Newbie 1717: Newbies Through the Looking Glass (Game Over)


Forum rules
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #300 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:36 pm

Post by snoe »

'Sup y'all - gimme a little time to catch up please
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
User avatar
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
Smooth Criminal
Posts: 70566
Joined: February 24, 2013
Contact:

Post Post #301 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:11 pm

Post by RadiantCowbells »

OK. Tomorrow!
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #302 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:41 pm

Post by innocentvillager »

In post 300, snoe wrote:'Sup y'all - gimme a little time to catch up please
Hurry.

VOTE: snoe
User avatar
Accountant
Accountant
Self-Evident
User avatar
User avatar
Accountant
Self-Evident
Self-Evident
Posts: 6419
Joined: May 16, 2015
Location: Wonderland

Post Post #303 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:46 pm

Post by Accountant »

Welcome, snoe!
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.

You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #304 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:58 pm

Post by snoe »

UNVOTE: unvote
Thanks Acct. Everyone, I'll have thoughts/vote in about 11 hours - gotta sleep. We did get 48 hours extension.
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #305 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 7:04 pm

Post by innocentvillager »

Lmao @mod Grace hasn't posted in like 5 days, can we get a prod on her?
User avatar
Lycanfire
Lycanfire
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Lycanfire
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2206
Joined: June 4, 2016

Post Post #306 (ISO) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 7:29 pm

Post by Lycanfire »

In post 282, innocentvillager wrote:I can't figure out what you're saying by this post, decrypt it for me plz?
Sure... I considered you or Mizzy as directing attention towards Meepo/Accountant/Grace for no reason. Mizzy offered a lot more and seemed well enough in line with her usual play. You left a question that was already answered twice and it seemed clear to me that you were happy if people kept talking about useless things. At this point, the IC was busy ripping into a newbie and another newbie had no idea what was going on. It's fine if they wanted to have a go at one another, but others needed to drag more people in this. I stepped up to the plate and chose you.
In post 282, innocentvillager wrote:Okay sure, well if you read my responses I've basically responded to that.
where. because i really, really need to see this rebuttal.
User avatar
Xalxe
Xalxe
He/him
It's pronounced "Xalxe"
User avatar
User avatar
Xalxe
He/him
It's pronounced "Xalxe"
It's pronounced "Xalxe"
Posts: 4127
Joined: January 20, 2010
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Post Post #307 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:36 am

Post by Xalxe »

Vote Count 1.8

Why is a raven like a writing-desk?


snoe
(2): Accountant, innocentvillager
Accountant
(1): Postie
innocentvillager
(1): Lycanfire

Not Voting
: Grace, RadiantCowbells, Simoyd, Harkonnen97, snoe
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-24 07:25:57)


Grace
is being prodded.
"I, too, would prefer to know the Xalxe of my demise." - Felissan, 2022
- On this day in history: mundanity, and terror, and food, and love, and trees -
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
User avatar
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
Smooth Criminal
Posts: 70566
Joined: February 24, 2013
Contact:

Post Post #308 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 2:45 am

Post by RadiantCowbells »

I am mostly freed up but haven't slept. I am going to sleep now, when I wake up this is my #1 priority.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
User avatar
Simoyd
Simoyd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Simoyd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 360
Joined: May 2, 2016
Location: Ontario

Post Post #309 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:34 am

Post by Simoyd »

In post 299, Xalxe wrote:snoe replaces Pants98
Thank Jesus!
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #310 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:03 am

Post by snoe »

Hi everybody … this game is a lot more complicated than it looked when I checked it out after Pants’s first prod-dodge. Sorry it took me so long to go through it. :(

I’ll start with my vote, explained in my reads below:
VOTE: postie

Here are my reads:

Town leaning:
Harkonnen (Meepo): Meepo’s posts stink of sincere newbie town, and Harkonnen has added to that impression.
Grace: Biggest point against her is relative inactivity. Come back, Grace!
Simoyd: over-reaching on his reads on Meepo and Accountant, but I see it as sincere efforts to solve the game.

Conflicted:
Accountant vs. RC:
Overall, I think Accountant has contributed to the town game and RC has not. However, Accountant has also done some things I don’t like. 1) Aggressive play against newbies (Meepo and Grace) mixed in with IC statements during page 1-2. 2) Post 114, claiming they haven’t done any reaction tests. If that’s a sarcastic response, fine. But later responses suggest it’s a straight claim, and it seems false to me. Waiting for more from RC.

Lycan vs IV:
Lycan’s case against IV is based on IV’s page 2 post challenging the sudden serious turn during RVS, and IV’s responses to Lycan’s challenges. I agree with IV that it was weird to get so serious so fast. Scum hunting early on Day 1 is fine; it is weird for it to get so deep in the weeds with only a few players posting. I don’t think this was anyone’s “fault,” but the combo of Accountant’s aggressive play and newbie uncertainty made the dialogue focus on that more than was healthy.
Some of IV’s responses these challenges seem weak: post 52 (responding to Mizz), 262 (OMGUS read on Lycan).

