Directing where the scum read goes.In post 224, light_ganski wrote:Vedith, if you're not fake claiming and you scum read me I request that you investigate me tonight.
Yeah... That's town!
Message for Kyndy - SARCASM!!!
Directing where the scum read goes.In post 224, light_ganski wrote:Vedith, if you're not fake claiming and you scum read me I request that you investigate me tonight.
Nothing else to say.In post 227, light_ganski wrote:Oh please
Because it's a weak role.In post 230, NJAC wrote:Damn man! If you're truly the goon cop why do you think it's good play to claim this early? WTF?
I mean, I could be scum who picked nothing and giving a fake what's better to choose while choosing nothing and taking a gambit that the only other role in the game isn't Goon Cop.In post 232, light_ganski wrote:Honestly can't see him fakeclaiming here. After all if he gets to D3 alive we pretty much know he's lying
I only want to lynch Soya today.In post 229, light_ganski wrote:I disagree. Will roleclaim if I have to and if the other town players request it.
Would they?In post 235, light_ganski wrote:Because scum would NK you??
Disregard this, forgot town could have a bodyguard. But town have at least 3 PRs that aren't so thats unlikely.In post 235, light_ganski wrote:Because scum would NK you??
Which comment?In post 222, Vedith wrote:His comment about Superbowl is basically - "Yeah, we got our mis lynch tomorrow"
OK I see another incoming semi-semantic misunderstanding here so just gonna nip this one in the bud.In post 222, Vedith wrote:In post 220, SoraAdvent wrote:I want to know your meta before this.Scum found.In post 220, SoraAdvent wrote:As for why I said it was Vedith being Vedith, I think 95's a perfect example of the type of posts you make.
You want to know my meta, but you imply that you know it already from the type of posts I make.
This could be Vedith not being Vedith, but you have already decided that this is Vedith being Vedith while asking for meta on me.
And you can't say that this is wrong, because you are responding to a comment about me with saying that it's my usual play, just to ignore it (TYhis is what I get from, Vedith being Vedith).
Can you give me an example of scum trying to use this as an excuse?In post 222, Vedith wrote:The reason I have been holding out for my main comments is because I knew scum would try and use this as an excuse, as they don't actually scum hunt.
I find this helpful. Lets say im about to switch off to do hwk or something cause the game hasnt been moving. If I see "big post incoming" (esp. if it has a time) it lets me better manage when I'm reading/posting/off thread. Plus if I was going to make some big kyndy-esque iso breakdown it would help to know that they're going to be putting out a lot of content soon so I can hold off on that.In post 222, Vedith wrote:Also @Everyone - Stop saying you are going to do a big post, this isn't fucking school, put your hands down and just do one.
Did...You...Just...Say...What...He...Meant?! This is boarder line answering a question on someone else behalf. Now he can go "Yeah, that!"In post 239, superbowl9 wrote:What I read Sora's statement as was "just Vedith being Vedith from the typical way he's been playing in the game". Like I haven't metad NJAC (I don't like the whole concept of meta) but let's say he throws out another anti-town post. I could say "just more of NJAC being NJAC", cause that's what he's been doing for most of the game.
In post 237, Vedith wrote:Would they?In post 235, light_ganski wrote:Because scum would NK you??
There's no proof to my claim (Although I know there is no CC) in no way does my claim put scum at risk, even more so if they have taken roles.
Possible if they are all goons!
In post 240, Vedith wrote:Did...You...Just...Say...What...He...Meant?! This is boarder line answering a question on someone else behalf. Now he can go "Yeah, that!"
Vedith wrote:I only want to lynch Soya today.In post 229, light_ganski wrote:I disagree. Will roleclaim if I have to and if the other town players request it.
Talk to me about his meta comments while saying that my play is standard for me.
142 is towny because it explains why you think Lycanfire's questionable vote on me isn't a potential townread when I though it could be - if you were scum and lycanfire were town you'd have no reason to protect him from me scum reading him as it would make another potential mislynch available to you. You also stated the obvious that a decent scum player can respond to a reaction test in a way that looks towny.In post 222, Vedith wrote: Now, second scum I feel is Light ("Oh no, you think 2 people voting you are scum?!"). The reason being 202 - This post is basically a copy of what's already in the game. What pinged me so hard about it?
"142 is townie" - After the discussion of my 142 post had already happened. I'm 100% sure that if I didn't question 146, he would have called that town. I want to know here what makes it town, I mean I know what makes it a town but, but does he? He is saying what has already been said, and making his opinion, while he actually has none.
Please, do tell me how agreeing with a townread makes me scum. Not much of a case huh?In post 222, Vedith wrote: His comment about Superbowl is basically - "Yeah, we got our mis lynch tomorrow"
No.@ HighHopes - could you elaborate your read on Kyndy please
False: mafia roleblocker is NOT a possible role this game.Vedith wrote:scum can also pick a roleblocker themselves
Oh yeah, long day.In post 242, superbowl9 wrote:In post 240, Vedith wrote:Did...You...Just...Say...What...He...Meant?! This is boarder line answering a question on someone else behalf. Now he can go "Yeah, that!"Vedith wrote:I only want to lynch Soya today.In post 229, light_ganski wrote:I disagree. Will roleclaim if I have to and if the other town players request it.
Talk to me about his meta comments while saying that my play is standard for me.