New York 195: Adventure Mafia - Game over!

Ircher · Post Post #3150 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:39 am

In post 3149, Shaziro wrote:I did explahy I couldn't say my ~reasons~, that it would be bad for town. Now you're pushing for something bad for town, and rolefishing, and flailing. Christ alive.

What other ~reasons~ could be bad for town besides a possible pr role ability?

Be more specific.

Shaziro · Post Post #3151 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:39 am

EBWOP: Explain Why*

P-edit: You're -still- fishing after I called it out? Lol.

zakk · Post Post #3152 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:40 am

In post 3130, zakk wrote:
Spoiler: hey nahdia what the fuck is this
In post 3015, Nahdia wrote:looking back at Seth. i felt he was town, but now that i KNOW he was im curious about who was quick to jump on him when he did his weird shenanigans. scum will often be quick to jump on what they feel is a "justified" wagon. fiirst person i see is Ircher who i do recall having as a scumread so

VOTE: Ircher

In post 3017, zakk wrote:pedit nahdia no i want titus or lowell first please and thank you

In post 3082, Nahdia wrote:VOTE: Lowell
yeah.

In post 3086, zakk wrote:
In post 3083, Nahdia wrote:Titus basically just slam dunked Lowell
i certainly hope you mean me

i'm trying to slam dunk them both tbh

In post 3087, Nahdia wrote:
In post 3086, zakk wrote:
In post 3083, Nahdia wrote:Titus basically just slam dunked Lowell
i certainly hope you mean me

i'm trying to slam dunk them both tbh
i did.

In post 3103, Nahdia wrote:if no vig CC's Lowell, I'm gonna assume he's either real or they're planning on shooting Lowell tonight.

UNVOTE:

In post 3105, zakk wrote:
In post 3103, Nahdia wrote:if no vig CC's Lowell, I'm gonna assume he's either real or they're planning on shooting Lowell tonight.

UNVOTE:
which is why you should vote titus not lowell. if he's scum it'll work itself out.

In post 3122, Nahdia wrote:
In post 3120, Ircher wrote:I'll buy the claim.

Pedit: My, oh my....

Btw, if you guys are seriously only gonna lynch between Titus and me, you should 100% lynch me over Titus.

Pedit: .....
OK.

VOTE: Ircher

ಠ_ಠ

In post 3131, Nahdia wrote:I think I've been consistent?

idc if you're consistent, vote titus

Ircher · Post Post #3153 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:40 am

In post 3151, Shaziro wrote:EBWOP: Explain Why*

P-edit: You're -still- fishing after I called it out? Lol.

Go ahead & lynch me.

You'll be lynched next barring something crazy.

Titus · Post Post #3154 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:43 am

Calling people out on nonsense isn't role fishing Shaz.

Zakk, your posts haven't been scumhunting but doubt casting a vig. He sees 2-shot, thinks it matches. I say but roles are odd night (which I thought at the time). He had a mechanical based reason to suggest Kop was scum.

He's also claiming a death on scum. Lowell's town.

Lowell · Post Post #3155 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:43 am

Townpoints to shaz and shotty for being so very very wrong about me. It's bad that they're wrong, but good that they don't mind being wrong.

Scumpoints for titus for being obv right and trying to buddy. Everything she says about my claim goes without saying. Seems counterintuitive, I know, but in general I find those trying to stay on the good side of conftown are scum.

Also, @zakk, yes, basically I changed my mind on kop. At first I was focused on the 2-shot part and thinking "hey, yeah, that's def true," but then I thought about it and decided even if the claim is TRUE, it doesn't mean it's town. Especially given my killing role is also 2-shot. Also again I don't want to lie to you, having the opportunity to be the LOLHAMMER was a big draw. It may have clouded my judgment a little.

Ircher · Post Post #3156 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:45 am

In post 3155, Lowell wrote:Townpoints to shaz and shotty for being so very very wrong about me. It's bad that they're wrong, but good that they don't mind being wrong.

Scumpoints for titus for being obv right and trying to buddy. Everything she says about my claim goes without saying. Seems counterintuitive, I know, but in general I find those trying to stay on the good side of conftown are scum.

Also, @zakk, yes, basically I changed my mind on kop. At first I was focused on the 2-shot part and thinking "hey, yeah, that's def true," but then I thought about it and decided even if the claim is TRUE, it doesn't mean it's town. Especially given my killing role is also 2-shot. Also again I don't want to lie to you, having the opportunity to be the LOLHAMMER was a big draw. It may have clouded my judgment a little.

This is nonsensical, but looking at your win/loss history, it's probably NAI.

