Mini 1805 [C'est fini!]

F-oh-ex · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:14 am

In post 294, Eggman wrote:
In post 288, F-oh-ex wrote:^This. He claiemed he actually closed the tab and his post did't send out.
No, I claimed I was rereading the game and pointing out things I missed before and closed that tab in the middle of writing it. You're deliberately misinterpreting that post.

In post 276, Eggman wrote:don't you just love when you're writing a big post then accidentally delete the tab
i'm rereading the game closely
also i only just understood dwlee's 167. VOTE: smithereens

1. You said you "accidentally delete the tab".
2. I refer that you "closed the tab" and didn't send .
3. You correct me that you "closed the tab" and you accuse me of deliberate misintepretation.

WHAT.

And if you mean that closing the tab referred to now and not to RQS "vanilla" post, then you still claimed that you had crumbed vanilla while you had never done so, as Dwlee99 pointed out.

Derek12 · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:14 am

In post 254, crazycrabman wrote: Yeah, I'm reluctant to scum read Smithereen on two posts that he made. Two posts is not enough to judge anyone on.

He's posted more since then, what are your thoughts on the posts?

In post 292, crazycrabman wrote:I think that the "what's your favorite desert question" was definitely on purpose. I don't know what way that points eggman, though.

Ok so, do you have any thoughts on Eggman beyond this? Or any player not named Creature? Your recent posts still have little to no real content.

----

As for the VT crumb I don't really see crumbing VT as alignment indicative. It seems kinda pointless as both town and scum, and I could see him doing it as either alignment. I still think crazy is a better wagon, which is why people should join me on it.

F-oh-ex · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:15 am

@Derek ISO is still happening, I'll post it soon. I particularly don't like his late interactions with Eggman.

Eggman · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:16 am

Because I meant to vote Smithereens pages ago to see what he would do about it and for (an admittedly small amount of) pressure, but the format was incorrect so it never actually went in.
PEDIT: you said the tab I closed was for me, saying my favorite desert was vanilla ice cream for the RQS. I said, the tab I closed was my catching-up post.

Derek12 · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:17 am

In post 300, F-oh-ex wrote:
In post 294, Eggman wrote:
In post 288, F-oh-ex wrote:^This. He claiemed he actually closed the tab and his post did't send out.
No, I claimed I was rereading the game and pointing out things I missed before and closed that tab in the middle of writing it. You're deliberately misinterpreting that post.

In post 276, Eggman wrote:don't you just love when you're writing a big post then accidentally delete the tab
i'm rereading the game closely
also i only just understood dwlee's 167. VOTE: smithereens
1. You said you "accidentally delete the tab".
2. I refer that you "closed the tab" and didn't send .
3. You correct me that you "closed the tab" and you accuse me of deliberate misintepretation.

WHAT.

Yeah, I'm not going to lie this entire quote makes very little sense. Could you uhh, try to explain it again.

Derek12 · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:18 am

I don't really know what you're getting at there.

Eggman · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:21 am

Derek: After I wrote the post saying I was rereading and I closed the tab where I had written a post on what I had missed before, F-oh-ex said the tab was where I was going to crumb VT. It wasn't, so I accused him of misinterpreting my post.
Speaking of which, my favorite desert is vanilla ice cream.

F-oh-ex · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:21 am

In post 303, Eggman wrote: PEDIT: you said the tab I closed was for me, saying my favorite desert was vanilla ice cream for the RQS. I said, the tab I closed was my catching-up post.

Okay so:
1. You claimed that you had said your favourite dessert was vanilla ice cream for the RQS.
2. Dwlee99 pointed out you've never done so.
3. You made a post about accidentally closing your tab mid-writing.
It's only logical I thought it referred to "vanilla" post since that's the one you claimed to have sent but didn't, isn't it?
4. You accuse me of deliberate misintepretation. Mwhah, kay.

Now that you've cleared up it wasn't about "vanilla" post, I'll restate what Dwlee99 said since you never answered this.
Why did you claim to have crumbed VT with "vanilla ice cream" RQS if you have NEVER MADE STATED POST?

F-oh-ex · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:22 am

The first post where you posted something related to "vanilla ice cream" was 272, the one where you claimed VT.

