Correct.In post 574, rb wrote:Okay so you think the convo is really natural but you think one of us is surely scum because you scumread both of us separately, ignoring that interaction, right?In post 572, MariaR wrote:I messed up quoting and put my vote in one of the quotes so let me cp it here and ignore it in the quote thing
This whole convo seems really natural and doesn't seem planned or forced from either side. Also
VOTE: Lickly I can't tell if you're just being close minded or you honestly think like that but re reading you're ISO you should have more votes then you do.
Mini 1820 — Lazy Summer Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
- MariaR
-
MariaR Alternatively,
- MariaR
- Alternatively,
- Alternatively,
- Posts: 19167
- Joined: July 11, 2016
- rb
-
rb Survivor
- rb
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Well that's boring
Thought there was gonna be some earth shattering theory where I could have Infinity as basically confirmed scum since I'm town and if there's something you saw that basically just makes one of us scum, then we could just lynch Infinity for ez scum lynch.
Now I just think you're throwing pointless shade- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- rb
-
rb Survivor
- rb
- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: June 18, 2016
- rb
-
rb Survivor
- rb
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Dude chill, I was just asleep for this shit show im still catching up now.In post 545, rb wrote:@Naomi: don't talk less. Activity is a good thing for town and if you think someone isn't pulling their weight it's perfectly fine for town to tell other players to pick up their involvement. Just because mods only require 1-2 posts per 24 hours doesn't mean that it's good for town players to only post 1-2 times per 24 hours.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
In post 545, rb wrote:@Naomi: don't talk less. Activity is a good thing for town and if you think someone isn't pulling their weight it's perfectly fine for town to tell other players to pick up their involvement. Just because mods only require 1-2 posts per 24 hours doesn't mean that it's good for town players to only post 1-2 times per 24 hours.
I think your the first person to scum read them both and have myself as town. Im not sure how I feel about this or where I am going with it, but I do find it different as we keep getting lumped togeather I think it shows that your not just going with the flow of the game and thought about all your interactions so.. good job?In post 565, MariaR wrote:
It's not your interactions that make you guys scum I just scumread both of you but reading interactions between the 2 of you I think only 1 of you are scum if you would like me to explain why are scum read the 2 of you I can do that.In post 564, rb wrote:Hey MariaR can you explain the one scum between RB/Infinity thing because I'm town and I'm struggling to see Infinity scum after our interactions.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Wanky is not a word >_<In post 573, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is wanky.In post 572, MariaR wrote:I messed up quoting and put my vote in one of the quotes so let me cp it here and ignore it in the quote thing
This whole convo seems really natural and doesn't seem planned or forced from either side. Also
VOTE: Lickly I can't tell if you're just being close minded or you honestly think like that but re reading you're ISO you should have more votes then you do.
Are you voting me for the same reason or not?Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
What the fuck is this? a vote with no text at this stage? omgus >_<
Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Okay so lets start commenting on the major things that happened now I done the little things. Firstly hello new replacement Glad to have another active contributor to the town who likes talking and now lets move onto the who LQ vs RB thing; This arugement feels very emotion filled. I don't care about meta though as it can give false reads. I'm going to be netural on the entire thing, it just felt like an emotion filled battle that had no real tells. which is basically what me and slandaar are upto speaking of lets do a follow up post and continue our arugement as well.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: June 18, 2016
Dgb looks bad now. Apparently she took your word for lq being lynchbait and it was enough to stop her from voting him before, but after being pressed by jar, it suddenly doesn't matter? :/In post 581, rb wrote:Do you think this wagon has scum on it then?
I'm iffy about the rem slot...need more content to sort out
Ips/rask/rem or ips/rask/rem i guess for now
And you don't really think lq is scum here do you?- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: June 18, 2016
Yeah I'm going to bed...In post 587, kraska77 wrote:Ips/rask/rem or ips/rask/rem i guess for now
One of them should be ips/rask/dgb- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Not really someone asked you to tell us why you voted, (which you still havn't done) and then you basically answered 'ill tell you later' and never did Your defence was a deflection of the question, deflecting is a defensive manuverIn post 542, Slandaar wrote:
Someone asked a question and I answered. That isn't a defence. If I ask you your name and you answer are you making a defence? no. I am not going to bother with the rest as it's similar but this should show you how you just want to create this false narrative due to bias and are trying to fit everything into it.In post 434, Naomi-Tan wrote:Someone asked why you voted with out information your defence was to say you'll post later, your misrepping me why?