Titus · Post Post #3157 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:45 am

Lowell, Really? Dude. This is why I feel town suck. Shaz Shotty and Zakk get town points for trying to doubtcast obvtown and I get scumpoints for seeing that you're obvtown...and they call me the moonlogi queen.

Lowell · Post Post #3158 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:47 am

Yeah fine you could be town too, I guess. But I don't take back what I said about shaz and shotty. No way they get that active and agitated over a vig claim (esp a now moot one) if they're scum.

Ircher · Post Post #3159 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:48 am

Then who is scum, @Lowell?

Titus · Post Post #3160 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:50 am

Like has no one noticed Shaz walking back his roleblocker claim but me and Ircher immediately after Anen flips?

Oh yes scum get mad about obvown and discredit conftown. If you had bullets, maybe not. You've claimed to be out of bullets though.

Lowell · Post Post #3161 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:50 am

At any rate,

VOTE: magna

This was my second option last night, for more or less the same reasons as anen, only less so. I feel like there's some coasting happening here. Titus for sure could be scum, but to her credit at least she's tangling with the scumhunting ADHDers among us. I feel like magna's doing just enough to get by.

Ircher · Post Post #3162 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:52 am

Hrm....

What if the neighborhood doesn't have scum?

Titus · Post Post #3163 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:52 am

I want you to help me resolve this Shaz claim and walk back while we wait for Magna to return from VLA. I don't disagree with pressure there though...

Shaziro · Post Post #3164 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:53 am

You're assuming that you knew my reasons. You're assuming that you know what's going on in my mind. That's just dumb, to be honest.

Lowell · Post Post #3165 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:53 am

fos project matt

Thought about him as well. I'd also be interested to hear a lot more from nos and liger, the two I have the least read on and (by default) tend to lean scum.

Shaziro · Post Post #3166 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:54 am

I mean, seriously. "YOU CLAIMED THIS ROLE" "No, I didn't. That's not what I was suggesting at all, in fact, you're wrong" "BUT YOU CLAIMED THIS ROLE".

Ircher · Post Post #3167 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:54 am

But, if that were the case, then the neighborhood would prob. be a bit more active......

So, yeah, the neighborhood prob. does still have scum in it.

Pedit: If it's not PR-related, then what other reasobs could they be? Meta?

Ircher · Post Post #3168 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:56 am

In post 2442, Shaziro wrote:
In post 2441, Titus wrote:
In post 2439, Shaziro wrote:No.
Why not?
Two reasons, the first of which is that I don't feel like you'd claim like that. The second is for ~reasons~ that would be bad for town to be outed atm.

1) First reason is meta
2) Second reason highly suggests a roleblocking pr (esp. looking back at it)

Explain pls.

Shaziro · Post Post #3169 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:57 am

Christ alive, Ircher, I've made it very clear that it is bad for town for me to explain it. You're either scum who actively wants town to suffer, or just a VI who can't accept that he's wrong. Either way, I'm not explaining more than I already have, so stop fishing.

zakk · Post Post #3170 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:58 am

In post 3167, Ircher wrote:But, if that were the case, then the neighborhood would prob. be a bit more active......

how do you know how active the neighborhood is?

Ircher · Post Post #3171 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:58 am

In post 3169, Shaziro wrote:Christ alive, Ircher, I've made it very clear that it is bad for town for me to explain it. You're either scum who actively wants town to suffer, or just a VI who can't accept that he's wrong. Either way, I'm not explaining more than I already have, so stop fishing.

No, I'm not, cuz you're seriously backtracking.

Pedit: Thats what Magna said in his report

Ircher · Post Post #3172 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:59 am

In post 3064, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Summary of the Neighborhood QT -

Basically it was dead. Copper and I continued to snipe at each other. Liger showed up late, basically told us to keep it in the main thread and didn't really provide any thoughts himself which struck me as odd given his hard-on that my Night 1 activity was scummy when I was clearly V/LA. I still have reasons to lean that he's Town but I want to see what the Moiputer comes up with.

Ircher · Post Post #3173 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:00 am

In post 3169, Shaziro wrote:Christ alive, Ircher, I've made it very clear that it is bad for town for me to explain it. You're either scum who actively wants town to suffer, or just a VI who can't accept that he's wrong. Either way, I'm not explaining more than I already have, so stop fishing.

I'm not a VI; simply different.

Also, I'm 5-14 win-loss.

Shaziro · Post Post #3174 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:02 am

You've decided I was claiming a role. I've made it clear that no, that's not what I was doing. You're refusing to believe that for no other reason than what appears to be an inability to accept that your assumption was wrong. I'm done with this. Vote me if you want, hell, make an actual case and you can lynch me, but I'm not elaborating more. When I've made it clear that it'd be bad for town and you're still pushing it, I'm done trying.