In post 1735, Saru wrote: In post 1731, TierShift wrote:Saru is playing like shit and basing 2/3 of his reads off of preflip interactions which is really really bad
I'm rethinking this town read
So what about my read on you then? Is that bad as well? And why exactly? Be specific(I know that's not your forte, but try).
You apparently don't like the Texcat wagon, but also haven't really explained why Dwlee's case on Texcat was bad. You said it wasn't even a case, but didn't even explain why. Texcat also said she didn't agree with my scum read on you, but didn't explain why.
Also don't like Texcat's whole "Saru is the voice of reason" but then "meh his Tier scum read is wrong."
Not liking this butt-fucking between you two.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: texcat
If this flips red, I'm voting vulture boy next.
Yeah it's just that I find dwlee ultimately uninteresting.
Why I disliked you is the fact that you are chaining lynches. You did it with blackstar (if blackstar is scum, we kill xfk and tiershift) and now you're doing it with texcat (if texcat is scum, we lynch tier). You cannot find reasons to scumread players, so you just associatively scumread them, which is the easiest for scum to fake.
Next, you indicated that you dislike the texcat wagon and now you jump on it with the justification that me and texcat defend each other? That cancels out the whole disgust that you had before?
And do not try me with the 'being specific is not your forte' remarks. That's just plain unnecessary.
So what I want to know is who you really think is scum here. Before you thought it was blackstar, now it's suddenly texcat based on almost nothing. Who do you scumread by something else than associations?
It's sad that you just throw me in your scumpile by first saying I'm blackstar's and xfkyu's buddy and then 1 page or so later i'm suddenly texcat's buddy. Then you didn't really believe in your theory at first, did you?