F-oh-ex · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:22 am

In post 274, Dwlee99 wrote:You never even said what your favorite one was, this doesnt make sense lol

That @Eggman

F-oh-ex · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:23 am

In post 306, Eggman wrote:Derek: After I wrote the post saying I was rereading and I closed the tab where I had written a post on what I had missed before, F-oh-ex said the tab was where I was going to crumb VT. It wasn't, so I accused him of misinterpreting my post.
Speaking of which, my favorite desert is vanilla ice cream.

It seems I did misinterpret it but I explained why it was only logical to think why you meant that "vanilla" post. And let's not forget you clearly said DELIBERATE misinterpretation.

Eggman · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:24 am

I was going to, 'till the wagon started and I got to L-1. Also, see 306. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
310: where..?

F-oh-ex · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:26 am

In post 272, Eggman wrote: PEDIT: VT. It's why I did the RQS: "vanilla" ice cream

In post 311, Eggman wrote:I was going to, 'till the wagon started and I got to L-1.

So you claimed to have crumbed VT. Now you say you "were going to" crumb it but never got to?

Where what? Where did I explain or where did you say it was deliberate of me? Just so that there are no more "misunderstandings", please be more precise.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:38 am

clown

fiesta

Eggman · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:10 am

OK, now even I'm confused by this whole ordeal, which may or may not has been your intention.
I put the question so I could follow it up with "mine is vanilla ice cream", but you guys started a wagon on me while I was away and I had to claim before answering it.
I think Dwlee got it right.

Derek12 · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:13 am

Are you still making that catch up post

Robbnva · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:16 am

In post 314, Eggman wrote:OK, now even I'm confused by this whole ordeal, which may or may not has been your intention.
I put the question so I could follow it up with "mine is vanilla ice cream", but you guys started a wagon on me while I was away and I had to claim before answering it.
I think Dwlee got it right.

You made multiple posts before a wagon formed on you though. I also don't understand why you wouldn't ask the question and give your own answer first.

I still don't understand why a vt would need to crumb vt to begin with.

Robbnva · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:18 am

In post 160, Dwlee99 wrote:Which sounds easier: Pushing a (presumably) strong player for not liking early town reads, or agreeing with the strong player in not liking early town reads in order to push a lynch through?

That's assuming I'm a presumably strong player. Imo it would have been easier for scum to attack me instead of defend me

F-oh-ex · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:19 am

Basically what Robbnva said, Eggman's claim was his post #8 so he had plenty of chances to crumb if that was his intention.

Robbnva · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:20 am

In post 165, Eggman wrote:Dwlee and Robbnva's banter, to me, implies some sort of familiarity between the two

What makes you think that?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:20 am

In post 317, Robbnva wrote:
In post 160, Dwlee99 wrote:Which sounds easier: Pushing a (presumably) strong player for not liking early town reads, or agreeing with the strong player in not liking early town reads in order to push a lynch through?
That's assuming I'm a presumably strong player. Imo it would have been easier for scum to attack me instead of defend me

In post 69, Robbnva wrote:
In post 66, Dwlee99 wrote:How many games exactly do you have across all of your alts, robbnva?
About 135 give or take a couple.

Robbnva · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:26 am

But smitherines made the vote on creature before I said how many games I've played

Smithereens · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:27 am

people have been referring me to Robbnva or something he did and haven't explained what they are talking about actually.

Smithereens · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:27 am

In post 277, Creature wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4

Let's go here, his play here is WAY different than his town play I know.

Suddenly switches wagons from a perfectly valid one based on a contrived excuse.

Smithereens · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:31 am

In post 282, Creature wrote:I've been ISOing everybody and:
- Eggman has crumbed VT, which I find very unlikely he'd do that as scum.
- There are 6 players scum reading him excluding me.

So I am no longer scumreading Eggman.

This is utter scum. No you didn't ISO everyone that's pretty obvious, you're simply trying to make a reason to not scum read Eggman. Furthermore there are 6 players scum reading him means that clearly a lot of townies are scum reading him, why the fuck is that a reason to cancel your scum read??

Answer is it isn't. You don't have any reason to stop scum reading him since we both know your first reason is clearly BS. The second reason however is the one which stinks the most.

Imo Creature is likely scum with Eggman. Let's flip Eggman for a better idea.