don't like this defense from Dragonfire.In post 1188, Dragonfire wrote:This is a misrep. If you looked closely at my post, you'd have seen the word "likely" in there. I said that my death would likely cause another townie's death, because copper was likely town to me at that point, whereas DDD straight-up implied that he knew GL was town for certain.goodmorning wrote:whatDragonfire wrote: Well the issue is that when I am lynched and flip town, you'll probably be next, as I won't be around to argue against your lynch and most people seem to think either you or I is scum. So I'd rather not die, knowing that my death will likely cause the death of another townie. I would be fine with my lynch if you agreed to lynch DDD tomorrow after my flip, but it seems like that's not going to happen.
^just to point out that Dragon did a thing he thinks is scummy.Dragonfire wrote:So you're implying that you know GL is town... only scum know others' alignment for sure. You might have slipped there.DDD wrote: It wasn't forever, it was like a day and why would scum need to change their mind? Changing your mind and lynching a townie looks awful, look how much shit everyone is giving GL for it. Why would scum who were safely ensconced on their wagons of choice feel the need to do anything when GL was going to have to decide and take the fall for them?
Not like Town never do that, but...
in context, the way you used "likely" reads like the "likely" event is copper getting lynched tomorrow, not copper being town. The way you're trying to argue that "likely" was supposed to be a modifier for your read on his alignment is using semantics to hide holes in your reasoning.
VOTE: Dragonfire
