New York 195: Adventure Mafia - Game over!

zakk · Post Post #3125 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:21 am

In post 3122, Nahdia wrote:
In post 3120, Ircher wrote:I'll buy the claim.

Pedit: My, oh my....

Btw, if you guys are seriously only gonna lynch between Titus and me, you should 100% lynch me over Titus.

Pedit: .....
OK.

VOTE: Ircher

yeah i dont even know what this is

why don't you want to vote titus though?

Titus · Post Post #3126 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:22 am

In post 3119, zakk wrote:here's a pro-tip:

speculate why/whether each possible faction might do each action

come to conclusions

whether you act upon those conclusions is as important as knowing whether to speculate in the first place

you aren't even speculating

you are trolling those who are

ergo i'm ignoring you now.

I don't troll. Not in my genes.

Rampant speculation =/= scumhunting.

Lowell isn't an SK or anything else scum. You're flailing to make a theory rather than be caught with your hand in the cookie jar again.

Ircher · Post Post #3127 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:22 am

VOTE: Shaz

I've been feeling this midway D2 tbh, I just had more important concerns (Kop, Lowell)

Pedit: Still townread....

Titus · Post Post #3128 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:23 am

In post 3124, Shaziro wrote:I heard you. Problem is, that sounds like Titus is a scum PR and you want her to use her ability another time.

Another time? You crumbed pretty hard that you role blocked me night 1.

Nahdia · Post Post #3129 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:23 am

In post 3125, zakk wrote:
In post 3122, Nahdia wrote:
In post 3120, Ircher wrote:I'll buy the claim.

Pedit: My, oh my....

Btw, if you guys are seriously only gonna lynch between Titus and me, you should 100% lynch me over Titus.

Pedit: .....
OK.

VOTE: Ircher
yeah i dont even know what this is

why don't you want to vote titus though?

You said we should lynch you over Titus, so I'm lynching you over Titus.

zakk · Post Post #3130 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:24 am

Spoiler: hey nahdia what the fuck is this

Nahdia · Post Post #3131 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:25 am

I think I've been consistent?

Ircher · Post Post #3132 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:25 am

In post 2442, Shaziro wrote:
In post 2441, Titus wrote:
In post 2439, Shaziro wrote:No.
Why not?
Two reasons, the first of which is that I don't feel like you'd claim like that. The second is for ~reasons~ that would be bad for town to be outed atm.

This? @Titus

Shaziro · Post Post #3133 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:25 am

In post 3128, Titus wrote:
In post 3124, Shaziro wrote:I heard you. Problem is, that sounds like Titus is a scum PR and you want her to use her ability another time.
Another time? You crumbed pretty hard that you role blocked me night 1.

Uh...no I didn't? I haven't crumbed roleblocker at all, because I'm not one.

Titus · Post Post #3134 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:26 am

Nahdia, let's lynch Zakk and Shaz.

Nahdia · Post Post #3135 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:26 am

those are both awful reads.

i mean, i can maybe see shaz. but the zakk read is awful.

Ircher · Post Post #3136 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:26 am

@Shaz -- I quoted the relevent quote where you breadcrumbed.

Titus · Post Post #3137 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:27 am

In post 3132, Ircher wrote:
In post 2442, Shaziro wrote:
In post 2441, Titus wrote:
In post 2439, Shaziro wrote:No.
Why not?
Two reasons, the first of which is that I don't feel like you'd claim like that. The second is for ~reasons~ that would be bad for town to be outed atm.
This? @Titus

Yes and that conversation. You'll find me strongly suggesting to only jail me even nights.

Shaziro · Post Post #3138 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:27 am

In post 3131, Nahdia wrote:I think I've been consistent?

I believe his problem is that you went Ircher instead of Titus.

Titus · Post Post #3139 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:28 am

In post 3135, Nahdia wrote:those are both awful reads.

i mean, i can maybe see shaz. but the zakk read is awful.

What are good reads then?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #3140 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:29 am

vig titus]/b]
I've had enough of this, see you guys tomorrow.

Titus · Post Post #3141 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:29 am

In post 3140, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
vig titus]/b]
I've had enough of this, see you guys tomorrow.

Troll scum fail.

Nahdia · Post Post #3142 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:30 am

In post 3138, Shaziro wrote:
In post 3131, Nahdia wrote:I think I've been consistent?
I believe his problem is that you went Ircher instead of Titus.

well he can suck me.

In post 3139, Titus wrote:
In post 3135, Nahdia wrote:those are both awful reads.

i mean, i can maybe see shaz. but the zakk read is awful.
What are good reads then?

zakk being town is a good read.

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
vig titus]/b]
I've had enough of this, see you guys tomorrow.

lmao

Shaziro · Post Post #3143 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:30 am

Now you're rolefishing. No, I'm not a jailkeeper. I wasn't crumbing, those weren't my ~reasons~. Interesting that you assumed they were though. Gonna need a minute to figure that all out, preliminary thoughts are that if you're town, you were worried you'd be a target on nights that you couldn't do whatever thing you need to do, so you wanted the defense. If your role is odd night and important enough that you need to not be blocked, that would mean it'd be bad to make you claim. If you're scum, obviously you just wouldn't want to be blocked on nights when you can do your thing, whatever that may be.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #3144 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:31 am

In post 3140, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
vig titus

I've had enough of this, see you guys tomorrow.

FTFMS

mod feel free to count the quote

Ircher · Post Post #3145 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:32 am

In post 3143, Shaziro wrote:Now you're rolefishing. No, I'm not a jailkeeper. I wasn't crumbing, those weren't my ~reasons~. Interesting that you assumed they were though. Gonna need a minute to figure that all out, preliminary thoughts are that if you're town, you were worried you'd be a target on nights that you couldn't do whatever thing you need to do, so you wanted the defense. If your role is odd night and important enough that you need to not be blocked, that would mean it'd be bad to make you claim. If you're scum, obviously you just wouldn't want to be blocked on nights when you can do your thing, whatever that may be.

Thrn what ~Teasons~ are they or at least guve a specific, somewhat detailed reason why you cant say what those ~Reasons~ are?

Titus · Post Post #3146 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:33 am

Lols. You vig me and not the guy claiming vig.

Fake or scumclaim.

Moving onto getting the Shaz to confess.

What were your ~reasons~ if not that you had jailed me?

zakk · Post Post #3147 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:34 am

In post 3126, Titus wrote:Rampant speculation =/= scumhunting.

1. please tell me what this post is
2. please tell me what this post is
3. please tell me what this post is

In post 3126, Titus wrote:You're flailing to make a theory rather than be caught with your hand in the cookie jar again.

1. not flailing in the least
2. hand caught in the cookie jar? what cookie? what jar?
3. flailing??
4.

again??

In post 3126, Titus wrote:Lowell isn't an SK or anything else scum.

1. and you know this how?
2. and you know this

HOW??

textbook

titus.

idk if it's textbook titus

SCUM

, but it's textbook

titus

.

also, feels like scum. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ircher · Post Post #3148 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:34 am

In post 3146, Titus wrote:Lols. You vig me and not the guy claiming vig.

Fake or scumclaim.

Moving onto getting the Shaz to confess.

What were your ~reasons~ if not that you had jailed me?

Obviously fake; remember D1?

Shaziro · Post Post #3149 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:36 am

I did explahy I couldn't say my ~reasons~, that it would be bad for town. Now you're pushing for something bad for town, and rolefishing, and flailing. Christ alive.