Creature is not actively scum hunting.In post 795, Infinity 324 wrote:Creature is actively scum hunting and thereby playing to the town wincon.
Did you know scum scum-hunt as scum? Does that make them play to the town wincon?
I think not.
Creature is not actively scum hunting.In post 795, Infinity 324 wrote:Creature is actively scum hunting and thereby playing to the town wincon.
Are you?In post 800, Smithereens wrote:Creature is not actively scum hunting.
In post 711, Smithereens wrote:Reason. A player who is uninformed is likely to stick to a person who they've discovered is scum with a high degree of confidence. Moving off it simply shows how little profundity the discovery actually made on the player. If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.In post 709, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you have a reason you think it's more likely to come from scum or is it just experience
In post 760, Smithereens wrote:@Rob, I'm worried about your vote Rob because your vote stands out for being incongruent with arguments that you levied at Creature to accuse him of being scum. The other players don't stand out at all in terms of their votes. Also, be patient with your requests for replies. As you can see you're not the only one.
@Infinity, don't get tied up over the fact that I am or aren't faking my annoyance, I might end up getting annoyed. Lurking from experience does not actually happen despite how many people think it does.
@Dragon, Incorrect. The point is that a townie doesn't play in that fashion, because it involves a detachment of concern from finding scum. Yes, theoretically it is good play. Town don't do this 'good play,' because it actually doesn't reflect a straight forward pursuit of the town win con. It's more how an emotionless robot would play the game, or a scum with no interest in helping the town. Also, this is what I meant by saying you need to be watched. You're a spectator who is throwing opinions at material other people are saying and not attempting to contribute yourself. We don't need a commentator in a mafia game.
this is your weird obsession with win conIn post 794, Smithereens wrote:Do you suggest that Creature is a newb who doesn't know what the town win con looks like..?
What Creature is actually doing can only be explained by newb town if he is town. Scum hunting not randomly fitting scum interpretations to behaviours you see in the Day chat. Creature is doing this ergo I know he isn't scum hunting.In post 802, Infinity 324 wrote:Creature was actively scum hunting for most of the game. Creature looks town for that, scum hunting is kinda hard to fake as noob scum. In addition, he's looks very open with his thoughts which is hard to fake even for experienced scum.
You were told that you were factually incorrect about the reason for backflipping. You didn't refute those reasons either, and now it seems we're back there again.In post 806, Creature wrote:I flipped on the Eggman wagon because I felt the reason I've given was very coherent.
Semantics imo. The fact that you bring it up at all bothers meIn post 799, Smithereens wrote:If you read my post vs you, I posited you had apathy for the town wincon.In post 797, Robbnva wrote:That's like 2 peopl you have accused of not playing against their win con which is 2 more than it should be.In post 794, Smithereens wrote:Do you suggest that Creature is a newb who doesn't know what the town win con looks like..?
In this situation I'm not suggesting Creature is against the town wincon.
I have accused 0 players of going against a wincon.
If you lack understanding in this matter, the post your taking issue with basically asks whether or not creature is just lolvoting because he has no idea how to read. It's also a legit question.
It doesn't break the fact Eggman's crumb seemed to come from town.In post 808, Smithereens wrote:You were told that you were factually incorrect about the reason for backflipping. You didn't refute those reasons either, and now it seems we're back there again.In post 806, Creature wrote:I flipped on the Eggman wagon because I felt the reason I've given was very coherent.
Then literally anything can be easily faked.In post 810, Smithereens wrote:Yes. Scum hunting is easily faked. You'd know because you're voting me.
Going to disagree here. I don't really see anything that looked good coming from him after he got called out for his weird 180 which implies buckling under pressure which implies scumIn post 802, Infinity 324 wrote:Creature was actively scum hunting for most of the game. Creature looks town for that, scum hunting is kinda hard to fake as noob scum. In addition, he's looks very open with his thoughts which is hard to fake even for experienced scum.
Eggman's crumb is not AI. If it is AI, then it's scum AI. Townies don't crumb VT.In post 812, Creature wrote:It doesn't break the fact Eggman's crumb seemed to come from town.In post 808, Smithereens wrote:You were told that you were factually incorrect about the reason for backflipping. You didn't refute those reasons either, and now it seems we're back there again.In post 806, Creature wrote:I flipped on the Eggman wagon because I felt the reason I've given was very coherent.
Gj it seems you do learn.In post 813, Creature wrote:Then literally anything can be easily faked.In post 810, Smithereens wrote:Yes. Scum hunting is easily faked. You'd know because you're voting me.
...how about my question?In post 811, Robbnva wrote: Semantics imo. The fact that you bring it up at all bothers me
Your initial premise is flawed: I never gave any credit to your 'reads' to begin with. This explanation concerns itself with how you might be town, not why your reads are wrong.In post 816, Creature wrote:Doesn't it sound weird Smithereens pointed out the possibility I am just a newb to discredit any reads I've had this game?
Do you suggest that Creature is a newb who doesn't know what the town win con looks like..?In post 818, Robbnva wrote:What question?