New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1650 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:42 pm

From one mislynch to another. You guys are fucking great.

I will now take my leave.

Transcend · Post Post #1651 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:43 pm

Pretty sure implosion is mafia and nos was right about him

podoboq · Post Post #1652 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:43 pm

In post 1647, Titus wrote:
In post 1638, podoboq wrote:
In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.
Really? Scum shooting one mason and confirming the other is wifom? Like shit.

That's not analyzing WHY they killed who they killed, which is what I read when you said "tell US what they fear."

Dunnstral · Post Post #1653 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:43 pm

Can you case implosion when you get home

ISO · Post Post #1654 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:43 pm

Like this whole game is just fucking full of arrogance and it's the biggest thing that's pissing me off. Everyone thinks their reads are better than everyone else's and no one is willing to compromise on anything because of that.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1655 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:43 pm

Hey guys.........................

If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me

Titus · Post Post #1656 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:44 pm

In post 1650, Zachstralkita wrote:From one mislynch to another. You guys are fucking great.

I will now take my leave.

You could try meeting me half way and talk about lynching people I am willing to lynch.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1657 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:44 pm

I am fully willing to compromise.

JUST NOT ON ME OR TITUS

Wake1 · Post Post #1658 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:44 pm

In post 1631, Zachstralkita wrote:LMFAO he thinks I'm actually mafia ^

Do not presume you're cleared.

Titus · Post Post #1659 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:44 pm

In post 1654, implosion wrote:Like this whole game is just fucking full of arrogance and it's the biggest thing that's pissing me off. Everyone thinks their reads are better than everyone else's and no one is willing to compromise on anything because of that.

You're about displaying what I am feeling 50 pages ago.

Transcend · Post Post #1660 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:45 pm

In post 1653, Dunnstral wrote:Can you case implosion when you get home

Maybe.

podoboq · Post Post #1661 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:45 pm

In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................

If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me

I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1662 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:45 pm

In post 1661, podoboq wrote:
In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................

If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.

No

Dunnstral · Post Post #1663 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:45 pm

In post 1660, Transcend wrote:
In post 1653, Dunnstral wrote:Can you case implosion when you get home
Maybe.

No maybe I'm genuinely curious on this one

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1664 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:45 pm

Transcend wrote:Pretty sure implosion is mafia and nos was right about him

If you vote implosion I will be your puppet

Wake88 wrote:
In post 1631, Zachstralkita wrote:LMFAO he thinks I'm actually mafia ^
Do not presume you're cleared.

I can presume what the fuck I want bro

Anyways, I'm not speaking further until certain variables align themselves in the right way for me.

podoboq · Post Post #1665 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:46 pm

In post 1662, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1661, podoboq wrote:
In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................

If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.
No

In post 1657, Dunnstral wrote:I am fully willing to compromise.

JUST NOT ON ME OR TITUS

On what do you intend to compromise, then?
I will literally vote any of the four of you.

Titus · Post Post #1666 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:46 pm

In post 1661, podoboq wrote:
In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................

If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.

No. We aren't doing petty vindictive shit. If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.

Transcend · Post Post #1667 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:47 pm

It's mostly his posts give me a bad gut feeling. I'll try my best to explain my thoughts on him when i get home.

Wake1 · Post Post #1668 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:47 pm

In post 1637, Dunnstral wrote:The lurker is sickofit

I think

You should know there are multiple lurkers here.

ISO · Post Post #1669 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:47 pm

In post 1659, Titus wrote:
In post 1654, implosion wrote:Like this whole game is just fucking full of arrogance and it's the biggest thing that's pissing me off. Everyone thinks their reads are better than everyone else's and no one is willing to compromise on anything because of that.
You're about displaying what I am feeling 50 pages ago.

You're somewhat guilty of this too. But you're trying to compromise so I can't really complain.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1670 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:47 pm

You saying "vote x" isn't compromise

Zach isn't claiming mason so get that out of your head, we don't need to lynch in us 4.

Titus · Post Post #1671 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1668, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1637, Dunnstral wrote:The lurker is sickofit

I think
You should know there are multiple lurkers here.

Context, lurker scum.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1672 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1664, Zachstralkita wrote:If you vote implosion I will be your puppet

Can you case Implosion?

podoboq · Post Post #1673 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.

Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1674 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1668, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1637, Dunnstral wrote:The lurker is sickofit

I think
You should know there are multiple lurkers here.

I meant the lurker that was being talked about