Mini 1805 [C'est fini!]

Robbnva · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:22 am

No comment

Dwlee99 · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:24 am

oh Im stupid lol

Dwlee99 · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:27 am

846
Is NAI imo

Robbnva · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:37 am

In post 852, Dwlee99 wrote:846
Is NAI imo

Bulllshit

Creature · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:38 am

In post 846, petroleumjelly wrote:Post #542: Robbnva has questioned "at least ha[lf] the player list" (running theme of pointing out his own accomplishments in-game)

Wouldn't that be a towntell?

Post #545: Robbnva explains doubts on Eggman lynch (fair post+)

Reconsidering Eggman is actually a good sign.

3.)
Dragon of the West seems to have transformed starting around Post #632. Prior to that he seemed to jump in to make inane comments, or comments seemingly designed to keep the day going in the direction it was already going (i.e., an Eggman or Creature lynch). I was ready to call him out for textbook active lurking. Now he has "softened" his read after the wagon has substantially ebbed.

Forgot to mention that my DotW townread is long gone. I know it's usual him focusing on his scumreads, but doubtcasting reads?

In post 847, Robbnva wrote:1. You're like the second person to have issues with the "I'm not scum but" thing. Why? If you are accused of being scum and you aren't the natural reaction is to deny that you are scum.

What bothers more is the "in my watch list", looks like pocketing/dismissing.

3. Not sure why you have an issue with 154. That was a genuine post

7. it is ridiculous that he's scum reading a vacant slot and from his post there is NO WAY you or anyone else can determine he's using Poe. You are letting your bias show with this one.

Why not? I said I highly believe scum is in that list, not that I was scumreading all of them.

11. More nitpicky stuff. Like there is seriously nothing wrong with requesting a scummy player being investigated or me voting a person I'm scum reading.

By saying who should be investigated, you're saying who scum should NK.

Robbnva · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:42 am

In post 854, Creature wrote:By saying who should be investigated, you're saying who scum should NK.

Ok stretch Armstrong

Robbnva · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:44 am

In post 854, Creature wrote:Why not? I said I highly believe scum is in that list, not that I was scumreading all of them.

I already covered this. When a person has only posted 1 post or no post at all you can't make an informed decision about their alignment.

Putting them in your list just for the sake of having a list is poor play. They have to remain in the null category until they have provided content you can analyze.

That's just basic common sense, not to mention good play.

Smithereens · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:56 am

Creature is obviously correct Rob.

He removed his town reads from the player list and then said that the scum must be in the players left. What are you trying to do?

Creature · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:56 am

In post 856, Robbnva wrote:Putting them in your list just for the sake of having a list is poor play. They have to remain in the null category until they have provided content you can analyze.

The purpose of my list was to narrow down scum (or try to), I can't put nullreads out of my list when they've done nothing that pings town.

Robbnva · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:06 am

In post 857, Smithereens wrote:Creature is obviously correct Rob.

He removed his town reads from the player list and then said that the scum must be in the players left. What are you trying to do?

I'm not trying to do anything. i don't actually believe he actually has that many town reads, especially so early day 1 and I think it's ridiculous to include a completely inactive slot as a scum read.

Robbnva · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:07 am

Damn it. Forgot I'm ignoring you please stop talking to me

Infinity 324 · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:49 am

Damn I don't like to give town reads based on catchup posts but that was a really good one...

I have a lot of town reads too, Robb, and what creature did made a lot of sense to me.

I think players have wildly different playstyle and that's kinda screwing with us. "I don't see how you can possibly be scum reading me as town" is not an argument, I think all of us should make an effort to understand people's thought processes more.

Creature · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:52 am

I liked his catch up, but I agree that some of the points he raised against Robbnva look nitpicky.

Creature · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:54 am

- Derek12, Dwlee99, Infinity 324
- atm487, Eggman
- F-oh-ex, petroleumjelly
- Dragon of the West, Robbnva
- crazycrabman, MarioManiac4, Smithereens

Infinity 324 · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:04 am

I agree that petroleum's catchup was nitpicky in the respect.

