New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)

[Dunnstral]

So who's mafia, Zach?

[podoboq]

I don't know if I believe the mason claims. But I don't have to. I can't imagine lynching a claimed mason day one.
UNVOTE:

I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

This guy is town.

Pushing to lynch a claimed mason is a fool's errand,

and I don't think Agar is a fool. Looking forward to him getting some time to devote to this game.

I'm finding a contradiction here.

You say you won't lynch a claim on d1, then Agar said he would. Yet you called Agar town with the excuse that he isn't foolish. How does that make

any

sense?

Sorry, I misspoke. "If AGar is scum, lynching a claimed mason day one is a fool's errand." Think of it this way, if AGar is scum, he knows his team. He's either bussing, which also kill Dunn, or he knows Titus isn't town, and is just straight up pushing for a terrible mislynch, knowingly. That's bad scum play, and that's the fool's errand I'm talking about.

He's not a fool, so he can't be doing that as scum.

[Zachstralkita]

So who's mafia, Zach?

I'm down with nosferatu, implosion and maybe PeregrineV and shannon lynches. implosion explained the Titus stuff pretty well but I still don't like his AGar scumread post at all and that's enough for me.

[Performer]

Zach you remind me of Dr. Phil, as you have this...likability of getting inside our heads and understanding what we think before we even say it. Transcend is wearing a mask , and I 'm not trusting that.

Why are you down with Pere?? And I don't mean this sexually.
---
@podo I see. So it looks like Agar mistrusts Titus's claim. How come you voted Pere of all people? You could've voted Air , who hasn't posted at all.

Wow I sound like

I'm

a Mason with Pere now. But that 's just absurd.

[Zachstralkita]

Zach you remind me of Dr. Phil, as you have this...likability of getting inside our heads and understanding what we think before we even say it. Transcend is wearing a mask , and I 'm not trusting that.

Why are you down with Pere?? And I don't mean this sexually.
:

Oh fuck I'm gonna shoot myself if I in any way resemble that scumbag.


Well Peregrine's supposed to be posting more but he's not and I figure if you guys can lynch Sickofit for... IDK some weird Doodlebob logic shit then we can kill Peregrine.

Although I'm not familiar with Peregrine's play so he may not be the type to lurk as scum, so I'm more comfortable with killing Nos. Killing him dead.

[Performer]

Blah, never mind - Air posted twice and has been forgettable to me. His 50 was a big assumption, as he said " That being said, I do read that Performer is willing and ready to vote for someone. Just not now." This is a mighty assumption. What if I decide to actually no lynch?
VOTE: No Lynch

[Zachstralkita]

I don't like podo's " too scummy to be scum " theory on AGar, it basically states AGar's town and I believe that, that post is just off to me a little for some reason.

Blah, never mind - Air posted twice and has been forgettable to me. His 50 was a big assumption, as he said " That being said, I do read that Performer is willing and ready to vote for someone. Just not now." This is a mighty assumption. What if I decide to actually no lynch?
VOTE: No Lynch

[Titus]

I am fine with a Nos lynch, not my favorite but acceptable. Prefer Sick of it.

Dunn are you fine with a Nos lynch? Or implosion (my preferred choice).

@Performer, I see what you're doing. I love you too.

[Zachstralkita]

Dunn: " They're both town "

[Titus]

Blah, never mind - Air posted twice and has been forgettable to me. His 50 was a big assumption, as he said " That being said, I do read that Performer is willing and ready to vote for someone. Just not now." This is a mighty assumption. What if I decide to actually no lynch?
VOTE: No Lynch

Perf, can you stop this please?

[Wake1]

I would be willing to hammer Nosferatu.

[Zachstralkita]

I would be willing to hammer Nosferatu.

Let's Bob the Builder that motherfucker.

Or we can implode implosion.

[Wake1]

Zach, Performer, Titus, Dunnstral, Podoq.

Vote Nosferatu please.

[Titus]

OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.

[Zachstralkita]

OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.

and I'm the one being difficult..

[Zachstralkita]

It's okay! VOTE: implosion

[Performer]

@Zach OBJECTION !
---
@Wake I think those are good observations in your reads list on a few folks, and I can concur that Nos has been void of substance in his ISO, and for no good reason.

As for Sick, I found this post stood out in his ISO , and I 'd like to hear him tell us how his thought processes are working. So far I can't tell how he's arriving at his conclusions.

I'm not getting into the Zach v Titus. Not worth my time right now.

Right now: VOTE: Dunnstral.

Every time he posts I like him less and less.

Just dismisses a big piece of d1 and votes an entirely different person. Hmm.

[Dunnstral]

Dunn: " They're both town "

Nos might not be

Can we outline why Implosian is mafia like I'm 14 years old please

[Dunnstral]

Wake is town probably

[Dunnstral]

VOTE: Nosferatu

[Titus]

OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.

and I'm the one being difficult..

Yeah, Nos was compromising. Then Wake wanted it and I don't trust Wake at all.

You go first on Implosion, I'l supplement.

[Zachstralkita]

@Zach OBJECTION !
---
@Wake I think those are good observations in your reads list on a few folks, and I can concur that Nos has been void of substance in his ISO, and for no good reason.

As for Sick, I found this post stood out in his ISO , and I 'd like to hear him tell us how his thought processes are working. So far I can't tell how he's arriving at his conclusions.

I'm not getting into the Zach v Titus. Not worth my time right now.

Right now: VOTE: Dunnstral.

Every time he posts I like him less and less.

Just dismisses a big piece of d1 and votes an entirely different person. Hmm.

At that point in time Dunnstral wasn't exactly a bad vote from his perspective considering how much of a balloon animal Dunnstral was being.

Dunn: " They're both town "

Nos might not be

Can we outline why Implosian is mafia like I'm 14 years old please

When I get to my computer working tonight I'll case him

OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.

and I'm the one being difficult..

Yeah, Nos was compromising. Then Wake wanted it and I don't trust Wake at all.

You go first on Implosion, I'l supplement.

i did

[Performer]

Blah, never mind - Air posted twice and has been forgettable to me. His 50 was a big assumption, as he said " That being said, I do read that Performer is willing and ready to vote for someone. Just not now." This is a mighty assumption. What if I decide to actually no lynch?
VOTE: No Lynch

Perf, can you stop this please?

@Titus fine. VOTE: Transcend

Dunn: " They're both town "

Nos might not be

Can we outline why Implosian is mafia like I'm 14 years old please

This is a little shameful for me to admit but I don't understand why implosion is scum , either.

[Wake1]

OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.

Why?

It's okay! VOTE: implosion

I can concur that Nos has been void of substance in his ISO, and for no good reason.

Could you vote him?

[Zachstralkita]

Performer you're going to need to hire performers to perform at your funeral if you keep up with that Transc- oh I already explained it to you... whatever





I'M IN THE TRAP I'M PLAYING PS2 WITH A JUNKIE.. (PAIN IN MY LIFE!)