Scum leaning:
Mizz/Postie: Sorry, Postie, you seem nice, but Mizz’s play seemed scummy to me. Especially posts 30 & 51 in early game; sheeping Acct in 81 & 82.

Finally, here are my notes on reading through the game. They are long - sorry. But I think it’s worth posting them because …
1) One of the few benefits of getting a replacement player is getting a new set of eyes looking at the game. Might help?
2) I need to give you all SOMETHING with which to read my slot. Pants, bless him … didn’t.
3) I usually phone post (meaning I don’t do giant formatted posts like this often) - would like to have this available when I’m on my phone.

Here are the notes - the spoiler sections each end with a vote count, except the last one:

#5-45:
Spoiler:
Posts 5-8: Innocent RVS play by Mizz and Meepo
Post 9: Accountant kicks off a bunch of hurt and confused reactions by challenging Meepo’s vote and Grace’s response. Good responses from Grace & Meepo as they figure out how Acct is playing, Good response from IV in #27 questioning the whole dialogue. Acct plays pretty hard. Don’t like #24 accusing Grace of lying.
(IMHO, it was kind of bad sportsmanship by Acct to mix aggressive play with IC-role posting, but YMMV on that; it turned out to be instructive, certainly.)
#30: post by Mizz that tries too hard. Mixes scattershot attacks with defensiveness. Don’t agree with the reaches in reasoning in the final synthesis paragraph.
In post 30, Mizzytastic wrote: - @Meepo, why the random vote on me, as opposed to anyone else? And if it's not a serious vote, why give a serious sounding reason for it? I personally like RVS wagons, it's one of the efficient ways to get out of it.

- @Grace, I was going after innocentvillager. I never implied Meepo was culpable for anything.

- @Accountant, why didn't you pick up on the above?

- You gave up the acting smart act quick. Generally i find people trying to look smart don't back down so easily. Sounds fake

- @Grace, is Meepo town?

- @Grace, seems to me more like you want us to think you aren't clever - or at least you've mentioned that more? Why?

- I read this as Accountant being intentionally overblown for reaction but thinking there was something potentially scummy there. The aim of silly voting is to get out of silly voting and into serious discussion.

- @Grace, Apart from missing that I never accussed Meepo of anything, Accountant seems calm and rational. What did you hope to gain from a made up case?

- @Grace, Is Accountant worried or agressive? These don't seem to naturally go hand in hand for me. And why should you have voted for someone who wouldn't have taken it seriously, what benefit does that have for town?

- @innocentvillager, Deadly. :wink: You have a problem with how the day has progressed so far?

- Sometimes it doesn't get serious this quick, but the quicker it does the better it is for town. To me wanting to move into serious stuff is a good thing. And attacking serious sounding made up cases is a good thing.

- @Meepo, you nervous if they aren't?


Don't like innocentvillager's post coming from an SE. Even if it's not his style of play I'd expect an SE to be aware this what start of day can look like. Not sure if Grace looks more like newbscum or newbtown, but she hasn't handled pressure well so I'm not that worried about sorting her in time. Main thing I don't like is someone who was supposedly starting this game trying to look clever keeps falling back on not being clever or on being new - that behaviour seems contradictory to me. Biggest thing making me think newbtown is a possibility is that I think newbscum is less likely to go for the IC, and scum in general is unlikely to admit they made everything up - though the latter is tempered by the fact she is using being new as a defence. Meepo is nullish - I would like to see more from him. Accountant looks like town scumhunting, with the caveat I'd be surprised if the IC looked like anything else this early in the game. Still, happy to go with Accountant as town for now until something questionable presents itself.

I think I will leave my vote where it is until we see more from innocentvillager, though I don't feel opposed to voting Grace. If this is what we get with some questioning and one vote, I'd love to see what happens with more.
Kicks off back and forth with IV and Grace about whether it’s normal for RVS to get so real so fast, plus back-and-forth with Meepo about some of Mizz’s points.
41: RC shows up, pokes Acct with a stick.
In post 45, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.1

It’s no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then.


Accountant
(2): Grace, RadiantCowbells
innocentvillager
(1): Mizzytastic
Mizzytastic
(1): Meepo
Grace
(1): Accountant

Not Voting
: Simoyd, Lycanfire, Pants98, innocentvillager
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)

Post 46-77
Spoiler:
#46: Lycan provides their take. Interesting that they see IV manipulating pace, as Mizzy said in #30. I disagree with both; it seems pretty natural to be surprised by the pivot into seriousness that Acct kicked off. But I don’t know IV’s meta and Lycan claims to.
51: Mizz pushes IV on not scum hunting yet; IV complains about the “noise” level in the game; IV’s response bugs me as fake:
In post 52, innocentvillager wrote:Yeah but it was just so much so fast and sometimes games like this have a lot of noise that makes it annoying to read. It's foreshadowing that this is going to be an extremely long game, which I don't really like.

