Of course it isn’t real. Have you ever played with Shotty before?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:30 am

In post 24, Ircher wrote:
In post 20, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 19, copper223 wrote:@Ircher
Nice, I can already tell you are more sure of yourself compared to when we played the first time.

@dr
Increased likelyhood of getting a read compared to another random, but since Ircher's been playing a lot that's not necessarily true anymore.
And the cooper ircher buddying continues!
VOTE: ircher
I'm almost sure of this now.
What happen to general chat?

But, if you find that scummy then:

VOTE: Shotty
For being opportunistic in play and deciding that general chit-chat is scum-indicative when it clearly isnt.

This is the worst OMGUS I've ever seen. Also you're already dead.

@Zakk

Well I can't give you four, but at this rate I will be able to be page 3

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:31 am

In post 25, Ircher wrote:Thats 2 scum found: Zakk/Shotty.

Who's next?

Why zakk? Also how is it opportune for me to have claimed to have caught one scum, but not for you to have found and push two?

copper223 · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:31 am

In post 22, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Laugh all you want, if he flips scum you're next.

Kill: Ircher

If you caught Ircher scum on page 1 I'll be happy to go next.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:31 am

In post 29, copper223 wrote:
In post 22, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Laugh all you want, if he flips scum you're next.

Kill: Ircher
If you caught Ircher scum on page 1 I'll be happy to go next.

I'll remember this.

zakk · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:32 am

In post 24, Ircher wrote:
In post 20, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 19, copper223 wrote:@Ircher
Nice, I can already tell you are more sure of yourself compared to when we played the first time.

@dr
Increased likelyhood of getting a read compared to another random, but since Ircher's been playing a lot that's not necessarily true anymore.
And the cooper ircher buddying continues!
VOTE: ircher
I'm almost sure of this now.
What happen to general chat?

But, if you find that scummy then:

VOTE: Shotty
For being opportunistic in play and deciding that general chit-chat is scum-indicative when it clearly isnt.

you can't vote you're dead.

Ircher · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:33 am

Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.

Ircher · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:33 am

In post 31, zakk wrote:
In post 24, Ircher wrote:
In post 20, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 19, copper223 wrote:@Ircher
Nice, I can already tell you are more sure of yourself compared to when we played the first time.

@dr
Increased likelyhood of getting a read compared to another random, but since Ircher's been playing a lot that's not necessarily true anymore.
And the cooper ircher buddying continues!
VOTE: ircher
I'm almost sure of this now.
What happen to general chat?

But, if you find that scummy then:

VOTE: Shotty
For being opportunistic in play and deciding that general chit-chat is scum-indicative when it clearly isnt.
you can't vote you're dead.

I'm not dead.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:34 am

In post 32, Ircher wrote:Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.

Nah, this would be way to obvious. It's also not general cat chat, that tends to happen in here

Ircher · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:36 am

In post 34, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Ircher wrote:Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.
Nah, this would be way to obvious. It's also not general cat chat, that tends to happen in here

Doesn't change the fact your being opportunistic.

Zakk MIGHT be town, but chances of Shotty town right now is 0.5% for me.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:38 am

In post 35, Ircher wrote:
In post 34, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Ircher wrote:Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.
Nah, this would be way to obvious. It's also not general cat chat, that tends to happen in here
Doesn't change the fact your being opportunistic.

Zakk MIGHT be town, but chances of Shotty town right now is 0.5% for me.

It's very concerning that you find scum hunting to be a scumtell, oh wait you are just scared scum, that's right.

copper223 · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:38 am

In post 26, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Have you ever played with Shotty before?

Nope, never. How likely do you think he is consciously faking his own meta?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:39 am

In post 37, copper223 wrote:
In post 26, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Have you ever played with Shotty before?
Nope, never. How likely do you think he is consciously faking his own meta?

I'm telling you ircher is dead.

Ircher · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:39 am

In post 36, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 35, Ircher wrote:
In post 34, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Ircher wrote:Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.
Nah, this would be way to obvious. It's also not general cat chat, that tends to happen in here
Doesn't change the fact your being opportunistic.