RB summed this up perfectly But I'll also say it; Thinking and not talking denies town information, information they could use to determine your alignment and build on there own theories and change there veiw points, barely making the minamun post requirements and not talking about anything is not a good play style. Scum can use that to pressure and lynch you and town can't use it at all and makes our lifes hard. This is the reason every so often I do a block of reads so that other town players can look at them and question them and I don't just post a list I go through and explain my reads on each of them so that town can track my thought process. As such all the town players (and scum players) can see just what Im thinking at any given time. and to show how much it hurts our position you need only to look at scum power roles and town ones. Cop, Tracker, Watcher are all about gaining town information while Roleblocker, Janitor and framer are all based on erasing or giving miss leading information. As town are major tools are our words and just not talking and only thinking does nothing to help your team and will make it easier for scum to single you out and lynch you later in the game.In post 542, Slandaar wrote:
Below are your expectations, not the mods, not the sites, yours.In post 436, Naomi-Tan wrote:I'm not advising it because your not playing to my expectations
Think more, talk less.In post 436, Naomi-Tan wrote: i'm advising it because its post 436 and you have responded 13 times total and have only said 2 or 3 things of relevance in all that time. Also you are saying things (other than defences) with no backing behind them; Like start contributing if you are town! you have a win condition your meant to be trying to obtain
Advising people to replace is at best very impolite. I can demonstrate but I don't want to really I think you are just really naiive.
The top point shows everything I need to I won't be responding to anymore of your nonsense.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- JarJarDrinks
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- JarJarDrinks
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Here was the response:In post 543, Slandaar wrote:
I would like a response to this DGB. How exactly can you townread rb but not 'buy' the fake townslip reaction test?In post 431, Slandaar wrote:
You are not buying the fake townslip reaction test done by rb but think he is town eh? I see.In post 406, DrippingGoofball wrote:I think rb is town
I'm not buying the fake townslip reaction test either LOL
Pretty weak, which is why my vote is there.In post 462, DrippingGoofball wrote:
I think it's weird but ultimately NAIIn post 437, JarJarDrinks wrote:
Yeah I'd like to hear goofballs explanation here.In post 434, Naomi-Tan wrote:You are not buying the fake townslip reaction test done by rb but think he is town eh?- JarJarDrinks
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- JarJarDrinks
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: June 18, 2016
- Manuel87
-
Manuel87 Goon
- Manuel87
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 461
- Joined: April 26, 2016
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Well there is three logical explinations; Either A) they thought they was acting scummy and is a town role or B) They know them and think there a better player than them or C) They thought they was pro-town and losing a pro-town player isn't great for the game.In post 593, Manuel87 wrote:
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- kraska77
-
kraska77 Mafia Scum
- kraska77
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: June 18, 2016
I dislike that post by maria ^_^In post 593, Manuel87 wrote:
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.- Manuel87
-
Manuel87 Goon
- Manuel87
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 461
- Joined: April 26, 2016
Thank your for answering a question not direkted at youIn post 594, Naomi-Tan wrote:
Well there is three logical explinations; Either A) they thought they was acting scummy and is a town role or B) They know them and think there a better player than them or C) They thought they was pro-town and losing a pro-town player isn't great for the game.In post 593, Manuel87 wrote:
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.- Naomi-Tan
-
Naomi-Tan Mafia Scum
- Naomi-Tan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: August 30, 2012
Your welcome.In post 596, Manuel87 wrote:
Thank your for answering a question not direkted at youIn post 594, Naomi-Tan wrote:
Well there is three logical explinations; Either A) they thought they was acting scummy and is a town role or B) They know them and think there a better player than them or C) They thought they was pro-town and losing a pro-town player isn't great for the game.In post 593, Manuel87 wrote:
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.Naomi ~ ☠ ♠ ♣ ⦿ ✿ ♡ §- MariaR
-
MariaR Alternatively,
- MariaR
- Alternatively,
- Alternatively,
- Posts: 19167
- Joined: July 11, 2016
Because when I re read I'm gonna try and look at all of Rem's post and be bias and think they're towny when some of them could be scummy but I'm always gonna look at it from a town pov I wish I could of just re read and come back to give myself an answer so I could help explain the thought process around the posts.In post 593, Manuel87 wrote:
Can you explain why you said that please?In post 537, MariaR wrote:Kinda wish I didn't see who I replaced but oh well.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- MariaR
- Naomi-Tan
- Manuel87
- kraska77
- Naomi-Tan
- Manuel87
- kraska77
- JarJarDrinks
- JarJarDrinks
- Naomi-Tan
- kraska77
- kraska77
- Naomi-Tan
- Naomi-Tan
- Naomi-Tan
- Naomi-Tan
- Naomi-Tan
- rb
- kraska77
- DrippingGoofball
- rb
- MariaR