Actually, no I don't. You've been prodded to talk throughout the D2. You found time to talk, and away you went. There's nothing wrong with that. But it doesn't cover the fact that in my opinion, you posting at that time did distract the Performer wagon.In post 3766, Mirhawk wrote:Do you think I did this intentionally?In post 3743, Airick10 wrote:I think the magical emergence of Mirhawk saved any momentum to lynch Performer/Kraska. Attention was drawn off.
Any alignment? Really? I believe a pro-town role would do that much more likely then scum. Keep in mind, scum has already lost one player. They don't want to lose two. If you were scum in that situation, you'd tell the town who has you at L1 to get bent? Personally, I think a pro-town person would do that much more then scum would.In post 3761, Mirhawk wrote: If I had subbed into a game where I was being asked to claim and there were 11 days left I would tell people to get bent until I figured out what was going on too. Any alignment, that is absolutely what I would do.
I'm undecided on Kraska. I'm maybe scumreading her a bit now that she's talked a bit, but that might be because I'm annoyed by the fact that she's targeting me to pull heat off herself. On the other hand I could understand this coming from a townie, she subbed into the game and she was under heavy fire so the first thing she did was attack the person who made the most effective case on her and jump on the nearest counterwagon. It's survivalistic as fuck, but I get why she would do it.
Dunn has no reason to suddenly townread Kraska, nobody else seemed to be interested in pointing that out. Dunns done a lot of shady shit this game, but despite that a fairly vocal portion of the town think that he's town. I figure if I keep calling him on shit sooner or later they'll get it.
I do agree with your statement on Kraska as you do seem like an easy target to get some heat thrown off her. She gave some okay reasons, but I still don't quite buy why she's voting you and not Agar at this point.