Blank doesn't give major scumvibes necessarily, but definitely has not been towntelling. His reads aren't as scummy as much as they are bizarre.
I'm willing to lynch him based on the horribad scumminess of Pants/snoe.
In post 625, innocentvillager wrote:Honestly I think this circleshitting session between Postie Titus RC and Accountant can happen on d2. I'd much rather get Lycan/Blank today.
Blank doesn't give major scumvibes necessarily, but definitely has not been towntelling. His reads aren't as scummy as much as they are bizarre.
I'm willing to lynch him based on the horribad scumminess of Pants/snoe.
Intent to hammer
Okay I'm now happy to put Titus in my scumpool.
Postie, you were very recently all for lynching Blank. What happened?
Where was Postie in favor of lynching Blank?In post 630, innocentvillager wrote:Postie, you were very recently all for lynching Blank. What happened?
In post 391, Harkonnen97 wrote:In post 310, snoe wrote:2) I need to give you all SOMETHING with which to read my slot.Pants, bless him … didn’t.First you say that Pants was a null read. Now you are saying a different thing.In post 389, snoe wrote:Pants did 5 posts and they were lazy and prod-dodging.Scummy in a larger sense - they contributed nothing.
Sorry, I was actually just about to talk about that before you posted and then my computer froze on me so I lost my post.
Um, yes I can? What kind of strongarming appeal to authority attitude is that? Off your high horses please. Just because RC finally comes out with his SOLE well-reasoned post this entire game doesn't mean I HAVE to read it and respond to it before making a vote. I'm disappointed by this part of your post.You don't get to just skip over it and then state intent on another player.
These suggest it:In post 633, Titus wrote:Where was Postie in favor of lynching Blank?In post 630, innocentvillager wrote:Postie, you were very recently all for lynching Blank. What happened?
In post 418, Postie wrote:*shrug* As long as we lynch all of Accountant/Lycan/snoe at some point we should be good.
In post 427, Postie wrote:If we kill Accountant we can just kill snoe the day after though...
Looks like Postie obviously wants Accountant over BlankFace at least for today, but I don't see why she would get so upset if we lynched Blankface instead on d1. He's in her scumpool. IMO Postie overreacted.In post 443, Postie wrote:Yeah, I'm good with lynching BlankFace after Accountant. Those reads are awful.
Postie, where does this come from? You already knew at this point Titus is willing to lynch Blank right now, especially when she put Blank at L-1. So I'm not understanding why this quote suddenly makes Titus much more of a scumcandidate.
Sorry if I came across as harsh. It's just bad form to state intent on a player without addressing or even acknowledging the disagreements people have just brought up about your choice of lynch.In post 638, innocentvillager wrote:Sorry, I was actually just about to talk about that before you posted and then my computer froze on me so I lost my post.
Yeah, I read RC's case. Some of it I agree with, and the logic behind the case in general makes sense. A lot of it I don't know because most of it is still meta-shitting. Now, you and RC and maybe Titus can all speak to that since you've played with Accountant and stuff, fine. But you and RC can't expect to get others to just sheep you if RC's just assuming all these things about what town!Accountant would do or wouldn't do when there's no easy way to verify that.
That said, I'm leaning scum on Accountant, definitely more so after RC's case. But I like the snoe/Lycan scumteam a lot better, and I can reasonably entertain the possibility of a town!Accountant in this game. With snoe and Lycan I'm struggling to see them as anything but scum.
Um, yes I can? What kind of strongarming appeal to authority attitude is that? Off your high horses please. Just because RC finally comes out with his SOLE well-reasoned post this entire game doesn't mean I HAVE to read it and respond to it before making a vote. I'm disappointed by this part of your post.You don't get to just skip over it and then state intent on another player.
How about "IV, have you read RC's case? If not, read it. Otherwise, explain why you're not voting Accountant." Not too hard, right?
I probably overreacted. It looked like Titus was trying to push the lynch through as quickly as possible and that freaked me out.In post 640, innocentvillager wrote:Postie, where does this come from? You already knew at this point Titus is willing to lynch Blank right now, especially when she put Blank at L-1. So I'm not understanding why this quote suddenly makes Titus much more of a scumcandidate.
Ah okay, sorry I interpreted your comment differently lol. I get that.In post 644, Postie wrote:Sorry if I came across as harsh. It's just bad form to state intent on a player without addressing or even acknowledging the disagreements people have just brought up about your choice of lynch.
Stats on RC reading Accountant correctly/incorrectly?In post 644, Postie wrote:And the meta stuff is pretty credible given RC's track record when it comes to reading Accountant. That's not really something you can just ignore or heavily downplay because you haven't played with Accountant before yourself (I haven't either).