If you were really trying to dispute this you’d have brought up the much better point that the first link isn’t even to a game but to GTKAS for Zakk himself. That’s what someone who actually was criticially assessing zakk’s post would do. Because it is garbage to say “This is Town Pers” and to link to non-game thread.In post 1718, Persivul wrote:@zakk: OMG, you're going to one of my newbie games from a year ago and saying that's my definitive town meta.
Are you scum, or just a fucking idiot?
But you just try to laugh it off as if meta from a year ago somehow isn’t valid. People are bringing up meta for me from 5 to 6 years ago on a regular basis.
Then why don’t you share what your reaction test provided you with vis-a-vie reads.In post 1721, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Btw my egg vote was purely to test reactions and opportunism
VOTE: Zack
If this doesn’t get Vigged there is no justice in this world. I’ll even take a Serial Killer trying to frame his shots to pretend to be a Vig.In post 1732, Killthestory wrote:bodies on top of bodies
oh man all hell broke loose, you killed my cousin back in 94', fuc yo truce
Or this …In post 1793, Nosferatu wrote:still here, kinda prodge, but I'll read up
Hello Pers’s scum-buddy.In post 1734, TehBrawlGuy wrote:The idea that the neighborhood is 1 scum is terrible imo. You're absolutely outguessing the mod on this, and it reads like a very easy way to set up chain-mislynches. I read the whole neighborhood as Town, tbh.
Pers's ISO has me going both ways a little bit, but I settled on a town lean. I feel for him when he said "lynch me". I feel pretty damn similar. This game has been misrepping and confbias out the ass, while you're letting low-content/scummy content players like Seth and Heur off for free, while they get a front seat to watch the thread just devolve into crap.
A combination of scum and stupid Town. Why the fake outrage of an obvious answer?In post 1763, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Who the fuck lynches conftown?
Glad you answered this. Soon enough I’ll know whether this is scum Matt talking for sure or not.In post 1745, projectmatt wrote:It's bad logic. I actually think his logic is very silly, and I generally find unwavering confidence in reads to be a bad thing. That said though, I'm not looking up to TehBrawlGuy as the pinnacle of good logic/agreement. I also don't think bad logic is inherently scum.