Literally Anything uPick (Game Over)

Katsuki · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:08 am

In post 348, Ircher wrote:Yes, meh 0 Null.

Postie is my biggest scumread. Katsuki mainly cuz his refusal to answer Q / dodging all around / etc.

MY refusal to answer Q??? YOURE THE ONE WHO'S BEEN DODGING ALL MY QUESTIONS YOU SCUMFUCK

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:09 am

Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you

Yume · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:13 am

In post 350, Katsuki wrote:
In post 348, Ircher wrote:Yes, meh 0 Null.

Postie is my biggest scumread. Katsuki mainly cuz his refusal to answer Q / dodging all around / etc.
MY refusal to answer Q??? YOURE THE ONE WHO'S BEEN DODGING ALL MY QUESTIONS YOU SCUMFUCK

You are the one who refuses to explain stuff to me and others. >.>

Ircher · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:16 am

In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you

Why do you suggest only a 2p mafia team?

Katsuki · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:19 am

In post 352, Yume wrote:
In post 350, Katsuki wrote:
In post 348, Ircher wrote:Yes, meh 0 Null.

Postie is my biggest scumread. Katsuki mainly cuz his refusal to answer Q / dodging all around / etc.
MY refusal to answer Q??? YOURE THE ONE WHO'S BEEN DODGING ALL MY QUESTIONS YOU SCUMFUCK
You are the one who refuses to explain stuff to me and others. >.>

I already answered you out of respect for the fact that you're an IC, otherwise I would simply have ignored your comment.

Now I hope we can move on because I don't plan on addressing another post of yours on this matter.

Ircher · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:20 am

In post 317, Katsuki wrote:
In post 244, Ircher wrote:
In post 242, Katsuki wrote:
In post 225, Ircher wrote:
In post 175, Katsuki wrote:
In post 173, Ircher wrote:Wait, VOTE: Katsuki for not paying attn.
lol so what about it makes be scum?
Yume is confirmed town.
And so, how does that make me scum?
Not paying attn == More likely scum.
Now when was it assumed that I was not paying attention?

When you voted Yume, the conf!town IC, 10 pages in.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:30 am

In post 353, Ircher wrote:
In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you
Why do you suggest only a 2p mafia team?

sigh, read ircher, iso me and fucking read.

Yume · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:32 am

In post 354, Katsuki wrote:
In post 352, Yume wrote:
In post 350, Katsuki wrote:
In post 348, Ircher wrote:Yes, meh 0 Null.

Postie is my biggest scumread. Katsuki mainly cuz his refusal to answer Q / dodging all around / etc.
MY refusal to answer Q??? YOURE THE ONE WHO'S BEEN DODGING ALL MY QUESTIONS YOU SCUMFUCK
You are the one who refuses to explain stuff to me and others. >.>
I already answered you out of respect for the fact that you're an IC, otherwise I would simply have ignored your comment.

Now I hope we can move on because I don't plan on addressing another post of yours on this matter.

You answered simply 'this is not the case'. You never told me why or how or gave any info besides that.

Yume · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:33 am

If you refuse to explain why or how I might just wagon you instead.

Ircher · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:46 am

In post 356, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 353, Ircher wrote:
In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you
Why do you suggest only a 2p mafia team?
sigh, read ircher, iso me and fucking read.

You're dodging the Q: Why do you suggest

only 2p

team?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:47 am

In post 359, Ircher wrote:
In post 356, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 353, Ircher wrote:
In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you
Why do you suggest only a 2p mafia team?
sigh, read ircher, iso me and fucking read.
You're dodging the Q: Why do you suggest
only 2p
team?

have you iso'd me yet? you are going to feel really stupid

Ircher · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:56 am

In post 360, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 359, Ircher wrote:
In post 356, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 353, Ircher wrote:
In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you
Why do you suggest only a 2p mafia team?
sigh, read ircher, iso me and fucking read.
You're dodging the Q: Why do you suggest
only 2p
team?
have you iso'd me yet? you are going to feel really stupid

Yes. I know why you think Postie & I are scum, but you're still dodgingmy question.

Why do you suggest

only

2p

team?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:57 am

In post 307, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 298, SirCakez wrote:Yeah it's not priority, but town definitely wants to avoid being lynched....

So here is the math here from my point of view

13 people, I know I am town so 12 people left
Of those 12 I think it is fair to guess that 3 are anti town 3:10 is a very common ration 1:2:9 a bit less, but it's all the same here.
quote]

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:58 am

In post 362, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 307, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 298, SirCakez wrote:Yeah it's not priority, but town definitely wants to avoid being lynched....
So here is the math here from my point of view

13 people, I know I am town so 12 people left
Of those 12 I think it is fair to guess that 3 are anti town 3:10 is a very common ration 1:2:9 a bit less, but it's all the same here.

feel dumb yet?

Ircher · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:59 am

But, what makes you presume this setup has an SK is my Q?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:10 am

IRCHER READ!
Please I know you can read English! I'll bold things to help you out.
[quote]I think it is fair to guess that 3 are anti town

3:10 is a very common ratio 1:2:9 a bit less

Ircher · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:13 am

In post 364, Ircher wrote:But, what makes you presume this setup has an SK is my Q?

You said the scumteam is just me & Postie.

1+1=2.

Now, what makes you presume there's an SK in this setup?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:19 am

1+1+c > 2
^^^ that is what I said

Ircher · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:21 am

In post 351, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Calm down kat, I'm telling you it's a ircher postie team, don't let them get to you

1+1 = 2.

Never mentioned a "C" person

Katsuki · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:24 am

In post 358, Yume wrote:If you refuse to explain why or how I might just wagon you instead.

Go ahead and be as antitown as possible as a fucking IC. Knock yourself out, I give up.

Katsuki · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:25 am

Fate you can clean up this clownfest I'm done.

Yume · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:27 am

In post 369, Katsuki wrote:
In post 358, Yume wrote:If you refuse to explain why or how I might just wagon you instead.
Go ahead and be as antitown as possible as a fucking IC. Knock yourself out, I give up.

Why do you refuse to explain? It's simple, just say because X, Y and Z and I will lay off. It can't be that hard. :/

But since you aren't going to do it and prefer being stubborn, I'll ask someone else. Can someone tell me why she thinks her voting IC after confirmation is town?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:28 am

ircher I'm not going to argue math theory here, c stands for a constant. Sigh.

Katsuki · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:34 am

I gave you a response. You're just an absolute dumbfuck with a lack of comprehensive ability.

Yume · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:40 am

In post 373, Katsuki wrote:I gave you a response. You're just an absolute dumbfuck with a lack of comprehensive ability.

Where? Where did you say WHY it is not the case. You simply said 'this is not the case', you never said WHY. Or do you believe you should be excused for voting me after the confirmation by default?