Newbie 1715 (Game Over)

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:57 am

In post 649, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 644, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 641, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 640, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 638, crazycrabman wrote:Interesting night...

I feel that there is only one person who has reason to fear SirCakez.

In post 466, SirCakez wrote:LQ I think
Who is indeed probably scum
While LQ could have killed creature or Dwlee, that would be much more risky.
Why would that be more risky?

In post 638, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 456, SirCakez wrote:Town - Creature, crazycrabman
Nulltown - Dwlee, atm487
Null - Dragon of the West, eagersnake (having trouble sorting these two)
Scumlean - LQ
Scum - Tojam
Who else would have a reason to kill Sircakez? This was his last predictions. Nobody had a reason to kill Sircakez except LQ. For this reason, and the reasons stated before~ VOTE: LQ
I would not be that obvious to make that NK. I would have killed eagerSnakes who had a Townread on me.
1- Creature and Dwlee were more open about their reasons against you. Sircakez wasn't as active and would be easier to shrug off.

2- Because you wanted to knock off some competition. If you killed eagersnakez you would be more outnumbered. You want to keep eagersnakez around to diversify the viewpoint in your favor. For all we know eagersnakez could be your partner in crime...
I was already taking heat at EOD by a lot of people. The NK makes me look even more suspicious. Why would I take that risk?

P-Edit: Actually Killing Cakez is the worst NK I could have done. DWlee would have made a way better NK because they were more active itt and didn't have as strong of a Scum read on me.

1- NKing Sircakez has two benefits for you. Knocking off someone not in favor of you, and providing ammo to blame someone else.
2- Dwlee is more active. He's a bigger threat to yourself.

In post 564, Dwlee99 wrote:Town {Creature, Crab}
Town Lean {Sircakez, Eagersnake, atm, Dragon}
Null {} Maybe sircakez here?
Scum Lea {LicketyQuickety}
Scum {Tojam}
He had you as scum lean. The same as sircakez. Except being more active makes him a bigger threat, and too much of a risk. Sircakez was out of all of our minds, we all basically had him as null, which makes him an easier target.

Why are you buying that Scum wouldn't NK Cakez?

crazycrabman · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:58 am

In post 462, eagerSnake wrote:I'm fairly confident in my town reads on SirCakez, atm487, and crazycrabman. I have some doubt of DotWs and Creatures alignment. And more doubt of tojam, dwlee9, and LQ.

TBH I'm almost sure tojam will be lynched so I'm trying to figure out who his partner is if he shows up scum, or who the scum team is should he show up town.

He is true, where did you get that he had you as a town read?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:59 am

In post 651, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 462, eagerSnake wrote:I'm fairly confident in my town reads on SirCakez, atm487, and crazycrabman. I have some doubt of DotWs and Creatures alignment. And more doubt of tojam, dwlee9, and LQ.

TBH I'm almost sure tojam will be lynched so I'm trying to figure out who his partner is if he shows up scum, or who the scum team is should he show up town.
He is true, where did you get that he had you as a town read?

IDK.

crazycrabman · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:59 am

In post 650, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why are you buying that Scum wouldn't NK Cakez?

Because Cakez was NKed, and you are scum.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:01 am

In post 653, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 650, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why are you buying that Scum wouldn't NK Cakez?
Because Cakez was NKed, and you are scum.

I am not Scum tho, I am Town.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:02 am

BTW I'm thinking Creature is Town now.

crazycrabman · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:02 am

Why? Why should we believe that? With that said, I gtg. I'll be back in half an hour plus to answer your rebuttal.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:04 am

In post 656, crazycrabman wrote:Why? Why should we believe that? With that said, I gtg. I'll be back in half an hour plus to answer your rebuttal.

IDK why you should believe it. It was a good NK by Scum.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:18 am

NKA is all wifom, stop wasting time talking about it lol

eagerSnake · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:20 am

Have something better to talk about?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:22 am

idk dude >_>

eagerSnake · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:36 am

Dwlee9 had good motive to kill Sircakez also

crazycrabman · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:55 am

atm487 · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:57 am

well personally, we should wait for dwlee, these arguments should have the support of Dwlee, one of the Vets in this game. I would wait for dwlee before accusinf anyone

atm487 · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:58 am

nvm, dwlee, who are you voting for?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:00 pm

Night kill analysis, I'm not sure who I'm going to vote yet. I'm just playing some league and will look over some things and decide who to vote tonight.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:03 pm

In post 661, eagerSnake wrote:Dwlee9 had good motive to kill Sircakez also

how so?

crazycrabman · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:04 pm

In post 663, atm487 wrote:well personally, we should wait for dwlee, these arguments should have the support of Dwlee, one of the Vets in this game. I would wait for dwlee before accusinf anyone

You can't blindly follow the vets. For all we know, dwlee is scum.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:07 pm

In post 667, crazycrabman wrote:You can't blindly follow the vets. For all we know, dwlee is scum.

Or just straight up wrong >_>

Dwlee99 · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:09 pm

I think I've become addicted to the ">_>" face. I have used it so many times today

atm487 · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:24 pm

well i just trust dwlee, i can disagree with him, its just i will consider his opinion first because he is a vet

eagerSnake · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:24 pm

In post 666, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 661, eagerSnake wrote:Dwlee9 had good motive to kill Sircakez also
how so?

iirc he had a townlean read on you and you could use the kill to cast suspicion on someone else

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:42 pm

In post 670, atm487 wrote:well i just trust dwlee, i can disagree with him, its just i will consider his opinion first because he is a vet

Vets can be Scum too.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:44 pm

In post 671, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 666, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 661, eagerSnake wrote:Dwlee9 had good motive to kill Sircakez also
how so?
iirc he had a townlean read on you and you could use the kill to cast suspicion on someone else

and then come straight into day and say that speculating over why cakez was killed is pointless? really?

eagerSnake · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:07 pm

Why would dwlee9 want to dismiss information that helps town and could lead to the discovery of a mafia member?

A NK analysis is just as useful to town as lynch analysis.

Why would any townsperson want to dismiss ANY information, especially a NK?

With the limited info that townspeople have, Town-aligned people would not want to dismiss any information.

VOTE: Dwlee9