I'm like goldilocks and the three bitches. Too much activity and I sit back and skim like a bitch, too little activity and I'll fill the thread with bullshit, otherwise it's just right
#60: Pants shows up in my slot, votes RC with some inside joke. Simoyd shows up. Grace and Pants throw some shade. Sim throws shade back at Grace, Lycan. Calls out IV on his meta in #71. Really dislike posts 73-74 from Sim:
In post 73, Simoyd wrote:
In post 35, Meepo wrote:I am pretty sure
Deferring your certainty until it matters? Setting the stage for future slips?
In post 74, Simoyd wrote:there's not a whole lot of seriousness other than this. Not sure what else to ask.... I'm liking Grace and Meepo for scum right now... Meepo started it so...

VOTE: Meepo

I'm off to play with my oculus. I'll be back later tonight
I like Lycan’s response in 75 for tone.
76: Acct OMGUS votes RC
In post 77, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.2

But I don’t want to go among mad people.
- Oh, you can’t help that, we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.


Accountant
(2): Grace, RadiantCowbells
innocentvillager
(2): Mizzytastic, Lycanfire
RadiantCowbells
(2): Pants98, Accountant
Mizzytastic
(1): Meepo
Meepo
(1): Simoyd

Not Voting
: innocentvillager
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)

Posts 78-
Spoiler:
78: Acct gives reads. Grace town, Meep scum, IV null, Mizz scum. Votes Mizz. Excellent post, except I do not see the case against Meepo at all.
81: Mizz responds with a half-sheep by switching vote to Meep. Also deflection to Grace as well with this BS “trying to look smart” business.
82: Mizz sheeps Acct’s criticism of Lycan’s use of meta.
In post 82, Mizzytastic wrote:Lycan, you seem to be relying a lot on meta. I dunno about IV but I know you've not seen my scum game because I've not seen my scum game. What makes you think this is town aggression and not just me aggression?
#84&85 are also bad pushes.
88: Meepo defends, 89 Acct accepts defense. Feels genuine both ways?
92: Lycan responds to Mizz/Acct, gives reads:
In post 92, Lycanfire wrote:I was hoping to be pushed back by now. IV said he didn't have time to post much, left a low content post that I didn't like. I called it and he spoke about being burnt out and hasn't been helping us any since.

Town
Meepo

Lean Town
Accountant (IC)
Simoyd
RadiantCowbells (SE)

Null
Mizzytastic
Grace
Pants98 (SE)

Lean Scum

Scum
innocentvillager (SE)
97: Simoyd presses Mizz on post 81, Mizz defends pretty well in post 100, Sim pushes more in 101.
#102: Pants strikes again: pushes Mizz on pushing lycan on pushing IV using meta. Not one of our prouder moments, especially because Mizz kind of slid into that position by sheeping Acct.
#104: First long post from IV. Slight town reads on Lycan, Accountant, whoops there goes the town read on Lycan! Votes Lycan. IV kind of promised a lot and delivered a little with this post, but that’s NAI to me.
106: Lycan pushes back. Tone is sincere but there is some bad reasoning that smacks of tunneling.
In post 106, Lycanfire wrote:You thought my first post was fine, ignore the premise, tunnel heavily on the meta portion to the point of giving me towncred, and then when I dismiss meta as primary motive you suddenly want to make it about metagaming again.

I never claimed "extensive meta research" on you. I claimed 1 town game of yours to 1 town game of Mizzy's, while skimming through your ISOs of other games to save time. I didn't need to compare a scum game to your town game to call your town game out of character here(to which you somewhat agreed). You were behaving more strangely than Mizzy, and that's why you're the one I placed my vote on. The moment you stopped posting was the moment I thought lean scum was too tame, because while waiting others did not cease accusing each other. Scum aren't in a hurry to contribute here if accused as each new post they aren't involved in offers opportunities. So, what about town? It would be in a townie's interest to make a meaningful post ASAP if they were the one being accused.
104: Acct pushes Lycan’s response
In post 110, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.3

How do you know I’m mad?
- You must be, or you wouldn’t have come here.


Accountant
(2): Grace, RadiantCowbells
Mizzytastic
(2): Meepo, Accountant
Meepo
(2): Simoyd, Mizzytastic
innocentvillager
(1): Lycanfire
RadiantCowbells
(1): Pants98
Lycanfire
(1): innocentvillager

Not Voting
:
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)

Post 111-
Spoiler:
In post 112, Simoyd wrote:VOTE: Accountant

I consistently don't like the direction of your reads. I think you can only hide behind reaction testing for so long... Still a long time left for today so things might change, but you've definitely made my top scum read.
In post 114, Accountant wrote:I've never done a single reaction test this entire game, and I don't know why people thought I did. :|
Okay, Sim’s scum reading based on disagreement, which … I disagree with, but Acct straight up shameless in response. Unless “reaction test” means something different than the obvious definition.
Then Sim ISOs Acct:
In post 120, Simoyd wrote:
Accountant:


Post looks like you might be bussing your partner, innocentvillager. You certainly don't think this is enough to wrap up the game. If not bussing, then is this a reaction test?

In post through you're tunneling really hard on Grace. I feel that post and at the very latest post clearly show her true colors, and continuing to tunnel seems to have yielded very little, if any value. I just get the impression that your motivation to tunnel was to keep up the bussing facade and not to find scum like town would.

