In post 1101, MortFeld wrote:Thanks for this assessment. I really don't see Red playing the way you are, especially when you've been at L-2 for such a long time. Earlier I said that I don't see Green!HS as likely, I do think that you've done certain things that logically should not come from town.In post 1095, Human Sequencer wrote:Wobbs isn't a green read. All of my green read comes from Copper. Wobbs looks like a fool to be honest, his misrepping is horrible. This is why I'd need a case.
The copper greenread is mostly because of the effort he put into gamesolving.
He acted consistently within himself, as in he never had a contradiction of motive or otherwise. His opinions logically changed when he found reason to (see post 159) and in his argument with you and TwoFace, he picked his side and stuck with it.
His analysis of scum likely opportunistically jumping on his wagon is very credible, and my read of his argument with you and TF screams TvTT to me.
Posts like 429 and [post]463] just don't come from scum in my eyes, especially the latter which is filled with logically consistent reads that coincide with what he's expressed recently.
Drone, your vote of HS is basically because of this. What do you think of the idea that, judging from HS' more recent posts, they are actually VT and were fumbling with theory with all that PR hunting?
Pedit: it's not important, but it seems like you're saying you won't be able to catch up and post until Monday.
UNVOTE: HSIn post 1122, TwoFace wrote:Well it's a non issue now but if we did NL, today it wouldn't hurt town as much as if we mislynchIn post 1119, MortFeld wrote:@TF - You think no lynch benefits town here? Why?
Why is this wagon still on?