You don't seem very confident.In post 149, Lycanfire wrote:Bastion if you like confidence you should vote light_ganski with me.
Asking Light to join your wagon and doubting your ability to lynch?
You don't seem very confident.In post 149, Lycanfire wrote:Bastion if you like confidence you should vote light_ganski with me.
there's nothing confident about your posts.In post 149, Lycanfire wrote:Bastion if you like confidence you should vote light_ganski with me.
The time has come!In post 141, superbowl9 wrote:Was going to write a long post but flying back home today so that'll probly come tomorrow. Just gonna write some quick thoughts/early reads here tho:
I find kyndy's case to be a stretch/pretty bad but i agree with a couple points. Was very slightly scumreading vedith before her post tho which hasnt changed.
I do not like NJAC's play so far and he is my prime lynch target rn. I would vote him but since i cant really elaborate on anything I'll save it for tmrw.
@bastion why do you think vedith's confidence is a good thing?
Slight townread on sora and bastion.
I think thats it but anything i missed will be at the start of my long post.
Bye California!
What exactly was shadow onto? Sora literally has one rvs post before this. That's like me saying I'm onto something with Raskolnikov rn. Regardless of your alignment, blindly sheeping the IC then claiming there's some kind of substance behind it when there clearly isn't is anti-town.In post 72, NJAC wrote:Not much to elaborate actually. Sort of a RVS vote. Sort of a pressure vote. Sort of maybe shadow could be onto something.In post 65, superbowl9 wrote:Can you elaborate on "nice place for my vote to be"?
In post 153, Vedith wrote:@Mod - Have the hydra player accounts (not the hydra itself) been messaged? It's odd for those players to not have posted yet.
Yep. I agree with this^. I was going to comment something on these lines about that. In fact, fencesitting and just playing as spectator is more scummy than interjecting into an interaction between players. But I recognize there are some instances in which is better to not interfere.In post 154, superbowl9 wrote:I mostly agree with Bastion but I want to say that interjecting yourself into an interaction is not always bad. It's also generally true (at least afaik) that keeping information to yourself (besides pr identities and other obvious exceptions) is bad for town, because the more accurate information we have the better. If you have an idea that nobody else has considered you should put it out there. Ofc I also agree that letting interactions happen naturally is also critical, cause you can get reactions/info and all, but I think you need to have a balance between those two sides of it.
Well, I obviously thought it was too soon for shadow to be pushing Sora, but I thought he maybe (I specifically said "maybe" because I was not sure) might be onto something given that he addressed a question to Sora after his first RVS post, and given that shadow said he wanted to vote Sora. Look:What exactly was shadow onto? Sora literally has one rvs post before this. That's like me saying I'm onto something with Raskolnikov rn. Regardless of your alignment, blindly sheeping the IC then claiming there's some kind of substance behind it when there clearly isn't is anti-town.
In post 19, shaddowez wrote:Sora - What sort of intentions do you have during RVS?
So, maybe shadow was getting a gut read or something, maybe based on meta or w/e. Not necessarily having a read from just one single RVS post.In post 47, shaddowez wrote:I sort of want to vote Sora right now, but want to wait to hear more from them first.
If you want me to give more detail or elaborate on something just ask. As I said in 119, I was reading Kindy leaning town, but I didn't want to add details because she was being pushed and I wanted to see her defense instead of defend her myself. WRT the naked vote on Sora in 51 I didn't feel the need to add details, but I gave them later on request.Combine this with the general lack of detail in his posts (51, 119) and it gives me the feeling that he's flying under the radar despite having the second highest post count. Someone who's that impressionable and makes empty statements (119 is again a prime example) is not someone I want to have around as town.
Yep, I was going to give my reads after commenting on some recent posts. A bit of patience please.In post 161, SoraAdvent wrote:@NJAC: Can you please give reads of some sort? I'd love to see who you consider to be the prime suspect now, if you don't mind.
Obviously shadow is not "leaning town" but town, just to be clear.In post 163, NJAC wrote:Leaning town: Bastian, Vedith, shadow
This portion bolded here may help you to understand why I made the argument I did when I did. To address your other point, just because I shifted my vote from Kyndy to Vedith you assume I'm bandwagoning and trying to gain favor, when you're forgetting the other thing that happened during that time - kyndy's post. I explained just now that I don't like some of the reasoning in her post, but I think she's more of a townread now, then voted Vedith because his posts have looked increasingly worse. Whether you accept my reasoning is up to you at this point, but from my point of view you're jumping to conclusions awfully quickly.In post 114, SoraAdvent wrote:Kyndy101 - I actually both agree and disagree with Sir Bastion that the random RVS unvote is somewhat suspicious.The unvote itself shows a little bit of passivity that I think is a bit more mafia-ish than town-ish, a little reticence and hesitation. However, I can also understand that the vote itself was made a little quickly to begin with, as the fact that superbowl was a goon did slip my mind as well - while I definitely don’t agree with the reasoning of retracting an RVS vote based on chance, it’s understandable.
I actually haven't done anything. What's townier about them?In post 167, kyndy101 wrote:Vedith: See previous post on Vedith, however recent posts seem townier- possibly just do to increased effort to appear towny.
Fixed.In post 166, SoraAdvent wrote:I had to label you as scum for effect of scum hunting, I can't explain why, so lets hope that the flip and night kill makes us forget about this comment tomorrow
142 and 148 are what I was looking at. They seem to be aimed more for town's benefit.In post 168, Vedith wrote:I actually haven't done anything. What's townier about them?In post 167, kyndy101 wrote:Vedith: See previous post on Vedith, however recent posts seem townier- possibly just do to increased effort to appear towny.
Asking the mod to prod at people to join the game?
Okay, 142 could be seen as town (We did it, Reddit!), but explain 148.In post 170, kyndy101 wrote:142 and 148 are what I was looking at. They seem to be aimed more for town's benefit.
Sure, because blatantly defending a scumpartner is such a great strategy for scum .In post 166, SoraAdvent wrote:At this point I might call a NJAC/Vedith scumteam as an initial accusation
Except that you didn't.I've explained one of your scummy actions in that post as well.
I'll patiently wait for your reasoning.Reads can change, you know, and I'll explain my reasoning tomorrow, if you don't mind.
In post 171, shaddowez wrote:I'll have some reads up in a little while
@Mod- Shouldn't we have prods and/or replacement requests at this point for the hydras?