How is post not a reaction test? Why would town OMGUS (post )?

post you flip around and write a pretty big section dedicated to not only defending innocentvillager, but trying to make people feel stupid for reading him badly. Why defend? Didn't he already basically say everything you said already, other than making other people feel stupid? And making people feel stupid like that isn't a reaction test how?

In the same post you also attack Mizzy, saying her post is bad when 80% of it basically just looks like parroting of your own opinion earlier in the game, other than attacking your buddy innocentvillager. How is anyone expected to strike the heart of someone at this point? Why is jabbing and poking any different than what RC has done? Why no mention of that being bad for RC? So again, what is this then... reaction test? How do you differentiate between Mizzy appearing to look active and actually looking active at this point in the game?

For post I think you're right and are trying to get RC to help you drive the town in the wrong direction. Since when does town ever ask someone to sheep them? AGAIN is this a reaction test? What is this? Why did you say this?

post : again defending innocentvillager. This seems to be a reoccuring theme...

post : for all the seriousness you've been portraying why say this? Maybe I'm missing something here. @Lycanfire: was post serious?

post : Liking me is the obvious scum choice because I'm terrible at this game and obvious newb town. Attacking mizzie again for no good reason... I think the meepo wagon has really bottomed out and there's not really anything to push. This is besides the fact that I was voting meepo and not pushing either, but you like me?

post : I would like to see a detailed explaination on why you think that post seems nowbie townie and meaningful... I think IV is your buddy. You immidiatly respond positivly and defend him again in the moment he's under fire... What is that!
Hm. Sim is missing humor in some of Acct’s posts or else I am wrong in finding them funny. Overall bad reads but the tone is townish. I think. This is a little cute: “post 103: Liking me is the obvious scum choice because I'm terrible at this game and obvious newb town. Attacking mizzie again for no good reason... I think the meepo wagon has really bottomed out and there's not really anything to push. This is besides the fact that I was voting meepo and not pushing either, but you like me?”

Then Acct in 124:
In post 124, Accountant wrote:
You certainly don't think this is enough to wrap up the game. If not bussing, then is this a reaction test?
It certainly was enough to wrap up the game if Meepo had been serious. But he later said he was joking.
I just get the impression that your motivation to tunnel was to keep up the bussing facade and not to find scum like town would.
I tunneled on Grace because I wasn't sure of her alignment yet. 13 and 16 may have been enough for you to determine her true colors, but it wasn't enough for me. People respond under pressure - that response shows me their alignment. Afterwards I townread Grace since her respond was townie.
Why would town OMGUS (post 80)?
Because I knew that RC's initial vote on me was just him playing games as usual, so I voted him back to show my displeasure. In addition, this was something of a placeholder vote, and after I completed my analysis I ended up voting Mizzy.
Why defend?
Because people were attacking him unreasonably and I wanted to put a stop to that.
And making people feel stupid like that isn't a reaction test how?
Please explain how my post made people feel stupid.
In the same post you also attack Mizzy, saying her post 30 is bad when 80% of it basically just looks like parroting of your own opinion earlier in the game
Indeed - just because someone is sheeping me doesn't mean that their posts are magically good.
How is anyone expected to strike the heart of someone at this point?
I don't expect Mizzy to strike at the heart of anyone. If she doesn't have something real to scumhunt, she be honest and say that she can't find any openings to question rather than trying to look good by jabbing aimlessly.
Why is jabbing and poking any different than what RC has done?
RC's meta isn't to jab and poke, it's to make naked votes and one liners or 20 pages and then jump on someone and deathtunnel them. In addition, I'm wary of trying to sort RC early because I find him difficult to read.
How do you differentiate between Mizzy appearing to look active and actually looking active at this point in the game?
I assume you meant actually "being" active here. My response is that the difference is the intent and direction of her questions. I don't see the pointedness and the "driving" that would lead me to believe she has a concrete idea of how each question helps to sort player alignments.
Since when does town ever ask someone to sheep them?
What is wrong with town asking someone to sheep them? To "sheep" someone means to follow their lead and vote who they vote - if a town member is confident they've found a good player to vote, they should want the rest of the town to vote with them.
again defending innocentvillager. This seems to be a reoccuring theme...
Of course I'm defending him. He's literally awol and people are rushing to jump down his throat.
Liking me is the obvious scum choice because I'm terrible at this game and obvious newb town.
Liking you is the obvious
town
choice, too. If you're obvious newb town, that means that I, as a town member, should want to read you as town.
This is besides the fact that I was voting meepo and not pushing either, but you like me?
I think you were doing this in a sort of clueless town way, rather than Mizzy's deceptive manner.
I would like to see a detailed explaination on why you think that post seems nowbie townie and meaningful...
You misunderstand. IV, in his post, questioned why I townread Meepo. I said that Meepo as a whole seemed genuine.
I think IV is your buddy. You immidiatly respond positivly and defend him again in 107 the moment he's under fire... What is that!
Why do you think that me defending IV means that we both have to be scum together? That's a ridiculous line of thinking. All town would defend another player who they feel to be unfairly attacked, which IV was. My actual read on IV is nullish, so anyone who reads him otherwise is either seeing something I don't(unlikely, since there's nothing much to see from 1 post and some V/LA declarations) or outright wrong.