Zakk MIGHT be town, but chances of Shotty town right now is 0.5% for me.
It's very concerning that you find scum hunting to be a scumtell, oh wait you are just scared scum, that's right.

Scumreading people for banter is NOT scumhunting.

Mini 1763 - Yes, some of them were scum. But some of them were town. That was the (awful) game where everyone basically stopped caring. the

Ircher · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:40 am

In post 38, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 37, copper223 wrote:
In post 26, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Have you ever played with Shotty before?
Nope, never. How likely do you think he is consciously faking his own meta?
I'm telling you ircher is dead.

SirCakez is online I believe. If I truly got dayvigged, I'd be announced dead by now.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:42 am

In post 39, Ircher wrote:
In post 36, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 35, Ircher wrote:
In post 34, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Ircher wrote:Cuz your reasoning is way off. Apparently, general chit-chat is a scumtell.

On the other hand, Zakk is sheeping your poor logic without contributing any of his own. It looks like the two of you are teammates.
Nah, this would be way to obvious. It's also not general cat chat, that tends to happen in here
Doesn't change the fact your being opportunistic.

Zakk MIGHT be town, but chances of Shotty town right now is 0.5% for me.
It's very concerning that you find scum hunting to be a scumtell, oh wait you are just scared scum, that's right.
Scumreading people for banter is NOT scumhunting.

Mini 1763 - Yes, some of them were scum. But some of them were town. That was the (awful) game where everyone basically stopped caring. the

Am I supposed to see mini 1763 and know that game? What are you talking about?

Ircher · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:43 am

Go read it. Point being is that general banter is not alignment indicative just as activity isn't.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:47 am

In post 42, Ircher wrote:Go read it. Point being is that general banter is not alignment indicative just as activity isn't.

Oh activity is, trust me. Also why are you so jolted if it doesn't matter? Town shouldn't get this excited, well I guess I did just kill you.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:47 am

@zakk

– Hey answer my question …

In post 37, copper223 wrote:Nope, never. How likely do you think he is consciously faking his own meta?

You aren’t zakk … but anyway ..

My current opinion is – not very. If you know what to look for I think he’s able to be read fairly successfully via meta. He's never got me to divulge what those keys are so I'm not too worried about him tainting his own play.

And lol-fake-daykills are not one of the keys and is pretty alignment irrelevant to Shotty.

Ircher · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:49 am

HURT WITH A BLADE: Shotty

zakk · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:50 am

In post 33, Ircher wrote:
In post 31, zakk wrote:
In post 24, Ircher wrote:
In post 20, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 19, copper223 wrote:@Ircher
Nice, I can already tell you are more sure of yourself compared to when we played the first time.

@dr
Increased likelyhood of getting a read compared to another random, but since Ircher's been playing a lot that's not necessarily true anymore.
And the cooper ircher buddying continues!
VOTE: ircher
I'm almost sure of this now.
What happen to general chat?

But, if you find that scummy then:

VOTE: Shotty
For being opportunistic in play and deciding that general chit-chat is scum-indicative when it clearly isnt.
you can't vote you're dead.
I'm not dead.

Spoiler: nonsense you'll be stone dead in a moment

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:50 am

In post 44, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
@zakk
– Hey answer my question …

In post 37, copper223 wrote:Nope, never. How likely do you think he is consciously faking his own meta?
You aren’t zakk … but anyway ..

My current opinion is – not very. If you know what to look for I think he’s able to be read fairly successfully via meta. He's never got me to divulge what those keys are so I'm not too worried about him tainting his own play.

And lol-fake-daykills are not one of the keys and is pretty alignment irrelevant to Shotty.

I'm harder to read than... well something hard to read.

Ircher · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:51 am

Jane Eyre.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Thu May 19, 2016 9:52 am

In post 45, Ircher wrote:HURT WITH A BLADE: Shotty

Well, I'm glad I did it first.