In post 1269, MortFeld wrote:On mobile, will give game - related response when I get home. This question is 50% for me in future games and 50% so I can get a better idea of what you meant by hereby newbies - in what ways does my play differ from the MS norm?
Youre very very focused on logic to the point that you dont seem to consider mistakes through miscommunication, disagreement in what consistutes reasoning for a read, and misunderstandings
As an example, my Creeps vote wasnt really important to the game, it was literally the equivalent to an RVS vote (which i deemed appropriate at the time bc id just replaced in and hadnt read)
it wasnt moved for a while because i didnt have a strong enough scumread to move to
And i wasnt lying when i said it was just for fun/curiousity
I mean, if it had been a reaction test, it would have been a very bad one. if creeps reacts to the vote, then its probably his meta. if he doesnt, then your impression of him was wrong, thats all.
I think neither of us communicated very well, in large part to our very different approaches to the game.
HS literally explained it down to a T, i was scumreading you because i didnt know you properly, after reading you im much more confident thats just how you are. And hispoint about my sig and the logical hops he made from there about my personality were also on point
I dont think your playstyle is bad in the least! But theres def this sense i get from you of you looking for 'tells' and then matching a players play to thos etells to read them. like checking items off on a list instead of looking at possible motivations between each actions.
I could also be wrong, of course. i hope we get to play in the future when im more engaged so i can learn more about you. these are just my impressions from this game.
and on second thought i dont think youre that far removed from normal ms play. youre just different from me