In Conclusion

I feel that your erroneous scum read on me is due to a number of misunderstandings about my play and horrible misconceptions about how town should react. Your logic and hasty pre-flip associatives are bad and do not hold in the face of closer examination. You also seem to fundamentally misunderstand the point of many of my posts, like declaring them to be reaction tests when they're anything but. In the light of this, there can be no further reason to suspect I am scum.
This actually kinda stinks. Taking Sim’s half-baked ideas seriously? Saying that you were seriously tunneling Grace on page 1 of the game? I hope this is like high-level sarcasm.
125: IV sees 124 like I did.
126: Acct plays it cool. IDK. Then pushes Mizz in 128.
In post 129, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.4

Begin at the beginning, and go on till you come to the end: then stop.


Accountant
(3): Grace, RadiantCowbells, Simoyd
Mizzytastic
(2): Meepo, Accountant
Meepo
(1): Mizzytastic
innocentvillager
(1): Lycanfire
RadiantCowbells
(1): Pants98
Lycanfire
(1): innocentvillager

Not Voting
:
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)
{/spoiler]
Spoiler:

130: Lycan suspects Acct’s “defend IV so hard”; this is really stretching
Pants takes Acct to L-1 in 132 without saying anything. Takes deserved shit from Acct, Meepo, Lycan, IV.
148: IV pushes back on IC’s response to Sim in 124.
155: RC hits Acct again with nothing. “Note that Accountant hasn't said anything to me.” Well, there was not much to respond to.
156-163: Lycan and Sim push Acct more
164: Acct makes a good response
In post 164, Accountant wrote:
In post 161, Lycanfire wrote:
In post 160, Accountant wrote:
I don't like his newest post#154 because it sounds like a "validate my scumread" post.
If Grace goes "hey Mizzy is obvtown" and lists a bunch of reasons wouldn't that completely defeat the purpose of it?
Does scumAccountant have anything to lose at this point?
scum!Accountant has quite a lot to lose. The wagon on me was dead in the water after Grace backed off; like you said, nobody was applying a lot of pressure. It makes no sense to characterize this as a desperate move.
168-179: lot of back-and-forth between Sim and Acct. Acct is making stronger cases, but there is a coolness of tone that seems forced.
In post 180, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.5

Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.


Accountant
(3): RadiantCowbells, Simoyd, Pants98
Mizzytastic
(2): Meepo, Accountant
Meepo
(1): Mizzytastic
innocentvillager
(1): Lycanfire
Pants98
(1): innocentvillager

Not Voting
: Grace
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)


Prodding
Pants98
and
Meepo
.
181-187 more of same
188: grace returns, sincere-sounding reads
194-199: back-and-forth between RC, Acct, and Lycan about RC’s relatively low interactions. Acct challenges Lycan’s challenge of RC. Possible that Lycan was sheeping Grace’s scum read on RC, Acct is challenging that”
203: Postie replaces Mizz, says Acct needs rope. Reason:
In post 205, Postie wrote:Because you began the day by immediately pushing a load of contrived-sounding terribleness to advocate for a lynch on obvtown.
Agree that Acct’s aggressiveness towards newbie players right out of the gate was not good; also think it’s a weak reason for lynch 7 pages later. But Postie makes good point in 214
In post 214, Postie wrote:
In post 114, Accountant wrote:I've never done a single reaction test this entire game, and I don't know why people thought I did. :|
Nevermind found my answer.
Yeah you're just scum sorry.
224: Acct challenges RC, again based on meta/prior games. This may be totally correct, but does not help players who don’t know RC make up their minds.
229: IV questions RC’s unvoting of Acct. To me, RC’s decision makes total sense; don’t leave a player at L-1 if you’re unsure and going to be away. Except Acct was at L-2. RC comes back at 231 to explain, makes sense.
In post 241, Xalxe wrote:
Vote Count 1.6

Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
-That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.


Accountant
(2): Simoyd, Pants98
Mizzytastic
(2): Meepo, Accountant
Meepo
(1): Postie
innocentvillager
(1): Lycanfire
Pants98
(1): innocentvillager

Not Voting
: Grace, RadiantCowbells
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-06-22 07:25:57)


I am seeking replacements for both
Pants98
and
Meepo
.

post 242-
Spoiler:
242: Pants is back! promises to be back soon.
244: Lycan null-reads Grace. Don’t agree with reasoning but this post seems townish, just misguided:
In post 244, Lycanfire wrote:
In post 220, Simoyd wrote:@Lycanfire: What is your read on grace?
@RC: What is your read on grace?

Even if it's just off the top of your head...
Null. I don't like her constant shucks posts-ok this is a newbie game but riding that horse attempts to invoke empathy. If I do that will I be more likely to see her as town? Yes.

I'm at work but in my data I believe she has never interacted with IV (still my tentative top scum choice until I see more) while IV has interacted with her once. Or it's the other way around-I can't access the file.
Lycan also continues with scum reading IV.
248: IV responds to Lycan. This jumps out at me:
In post 248, innocentvillager wrote:Accountant's defense of me, while slightly odd I agree, was completely right. I didn't need to do any more defense of myself when Accountant had given basically the same defense I would've given, why put in the extra time?
I don’t think Acct’s defense was “slightly odd”. It made sense.

