This is a description of the players voting Ranger, not you.Kuroi wrote:I'm thinking at this point, most people currently on me are just looking for any possible reason to get me lynched.
There does seem to be an overlap, though!
Imagine that.
This is a description of the players voting Ranger, not you.Kuroi wrote:I'm thinking at this point, most people currently on me are just looking for any possible reason to get me lynched.
Grow up
Hey in this world you're yelling about where you're town and all three scum are pushing you...it's an objective fact multiple town are reading you as scum too. What say you?In post 975, Ranger wrote:This is a description of the players voting Ranger, not you.Kuroi wrote:I'm thinking at this point, most people currently on me are just looking for any possible reason to get me lynched.
There does seem to be an overlap, though!
Imagine that.
Multiple?PantherPunt wrote:Hey in this world you're yelling about where you're town and all three scum are pushing you...it's an objective fact multiple town are reading you as scum too. What say you?
I count 6 totalIn post 978, Ranger wrote:Multiple?PantherPunt wrote:Hey in this world you're yelling about where you're town and all three scum are pushing you...it's an objective fact multiple town are reading you as scum too. What say you?
Do tell.
I count one.
I don't see the need. Everyone else can already see you use self-meta and I'm not about to spend 30 minutes explaining to you how you're using self-metaIn post 972, Ranger wrote:Oh, I am dead serious.
Point it out.
Every one.
Use a spoiler tag if you're concerned about length.
I was reiterating your reason for unvoting rangerIn post 980, KuroiXHF wrote:That's the most accurate description of me you've made all game. Congratulations.
It's just a shame you don't understand it.
OK KuroiIn post 973, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm thinking at this point, most people currently on me are just looking for any possible reason to get me lynched.In post 970, Dunnstral wrote:NoIn post 969, KuroiXHF wrote:Dunnstral, do you think I've still hard slipped?
I did ask if it was possible I had misunderstood after all, which is what seems to have happened. Trying to twist it into me pushing on you is a stretch.
As in...
If I say something that could possibly be construed as if I said something scummy or contradicted myself or double backed, they'll take it that way.
However...
If I say something that is townie, it's not factored in.
I actually want to say I've done more scum hunting than many others, despite the fact that I've only relatively recently joined in. I'm actually certain some are hiding in the shadows. When I have more time tomorrow, I'll dig deeper.
In post 828, ploben wrote:In post 824, Dunnstral wrote:Also who are your scum reads? Besides Chip mostly. What are your thoughts on Ranger and Kuroi
In post 838, ploben wrote:Good point.In post 837, Dunnstral wrote:How many times does she get to do thatIn post 835, ploben wrote:Let's see what Ranger has to say about all this content since her last post.I'm just less willing to jump on her at this point then some other players are right now without hearing her catch up.
Also, she promised a case against me so I am reserving some judgement until then also. Let's see how "original" her case is against me.
Unless of course she says she won't present her case until D1 deadline, then I'll reconsider in a more timely manner.
So, in his #828, ploben says he is fine with lynching Ranger, quoting his own #785. Then, just ten posts later, he forgets that he's done that and tries for the "voice of reason" approach, which he repeats in #850.In post 850, ploben wrote:Oh Chip.In post 847, Chip Butty wrote:Would it have hurt so very much to let the guy answer for himself? This looks like scum jumping in to save a scumbuddy before he says something stupid.In post 843, PantherPunt wrote: Chip- you can read someone town even if they incorrectly read you as scum. you just have to determine if you think they believe, truly believe, what they are selling. Having original points and perspectives that show critical thinking rather than parroting what others have already said is a component of that. 841 is a silly post
I just want to see what Ranger says before I consider IF I will support her wagon.I can get behind Kuroi's now based on his posts, I can't fully get behind Ranger's yet.
You know, in every game I have played in since my very first, I am or have been the leading poster, usually by a wide margin. It's part of my meta, and I have done it as both Town and scum. But here, there is not just one player surpassing me in VC, but THREE. And, surprise, surprise, it's the three scummiest. The leaderboard: Dunstral (181); Panther (171); ploben (151); Chip Butty (131); karnos (84).In post 884, Ranger wrote:Hmm...I wonder.BTD6 wrote:People are posting so much in this game I almost suspect scum spamming.Nope, there couldn'tRanger 45
KuroiXHF 36
Dunnstral 162
PantherPunt (A REPLACEMENT!) 137
duppin 33
ploben 150
BTD6_maker 20
Chip Butty 130
Florestan 35
karnos 82
Shadow_step 15
Persivul 25
Scott Brosius 4
AlpacaAlpacapossiblybeanytrend here, whatsoever. Clearly this means nothing. I mean, surely there's ABSOLUTELY no trend there, right? It's not like the active posters could be scum or anything.
