noIn post 1189, Medical Junkies wrote:I know this isn't AI or anything, but do you have dial-up?
yeah... i'm not really in push mode yet more in sort mode but i'll keep that in mindIn post 1198, Grib wrote:Ah.
It's certainly one of the most concrete.
Feel free to sell me/everyone on a wagon you believe to be more viable.
sometimes people keep reasons close to their chestIn post 1195, Grib wrote:Like.
Blankly calling people town and scum != scumhunting.
589 is close, but still bad.
Let’s look at what you quote for scum-hunting and see where specifically I disagree.In post 1178, Fox McCloud wrote:looking and i still dont think i agree w "no scumhunting"
do you have a specific issue with a specific read?
They are voting Diamond for being “intolerable”. If you think that’s valid scum-hunting well then you don’t disagree with my vote and push on because I find Camnt (especially the Kats portion) intolerable. But beyond that they’ve picked the lowest of the low hanging fruit (Keyen) and Grib who as far as I can tell is some sort of personal beef. I’d challenge you to argue Camnt didn’t just pick three of the biggest contributors to the game in making this “reads list”.In post 1185, Fox McCloud wrote:diamondsentinel, grib, and Keyen are all scum and/or intolerable.
but the MOST intolerable?
unvote
VOTE: DiamondSentinel
Same comment re: Fox applies above as well ... except more likely scum anyway given my previous read on the slot.In post 1202, hiplop wrote:sometimes people keep reasons close to their chest
they JUST said they didn't have a strong read and didn't think the attacks against them were good.In post 1205, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m starting to question if Fox’s read on Camnt is colored by personal like for the individual heads or colored by knowing they aren’t a partner so assuming them to be Town …
Where did I say it wasn't possible? But given what I perceive to be a big hole in Fox's stance re: Camnt scum-hunting it would be remiss of me not to consider that other factors might be at play.In post 1207, Cephrir wrote:they JUST said they didn't have a strong read and didn't think the attacks against them were good.
why don't people understand this is possible?
noIn post 1205, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m starting to question if Fox’s read on Camnt is colored by personal like for the individual heads or colored by knowing they aren’t a partner so assuming them to be Town …
well this is a strong move towards a reasonable conversation...In post 1209, Fox McCloud wrote:noIn post 1205, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m starting to question if Fox’s read on Camnt is colored by personal like for the individual heads or colored by knowing they aren’t a partner so assuming them to be Town …
it's based on seeing them be lynchbait before and a good healthy dose of skepticism i've picked up over the pretty long amount of time playing this game.
but i see you're so far up your own ass that you apparently assume disagreement with your BULLETPROOF, SUPER AWESOME, BONER-INDUCING case HAS to be whiteknighting so i guess there goes any chances of having a reasonable conversation w you
okay.In post 983, Medical Junkies wrote:It's almost like the joke will be on you when we are confirmed town come the following day!
~M
who is your current pick for scum?In post 1213, DiamondSentinel wrote:Oh yes. This has been the general trend of conversation, Imperium.
why do you think that he is scum?In post 1100, keyenpeydee wrote:I'm keeping my vote for Snarky because I can see him scum too. Ya'know at least 60% of my read from him is scum.
Somewhere in the realm of camntsuki, cephrir, Fox (lower pick, though), hiplop, kdowns, and MJ. But this is a very very rough list. There is very little information for me to use effectively.In post 1215, Imperium wrote:who is your current pick for scum?In post 1213, DiamondSentinel wrote:Oh yes. This has been the general trend of conversation, Imperium.
i didn't say scumhunting, grib said that.In post 1204, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So basically everything you showed at 1185 isn’t scum-hunting and I question why you’d endeavor to pretend it is even closely related to being such.
My cute but irrelevant tale is why I personally am not voting him at this point in time; I've also responded to your case and where I felt it went wrong, so if you're looking to actually talk why you think that Snarky is scum with me, I'd recommend that as a good jumping off point.In post 1102, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Also the Snarky wagon dissipating on Nachos cute but irrelevant “Oh, no-one can read him” tale I think will be a great place to start looking for bussers who hopped at the first sign of an easy exit.
@Imperium – why are you ignoring my question about Tammy’s participation in the hydra?
I'd argue that your posts have been mostly speculation and nothing but and I expected a bit more from you by now, but I suppose I don't actually remember playing a game with you from the start, so meh.In post 1122, DiamondSentinel wrote:Neither.In post 1114, keyenpeydee wrote:This is suspicious. Wanting to lynch this "kid" means that you can have another day OR maybe avoid this lynch so that you can kill this night huh?In post 1111, DiamondSentinel wrote:Can we hurry up and lynch this kid. I could really use a new day.
It's so that we can get out of fucking day 1. I hate D1 with a fiery passion. It's 100% speculation.
you don't see how this is frustrating...?In post 1211, Imperium wrote:well this is a strong move towards a reasonable conversation...In post 1209, Fox McCloud wrote:noIn post 1205, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’m starting to question if Fox’s read on Camnt is colored by personal like for the individual heads or colored by knowing they aren’t a partner so assuming them to be Town …
it's based on seeing them be lynchbait before and a good healthy dose of skepticism i've picked up over the pretty long amount of time playing this game.
but i see you're so far up your own ass that you apparently assume disagreement with your BULLETPROOF, SUPER AWESOME, BONER-INDUCING case HAS to be whiteknighting so i guess there goes any chances of having a reasonable conversation w you
i don't remember your behavior from Machina, all I remember is a townread that I don't really have here although that could be in part to not really reading the entire day. I don't think that your scumhunting has been anything impressive or memorable (your vote on camntsuki is a holdover from RVS, right?), you've been quick to chime in on useless conversations but nothing that seems like it could possibly be going anywhere. I'm willing to give you time since the paranoia will inevitably set in if you're town.In post 1220, DiamondSentinel wrote:You played Machina mafia with me.
And you should recognize that my behavior lines up almost exactly with that game.