DudeIn post 1946, JarJarDrinks wrote:meh who cares?
I'm probably gonna get impatient by the time I leave work today and spill what I know also.
Whoever it is can make their claim based around it
And/or hiplop
Just dont
DudeIn post 1946, JarJarDrinks wrote:meh who cares?
I'm probably gonna get impatient by the time I leave work today and spill what I know also.
WHAT THE FUCKIn post 1949, Vedith wrote:I'm serious! I don't believe you!In post 1948, MariaR wrote:I can't tell if you're srs or not Ved stop scaring me.In post 1947, Vedith wrote:Maria is talking bollocks anyway
This will be a laughIn post 1955, MariaR wrote:I can't tell what roles would be likely and what wouldn't be on this site that's why I asked what visits
Don't really think it's that unlikely w/ this setup. But even still, I'd believe Maria before I'd believe Vedith.In post 1952, Infinity 324 wrote:Tracker and a watcher is unlikely.
He was also trying to call me a liar over DGB.In post 1959, Infinity 324 wrote:Didn't you scumread maria?
ScumIn post 1961, MariaR wrote:I think the best order should of been "Who's an invest pr" and they claim last with reports incase we have any cc's that f up the claims not the order person wise
You don't scumread me because you're not shallowIn post 1964, Vedith wrote:ScumIn post 1961, MariaR wrote:I think the best order should of been "Who's an invest pr" and they claim last with reports incase we have any cc's that f up the claims not the order person wise
I am shallow! :<In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow
What "slip" I gotta see thisIn post 1967, Vedith wrote:I am shallow! :<In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow
Your slip was fake though.
a lil bit.In post 1959, Infinity 324 wrote:Didn't you scumread maria?
*SoftingIn post 1968, MariaR wrote:What "slip" I gotta see thisIn post 1967, Vedith wrote:I am shallow! :<In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow
Your slip was fake though.
I asked what roles visit and I didn't think of it as a soft at first but then I re read it and I saw how obv it was it wasn't suppose to BE a soft but when I looked at it I guess it wasIn post 1970, Vedith wrote:*SoftingIn post 1968, MariaR wrote:What "slip" I gotta see thisIn post 1967, Vedith wrote:I am shallow! :<In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow
Your slip was fake though.
You said the following;In post 1971, MariaR wrote:I asked what roles visit and I didn't think of it as a soft at first but then I re read it and I saw how obv it was it wasn't suppose to BE a soft but when I looked at it I guess it was
example: Where I play watcher doesn't visit but from I was told it does here? So I wanted to see a list of roles that didn't visit so my report matches up/don't have a un needed cc
(don't say wtf why did you say you have a report!) It's really obv I do.
You then later saidIn post 1888, MariaR wrote:Can you tell me the roles that don't visit?
You then hated that you softed it with this (after drawing more attention to it)In post 1933, MariaR wrote:I think everyone already knows my role.
You then fake AtEIn post 1940, MariaR wrote:Yeah that was me softing by mistake and I hit my face on my desk for asking
In post 1948, MariaR wrote:I can't tell if you're srs or not Ved stop scaring me.
Then realise I won't buy your fake AtE, so go back to normal.In post 1951, MariaR wrote:WHAT THE FUCK