251: Harkonnen enters, with reads. Totally agree with his town read on Grace. Town read on Simoyd thinner - I don’t think challenging the IC is necessarily so scary for scum. Town read on RC - mmm, okay, but I see RC as more “don’t give a fuck” about this game (sincere or fake). Overall, liking the post. Liking the slot, because Meepo seemed town. Bye, Meepo
256: RC says Acct needs rope, again.
255 & 257: Lycan asks if there’s a better lynch than Pants, Acct answers just RC
258: Hark calls OMGUS on Acct’s RC lynch call
260: Lycan continues on IV. I think Lycan is tunneling here, but it may be townish tunneling. Lycan says “Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv”, which is true but ignores that IV may be as busy as Lycan is.
261: IV disrespects the life of a retail worker. This is so wrong: “Bruh how long does it take to read briefly through one or two scum games and get an impression? Probably way less time than it takes to write that post of yours. “
262: IV posts reads. The scum read on Lycan strikes me as OMGUS.
263: RC posits an IV/Acct scum team.
266: Lycan posts an association-based take on the game so far, rejecting a Pants or Acct lynch. IV responds. I think these two are talking past each other.
269: Lycan says “You're still ignoring my tell I pointed out in my first post. If you called my premise silly rather than complain all game I would have unvoted you ages ago.” The tell in question (I think) is
In post 46, Lycanfire wrote:'m reading him as manipulating the pace of the game.
273: Postie says:
In post 273, Postie wrote:I don't let people into my townpool willy-nilly. I can dig through IV's ISO and find what he said to make me townread him if you like, but I'm fairly sure he's town.
It's either Accountant/Pants or Accountant/Lycan.
274: Acct asks “why Lycan”
275: Postie says she’s town reading everyone else but Lycan and Acct and Pants
279: Pants prod-dodges again
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #311 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:14 am

Post by innocentvillager »

Okay, the scumteam is very likely Lycan/snoe.
User avatar
Postie
Postie
Any/all
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Postie
Any/all
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5009
Joined: August 10, 2015
Pronoun: Any/all

Post Post #312 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:17 am

Post by Postie »

In post 311, innocentvillager wrote:Okay, the scumteam is very likely Lycan/snoe.
Why?
Discourse is fleeting, but junk mail is forever.
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:41 am

Post by snoe »

What Postie said: why me & Lycan?
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:23 am

Post by innocentvillager »

In post 312, Postie wrote:
In post 311, innocentvillager wrote:Okay, the scumteam is very likely Lycan/snoe.
Why?
I've made my case on Lycan multiple times; I really don't want to do it again, but you want, I can.

Pants's L-1 vote was horrible and way too scummy for an SE.

Snoe is doing a great job of appearing town, but it looks fake.
In post 310, snoe wrote:Finally, here are my notes on reading through the game. They are long - sorry. But I think it’s worth posting them because …
1) One of the few benefits of getting a replacement player is getting a new set of eyes looking at the game. Might help?
2) I need to give you all SOMETHING with which to read my slot. Pants, bless him … didn’t.
3) I usually phone post (meaning I don’t do giant formatted posts like this often) - would like to have this available when I’m on my phone.
Okay, IMO this is just him begging to be townread. If this isn't fake I don't know what is. It's basically posting useless shit and going like "I know I'm posting useless shit but plz don't scumread me for it." Doesn't change the fact that the notes are entirely for show and an effort to be more transparently town. Whenever people clearly try to look town and go out of their way to provide transparency in their "thoughts", that rings alarm bells for me. Natural vs forced towntelling--this reeks of the latter.

Also, from my experience scum love to do shit like this, where you're trying to make it look like you're helping town but you're really not helping town.

Don't believe me? Let's look at his notes. Most of the notes are just summaries of random posts that are COMPLETELY NAI. Why write so much summary text, if most of it is just going to be NAI? More scumpoints for attempting to look useful without being useful. I could quote them all but there's way too many for me to quote--if you really want me to quote more, I can. But honestly just read through it and JUST TRY and tell me that 90% of his "notes" don't contribute nothing to reads, are completely NAI, useless, you get it.

Okay, so the only way I see any of this as town is that he felt the need to take comprehensive notes, so he must've written these notes first and then drawn his reads from looking at these notes, right? But he doesn't even do that. Take his read on Mizzy, for example:
In post 310, snoe wrote:Especially posts 30 & 51 in early game; sheeping Acct in 81 & 82.
He does explain 30, 81, and 82 in the notes, but where is 51?? He makes no real mention of 51 in his notes. So where did that scumread come from? These clearly aren't comprehensive notes, which alone proves that he didn't just take extensive notes, and then draw reads from that. So what's the alternative? Well, in my mind there are a couple of possibilities. He insincerely bullshitted some notes, and maybe took some reads from those notes but also looked back at the thread for a lot of analysis. But if he had to look back at the thread, why take the notes in the first place?? That defeats the purpose of the notes. If he can't even use his own notes effectively to make his reads, how does that make his notes OR reads genuine? The other main possibility is that he wrote the reads concurrently with the notes. This would make it less scummish than the first scenario, but it's still not good, since then there is still really no point in writing the notes in the first place. Finally, the last possibility is that he wrote the reads first. This is the scummiest of all, and if this one is true, he needs to be autolynched. In any of the three cases, they read fake, fake, effort to appear town, fake, etc.