Lot easier when there are three of you doing it. Obvious plan to try to dominate proceeedings. Suggests strongly that Mafia recruited their traitor, since these three are all on the same page re:strategy.In post 891, PantherPunt wrote:It's real. There's an old saying where I play "sort by post count become werewolf expert"
Bc scum have a hard time making a lot of posts without fucking up. Without making a couple of howlers.
Being on the same page also suggests daytalk.In post 985, Chip Butty wrote:Suggests strongly that Mafia recruited their traitor, since these three are all on the same page re:strategy.
No, you did that because you want him to focus on Ranger.In post 986, PantherPunt wrote: That's probably why I kept telling ploben to leave you alone, huh chip?
Oh, so now you think I am Town again?In post 988, ploben wrote:I think Panther and Chip are suffering from some confirmation bias, against separate targets of course.
Scum typically don't have a problem with confbias LOL, so if you think I am confbiased, you think I am Town. So why did you say you are okay with voting me?In post 991, ploben wrote:I'm not sure. I trusted Panther with his reads and he actually gave pretty good advice on basing reads off of associative reads.
No, again, this just isn't a tell. Stop just blatantly sheeping Ranger andIn post 985, Chip Butty wrote:You know, in every game I have played in since my very first, I am or have been the leading poster, usually by a wide margin. It's part of my meta, and I have done it as both Town and scum. But here, there is not just one player surpassing me in VC, but THREE. And, surprise, surprise, it's the three scummiest. The leaderboard: Dunstral (181); Panther (171); ploben (151); Chip Butty (131); karnos (84).In post 884, Ranger wrote:Hmm...I wonder.BTD6 wrote:People are posting so much in this game I almost suspect scum spamming.Nope, there couldn'tRanger 45
KuroiXHF 36
Dunnstral 162
PantherPunt (A REPLACEMENT!) 137
duppin 33
ploben 150
BTD6_maker 20
Chip Butty 130
Florestan 35
karnos 82
Shadow_step 15
Persivul 25
Scott Brosius 4
AlpacaAlpacapossiblybeanytrend here, whatsoever. Clearly this means nothing. I mean, surely there's ABSOLUTELY no trend there, right? It's not like the active posters could be scum or anything.
Lot easier when there are three of you doing it. Obvious plan to try to dominate proceeedings. Suggests strongly that Mafia recruited their traitor, since these three are all on the same page re:strategy.In post 891, PantherPunt wrote:It's real. There's an old saying where I play "sort by post count become werewolf expert"
Bc scum have a hard time making a lot of posts without fucking up. Without making a couple of howlers.
First, stop assuming you have 100% solved the game, second townslops are either really towny or really scummy, so it is a reasonable thing to vote someone for.In post 987, Chip Butty wrote:Being on the same page also suggests daytalk.In post 985, Chip Butty wrote:Suggests strongly that Mafia recruited their traitor, since these three are all on the same page re:strategy.
I'm afraid I'm going to have to Townslip again: If Mafia recruit their traitor, do the three of them have an inital opportunity to converse prior to the start of D1? Because, if so, they wouldn't need daytalk to all be on the same page.
@ploben: How do you like that Townslip, huh? Wanna try to make that the basis of a vote on me, like you did the others?
This post is pathetic. Kuroi trying to make it look so much worse than it actually is.In post 701, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm sorry, but are we speaking the same language? This is English, right? I shouldn't have to ask this, but no one is understanding my clear message.In post 695, ploben wrote:What? Ranger was calling you town. What does "If she nailed all scum, then everyone else is scum by elimination, and she only mentioned me." mean?In post 694, KuroiXHF wrote:Spoiler:
Also, I stand by with what I said about Ranger. I find it strange that someone is so certain fo who scum are early on in this game. If she nailed all scum, then everyone else is scum by elimination, and she only mentioned me.
I understand that Ranger is calling me town.
I said that I was uncomfortable. I'm uncomfortable because she was confident in this.
Now if she nailed all scum, that would mean that she got a hold of every other person not scum and called them town.
But she did it to me, and me only.
Do you understand now?
Do you?