I apologize for using gender neutral pronouns?In post 223, eagerSnake wrote:"their"In post 220, Dwlee99 wrote:Being able to read how genuine someone's posting is makes tojam feel like such obvious scum. All of their posts seem forced.
???
I apologize for using gender neutral pronouns?In post 223, eagerSnake wrote:"their"In post 220, Dwlee99 wrote:Being able to read how genuine someone's posting is makes tojam feel like such obvious scum. All of their posts seem forced.
That is just not smart at all. Why are you lining up lynches? Why that order? Why are you so confident in your reads on like day 4?In post 222, Creature wrote:idk, maybe we can just lynch tojam2, LQ and DotW in that order.
I doubt anyone else is scum.
Yeah, you need to keep your mislynch options open apparently.In post 226, LicketyQuickety wrote:That is just not smart at all.
Because I am confident on them.Why are you lining up lynches?
It doesn't have to be in that order, maybe if you stop trying to discredit my reads I might change the order.Why that order?
Why are you ignoring my reasoning posts?Why are you so confident in your reads on like day 4?
lolIn post 231, Dragon of the West wrote:Because creature has beenquietly pushingto make me seem like scumbut I haven't seen anyone else suggest that or agree with it
And now you are backing away from the read. *pukes*In post 227, Creature wrote:Nvm, I can't determine what tojam2 is trying to do.
Good Morning!In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.In post 215, Creature wrote:Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"
Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.
@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?
You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.
Why did you assume scum communicate via PM?In post 236, crazycrabman wrote:Good Morning!In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.In post 215, Creature wrote:Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"
Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.
@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?
Nope, I haven't even played forum mafia before this. I have played mafia in real life but the scum never communicate there.
I am saying you're a VI.In post 237, LicketyQuickety wrote:You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.
I am not a VI, don't call me that again.In post 239, Creature wrote:I am saying you're a VI.In post 237, LicketyQuickety wrote:You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.
He said I wasIn post 235, Dwlee99 wrote:What about it is faked?
Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.In post 238, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why did you assume scum communicate via PM?In post 236, crazycrabman wrote:Good Morning!In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.In post 215, Creature wrote:Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"
Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.
@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?
Nope, I haven't even played forum mafia before this. I have played mafia in real life but the scum never communicate there.
Ok I legit think you slipped now. But why do you "assume otherwise" now?In post 243, crazycrabman wrote:Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.
Village Idiot.In post 245, crazycrabman wrote:What is a VI?
I misread your post as "why do you" instead of "why did you" and was clarifying that I believe otherwise now.In post 246, LicketyQuickety wrote:Ok I legit think you slipped now. But why do you "assume otherwise" now?In post 243, crazycrabman wrote:Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.
I'm not using that as the case against you, I was just trying to figure out why you were putting me on your scum reads. What I said there is true, I haven't seen anyone else scum read me. Let me go back through the thread to make sure I'm not wrong about thatIn post 232, Creature wrote:lolIn post 231, Dragon of the West wrote:Because creature has beenquietly pushingto make me seem like scumbut I haven't seen anyone else suggest that or agree with it