The notes themselves just give me a huge scumvibe. There's so many accusations and random "I like this post!"s just being thrown around with no weight. As scum, I notice people when they make scummy posts, because I'm really making an effort to look for them. I'm thinking, I know everyone here is town, so every post seems extra towny. The moment I see something not townie, I point it out, so I can come up with an excuse to find people scummy. But that's all it ever is: accusations that die. There's no life to his accusations, no desire to look more into these conflicts, only listing them as conflicts. He picks the one scumread he had for the 3 pages or so since that happens to be the easiest, safest choice without stirring up conflict especially since Mizzy was a) pretty widely accused but more importantly b) has literally replaced out, so there's no one to take the blame. He doesn't even attack Postie at all, just Mizzy for like 3 posts that weren't even that bad. So he's done all this "analysis" where he's throwing scumreads everywhere in his notes, tries to stay impartial to the major conflicts going on but just lists them as "conflicted". This right here, while maybe a bit intangible, is a big deal breaker for me.

As far as snoe and Lycan being a scumteam together, I initially thought I saw snoe subtly buddying Lycan, despite listing him under "Conflicted" which was a huge association tell for me (SUBTLE buddying is an association tell, HARD buddying is NI). But I realized while reading through this that he's done this to all four players listed under "Conflicted". I can only conclude that it is likely one of these four players is the scumbuddy, and it's obviously not me, so Lycan/Accountant/RC. I can't read RC, Accountant is kind of scummy, but Lycan is the worst of the three so it seems logical that Lycan/snoe are a scumteam.

Addressing various posts:
In post 310, snoe wrote:Good response from IV in #27 questioning the whole dialogue
So he says this.
In post 310, snoe wrote: 51: Mizz pushes IV on not scum hunting yet; IV complains about the “noise” level in the game; IV’s response bugs me as fake:
In post 52, innocentvillager wrote:Yeah but it was just so much so fast and sometimes games like this have a lot of noise that makes it annoying to read. It's foreshadowing that this is going to be an extremely long game, which I don't really like.

I'm like goldilocks and the three bitches. Too much activity and I sit back and skim like a bitch, too little activity and I'll fill the thread with bullshit, otherwise it's just right
But then says this. He agreed with me that it was good to question the dialogue, but he finds it fake when I complain about the noise level?? In what world does that make sense?
snoe wrote:262: IV posts reads. The scum read on Lycan strikes me as OMGUS.
What SE still uses OMGUS as a scumtell? This is a tell that maybe a beginner mafia player would use.

But even so, this has nothing to do with OMGUS. I had been scumreading Lycan for most of the game, and I gave reasons for my scumread and voted Lycan before I made that reads post. You admit yourself that Lycan's initial case on me was asinine and a stretch.
In post 310, snoe wrote:261: IV disrespects the life of a retail worker. This is so wrong: “Bruh how long does it take to read briefly through one or two scum games and get an impression? Probably way less time than it takes to write that post of yours. “
I never disrespected the life of a retail worker. I've worked a couple jobs at the same time before, and it sucks. But while Lycan claims he's so busy, his post count and posting frequency would disagree with that. You can't deny that Lycan has been posting a fair amount, so no matter how busy he is, he clearly could have taken time to briefly read a scumgame of mine instead of post once or twice in the thread. It REALLY does not take that long, and should be what a townie would do if he's so intent on me being scum.
User avatar
Simoyd
Simoyd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Simoyd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 360
Joined: May 2, 2016
Location: Ontario

Post Post #315 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:37 am

Post by Simoyd »

"Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv"

^ Can someone explain this to me. I guess I'm missing the obvious but wouldn't scum be more motivated to defend themselves because they have more to lose from dying? Even in this game people have commented that forced or excessive defending is a scum tell. How is the opposite (not posting, so not defending) also a scum tell??
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #316 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:38 am

Post by innocentvillager »

In post 315, Simoyd wrote:"Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv"

^ Can someone explain this to me. I guess I'm missing the obvious but wouldn't scum be more motivated to defend themselves because they have more to lose from dying? Even in this game people have commented that forced or excessive defending is a scum tell. How is the opposite (not posting, so not defending) also a scum tell??
You're not missing anything, you are correct. They (Lycan and snoe, the scumteam) are incorrect.
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #317 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:43 am

Post by innocentvillager »

In post 306, Lycanfire wrote:
In post 282, innocentvillager wrote:I can't figure out what you're saying by this post, decrypt it for me plz?
Sure... I considered you or Mizzy as directing attention towards Meepo/Accountant/Grace for no reason. Mizzy offered a lot more and seemed well enough in line with her usual play. You left a question that was already answered twice and it seemed clear to me that you were happy if people kept talking about useless things. At this point, the IC was busy ripping into a newbie and another newbie had no idea what was going on. It's fine if they wanted to have a go at one another, but others needed to drag more people in this. I stepped up to the plate and chose you.