Don't see why smithereens is scum, his aggressiveness reads town to me (you mentioned a discredit a couple times, but that doesn't really convince me)

Also do you think crabman would make up that thing about changing to a new playstyle? I could see him as noob scum, but can't get over that and his open frustration about trying to look town.

Why is derek so high up?

Robbnva · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:10 am

In post 861, Infinity 324 wrote:Damn I don't like to give town reads based on catchup posts but that was a really good one...

Ok guys. Seriously where is Ashton Kutcher at?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:27 am

It is NAI because petroleum could have made that post before replacing in

Robbnva · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:30 am

But it's scummy so it can be Ai

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:57 am

In post 622, Robbnva wrote:
In post 620, MarioManiac4 wrote:I want more from Dwlee on his crab case because I'm really not seeing it.
I'm definitely going to be more active this weekend, but I should be here more tonight too.
I think it's safe to say we all want more from you. Pretty ballsy to ask others for more info when you haven't done much.

Not really. I haven't posted much mostly because I don't have many reads from this scenario. He established a read and is bandwagoning it but isn't really offering an explanation.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:57 am

In post 622, Robbnva wrote:
In post 620, MarioManiac4 wrote:I want more from Dwlee on his crab case because I'm really not seeing it.
I'm definitely going to be more active this weekend, but I should be here more tonight too.
I think it's safe to say we all want more from you. Pretty ballsy to ask others for more info when you haven't done much.

Not really. I haven't posted much mostly because I don't have many reads from this scenario. He established a read and is bandwagoning it but isn't really offering an explanation.

Robbnva · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:59 am

You aren't even trying to establish reads. Right now your play is p.much textbook active lurking

Dragon of the West · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:09 am

In post 846, petroleumjelly wrote:Very tired, and I have not read the game as closely as I would like. My take-aways:

3.)
Dragon of the West seems to have transformed starting around Post #632. Prior to that he seemed to jump in to make inane comments, or comments seemingly designed to keep the day going in the direction it was already going (i.e., an Eggman or Creature lynch). I was ready to call him out for textbook active lurking. Now he has "softened" his read after the wagon has substantially ebbed.

Dragon of the West, do you feel like your play has kicked into gear lately. Why?

Yes for 2 reasons. 1) This only my second game ever so I'm still kinda figuring it out and even within this game stuff has started clicking more for me. And 2) I had a couple days off work in a row so I could literally be more active

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:11 am

In post 661, Dragon of the West wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4 I want to hear more from him and I really feel like the only way to do that is to start putting some votes on him. I'm on board with both the creature and crazy wagons though as they're still my main scumreads. I don't think they could both be part of the same scum team though. I'll go through their interactions in a bit to see if I'm wrong, but just from memory it seems like they've both taken decent cracks at each other

Interesting... why did you think this is true?

Infinity 324 · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:12 am

In post 866, Dwlee99 wrote:It is NAI because petroleum could have made that post before replacing in

That's true, I didn't think of that.

In post 869, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 622, Robbnva wrote:
In post 620, MarioManiac4 wrote:I want more from Dwlee on his crab case because I'm really not seeing it.
I'm definitely going to be more active this weekend, but I should be here more tonight too.
I think it's safe to say we all want more from you. Pretty ballsy to ask others for more info when you haven't done much.
Not really. I haven't posted much mostly because I don't have many reads from this scenario. He established a read and is bandwagoning it but isn't really offering an explanation.

Come on dude, at least read the thread and try to scumhunt.

In post 871, Dragon of the West wrote:This only my second game ever

Really? You seem to know a lot of mafia theory for only your second game!

Dragon of the West · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:18 am

In post 872, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 661, Dragon of the West wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4 I want to hear more from him and I really feel like the only way to do that is to start putting some votes on him. I'm on board with both the creature and crazy wagons though as they're still my main scumreads. I don't think they could both be part of the same scum team though. I'll go through their interactions in a bit to see if I'm wrong, but just from memory it seems like they've both taken decent cracks at each other
Interesting... why did you think this is true?

Which part of it? Getting you to give more or thinking they can't be on a scum team together?