Newbie 1714 (Game Over)

mhsmith0 · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:27 pm

Is that mainly due to what you were arguing at 331, or something else? Hunches are fine, but it's better to try and zero in on what's bugging you if you can.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:59 pm

In post 373, mhsmith0 wrote:1) @sick: do you agree with what zyf said in 358 about what you were saying about vandit-fox?

2) Wrt FOX's rb speculation, I'm not sure I really have an opinion about whether it points to anything spec wise. It's possible ranger was the mafias desired kill, whether due to ineffectual pr hunting, generic fear kill of the IC (I've played with ranger only once, and she was Mafia, but I was quite impressed and I think she has a rep as a very good town player), her specific reads, or something else entirely.

3) anyone have anything else they want to talk about pre claim?

Nah he hit it on the head.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:45 am

V/LA till sunday.
Want to see fox catchup by then so don't quickhammer.
Vandit PR softing is unsurprising. He's likely getting lynched anyways so idk if people want to CC him here if he hardclaims.

Zyf · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:55 am

In post 377, Raskolnikov wrote:V/LA till sunday.
Want to see fox catchup by then so don't quickhammer.
Vandit PR softing is unsurprising. He's likely getting lynched anyways so idk if people want to CC him here if he hardclaims.

I think we should discuss it before we decide to get a CC. We may be able to figure out he's lying without having to CC.
If we lynch and he flips mafia after a cc we're likely down a valuable PR. If he claims doctor it's easier to CC then if he claims cop/tracker, due to WIFOM strats.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:21 am

I think that we should all agree not to have any quick CC's against anything Vandit claims. Beyond that I'd rather not discuss the specifics of what should be countered and why until after he actually claims.

Zyf · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:02 am

In post 379, mhsmith0 wrote:I think that we should all agree not to have any quick CC's against anything Vandit claims. Beyond that I'd rather not discuss the specifics of what should be countered and why until after he actually claims.

I suppose you're right.
Well, see you guys after vandit claims.

beeboy · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:03 am

Depends what Vandit claims.
If he claims BP we are lynching him.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:09 am

1) Let's not discuss CC'ing until after claim
2) Let's not discuss what kind of claim might be more or less believable until after claim

Zyf · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:33 am

1) Vandit, we're waiting on you
2) How long are we planning on waiting for this claim? Monday?

mhsmith0 · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:40 am

mhsmith0 · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:41 am

FWIW, games on this site are usually a good deal livelier than this one has been the last few days.

Zyf · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:53 pm

In post 385, mhsmith0 wrote:FWIW, games on this site are usually a good deal livelier than this one has been the last few days.

I think that's due to the fact that we're waiting to hear Vandit's claim and there's nothing else to talk about.
And we could easily lynch vandit anyway
this is slowwwww

mhsmith0 · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:55 pm

yeah basically my point. this game state is unusual, so please don't think it's usually like this.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:15 pm

Honestly can we just hammer him?

There is no way he is PR lets face it.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:28 pm

Might as well give him the chance though. 24 hour notice of intent to vote, EVEN IF IT IS A HAMMER. Defend and/or claim in that time period. If anyone here thinks I should give more than 24 hours, I'm willing to discuss an extension, but only with good reason.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:33 pm

@Mod

Can we get a vote tally plz?

Zyf · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:28 am

In post 388, Sickofit1138 wrote:Honestly can we just hammer him?

There is no way he is PR lets face it.

That sounds a little scummy, sick.
Anyway:

@Mod: Requesting prod onto Vandit

F-oh-ex · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:05 am

Zzzzzzzzzzz.

Zyf · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:43 am

In post 392, F-oh-ex wrote:Zzzzzzzzzzz.

žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž
VOTE: vandit

Zaicon · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 2:43 am

Vote Count 2.4

Vandit24 (2):

beeboy, Zyf

No Vote (5):

F-oh-ex, mhsmith0, Raskolnikov, Sickofit1138, Vandit24

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch!

Deadline is Monday, June 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM CST, which is in (expired on 2016-06-20 16:00:00).

Prodding Vandit24.
Edit: Or not. He disabled PMs

Zyf · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:36 am

e.e
Hey guys
When are we planning on lynching
Because this is getting kinda dumb
We can't even prod. Wth

mhsmith0 · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:38 am

Unless vandit shows back up I'll be voting this evening. I plan to stick to my 24 hour notice.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:44 am

VOTE: vanditVOTE:

F-oh-ex · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:23 am

@mod In that case, ETA on Vandit getting replaced?

Zyf · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Sat Jun 11, 2016 10:09 am

In post 397, Sickofit1138 wrote:VOTE: vanditVOTE:

Is that a joke vote?
Or a typo?