If you're referring to the question answered twice, are you seriously still scumreading me for my "wtf are you guy srs" post or whatever? I already clarified what I meant by that, and it wasn't the same meaning as the previous questions asked. READ. MY. POSTS.

Happy if people kept talking about useless things? I made a whole post where I told people to STOP posting useless things! Why don't you read my posts?

In post 282, innocentvillager wrote:Okay sure, well if you read my responses I've basically responded to that.
where. because i really, really need to see this rebuttal.
ARE YOU SERIOUS? WHY DON'T YOU READ WHAT I WRITE?? Did just not exist?? Do you only choose to read/respond to the things that benefit you?


I'm so done trying to converse with you. I don't understand how you can't scumread Lycan at this point. Misrepping, not reading posts, insincere meta, tunneling, stretchy reasoning, insincere scumhunting, etc, etc, etc.
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #318 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:44 am

Post by innocentvillager »

Sorry, my formatting of that post was awful, the bold wasn't intended to make it more obnoxious, it was just supposed to indicate my reply vs his
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #319 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:46 am

Post by snoe »

In post 314, innocentvillager wrote:Okay, so the only way I see any of this as town is that he felt the need to take comprehensive notes, so he must've written these notes first and then drawn his reads from looking at these notes, right
Exactly what I did, except I did some last-minute ISOs before coming up with reads.
Look, I parachuted into a slot that at its most charitable reads extremely lazy town. I don't judge here - pants may have had all kinds of real-life drama going on.
I thought giving my moment-by-moment reactions would do something to help make up for Pants's inactivity.
It was a call I debated making, believe you me.

When I get home and can do a detailed rebuttal to the rest of your critique, I will. Few hours.
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
User avatar
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
Smooth Criminal
Posts: 70566
Joined: February 24, 2013
Contact:

Post Post #320 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:47 am

Post by RadiantCowbells »

VOTE: Accountant

Postie, what's your Snoe read?
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #321 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:50 am

Post by innocentvillager »

Okay peoplz we have 3.5 days left. We need to start forming a wagon, or we're not going to have enough time to make an informed lynch and/or we'll get a PR claim that will confuse the shit out of everyone and the lynch will go to shit. It takes time for people to agree, and only scum benefit from the chaos. With the number of people not actually making substantive posts lately, this is likely to happen.

I want to lynch snoe or Lycan. I am fine with either one. I would prefer Lycan since snoe still hasn't been in the game very long and his flip wouldn't give many association tells, but I am still more than fine with snoe.

I'm baffled at why Lycan is not getting shitstormed by you guys. Can just one of you, even one of you just be like "hey IV, your case is full of shit and here's why: *makes intelligent case on why IV is full of shit and Lycan is not scum* ". If not, I don't see why you're not voting Lycan.

VOTE: Lycan
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
User avatar
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
Smooth Criminal
Smooth Criminal
Posts: 70566
Joined: February 24, 2013
Contact:

Post Post #322 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:51 am

Post by RadiantCowbells »

I don't particularly like your Lycan case.

I'm withholding my opinion on your Snoe case until I get something from Postie.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
User avatar
snoe
snoe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
snoe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 278
Joined: March 6, 2016

Post Post #323 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:53 am

Post by snoe »

In post 315, Simoyd wrote:"Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv"

^ Can someone explain this to me. I guess I'm missing the obvious but wouldn't scum be more motivated to defend themselves because they have more to lose from dying? Even in this game people have commented that forced or excessive defending is a scum tell. How is the opposite (not posting, so not defending) also a scum tell??
Simoyd, can you give context for the quote? I'm not sure who said it. I'm pretty sure it wasn't me, but it could've been.
(As to the point - I guess scum have more to lose and hence a greater incentive to defend themselves in this setup, but every townie KNOWS they're town and knows nothing else. It makes sense for them to defend themselves too. Did I miss your point?)
User avatar
innocentvillager
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
innocentvillager
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9430
Joined: March 12, 2012

Post Post #324 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:00 am

Post by innocentvillager »

In post 322, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't particularly like your Lycan case.
Great, thank you. I'd love to hear the reasoning.
In post 310, snoe wrote:260: Lycan continues on IV. I think Lycan is tunneling here, but it may be townish tunneling. Lycan says “Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv”, which is true but ignores that IV may be as busy as Lycan is.
snoe wrote:
In post 315, Simoyd wrote:"Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv"

^ Can someone explain this to me. I guess I'm missing the obvious but wouldn't scum be more motivated to defend themselves because they have more to lose from dying? Even in this game people have commented that forced or excessive defending is a scum tell. How is the opposite (not posting, so not defending) also a scum tell??
Simoyd, can you give context for the quote? I'm not sure who said it. I'm pretty sure it wasn't me, but it could've been.
(As to the point - I guess scum have more to lose and hence a greater incentive to defend themselves in this setup, but every townie KNOWS they're town and knows nothing else. It makes sense for them to defend themselves too. Did I miss your point?)
More scumpoints for lying and self-contradiction.
Locked