.In post 315, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m not sure what to make of the Cheetory versus Fox back and forth other than to say it seems a little hyperbolic at points …
The votes on me are bad.
.In post 315, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m not sure what to make of the Cheetory versus Fox back and forth other than to say it seems a little hyperbolic at points …
In post 342, Grib wrote:Point out the fencesitting and the shade throwing, please.In post 340, hiplop wrote:VOTE: magna
315 is really scummy. Whole lotta fencesitting, shade throwing. I don't care about the part on me other than it serves no function. Why me in particular?
So much of it looks like trying to appear busy
Why did you call out the part about you specifically, and then state that you don't care about the part about you? They can't both be true.
Yeah, I was literally the only one voting for you at the time.In post 350, hiplop wrote:.In post 315, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m not sure what to make of the Cheetory versus Fox back and forth other than to say it seems a little hyperbolic at points …
The votes on me are bad.
this is a good pointIn post 349, DiamondSentinel wrote:Are you seriously beating the NO LURKERS drum when there's still 11 days left and prods haven't even gone out? Do you have anything to say about the things that active people are doing?
The one part about you? That's not fencesitty. Magna doesn't like your posting so far. Seems pretty straightforward.In post 359, hiplop wrote:i quoted a part of the post with fencesitting grib
and shut up diamondsentinel
Oh, you meant this. I skipped over it because the quote and response have nothing to do with each other.In post 350, hiplop wrote:.In post 315, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m not sure what to make of the Cheetory versus Fox back and forth other than to say it seems a little hyperbolic at points …
The votes on me are bad.
Actually, it's not. I was implying that you were scum.In post 335, DiamondSentinel wrote:There's a little something called implied guilt. That's exactly what you were doing. You didn't say something verbatim, but it was implied that that was the statement you were making.In post 331, Cephrir wrote:Anti-town? I didn't say that, you said that.In post 318, DiamondSentinel wrote:PEdit: That's not me being anti-town, Cephrir. It's just that what goes on in my head is complicated and doesn't really need to be explained. I don't expect you to trust me on that, but there are many others who do.
I know overdefensive is usually a shitty buzzword but I make exceptions now and then.
Yeah, scumreading one person maybe incorrectly, I must be such a fucking moron, no one has ever done that beforeIn post 335, DiamondSentinel wrote:Uh huh. Yep. Exactly what's happening here.In post 333, Cephrir wrote:"just give up you'll never catch us so don't try wahaha~~"In post 322, DiamondSentinel wrote:So, this will sound very weird, but it is my experience that the only time town finds a scum on D1 is when a. The scum is getting hardcore bussed, which then makes the others even harder to spot, or b. When the scumteam is so terrible the town would win anyways. So, my D1 strategy is to put town in the best possible standing for the rest of the game. (Sometimes I think this would be a NL, but this isn't one of those times)
Christ, you're so dense it's a wonder your head doesn't collapse into a black hole.
We's posted a lot of words but that doesn't mean you're obligated to townread him. I do not have a strong read on MOI at this time.
Why?In post 343, SnarkySnowman wrote:Hiplop wagon time?
It's not that it's wrong. It's that the manner of your wrongness is so unfathomably wrong that I was wrong in thinking it was possibly for someone to be so wrongly wrong.In post 368, Cephrir wrote:Actually, it's not. I was implying that you were scum.In post 335, DiamondSentinel wrote:There's a little something called implied guilt. That's exactly what you were doing. You didn't say something verbatim, but it was implied that that was the statement you were making.In post 331, Cephrir wrote:Anti-town? I didn't say that, you said that.In post 318, DiamondSentinel wrote:PEdit: That's not me being anti-town, Cephrir. It's just that what goes on in my head is complicated and doesn't really need to be explained. I don't expect you to trust me on that, but there are many others who do.
I know overdefensive is usually a shitty buzzword but I make exceptions now and then.
Yeah, scumreading one person maybe incorrectly, I must be such a fucking moron, no one has ever done that beforeIn post 335, DiamondSentinel wrote:Uh huh. Yep. Exactly what's happening here.In post 333, Cephrir wrote:"just give up you'll never catch us so don't try wahaha~~"In post 322, DiamondSentinel wrote:So, this will sound very weird, but it is my experience that the only time town finds a scum on D1 is when a. The scum is getting hardcore bussed, which then makes the others even harder to spot, or b. When the scumteam is so terrible the town would win anyways. So, my D1 strategy is to put town in the best possible standing for the rest of the game. (Sometimes I think this would be a NL, but this isn't one of those times)
Christ, you're so dense it's a wonder your head doesn't collapse into a black hole.
I have never felt "obligated" to read anybody one way or the other.In post 369, Cephrir wrote:We's posted a lot of words but that doesn't mean you're obligated to townread him. I do not have a strong read on MOI at this time.