Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

[JaeReed]

VC 1.01

Sesq (3)

: ssbm_Kyouko, Transcend, rb

ironstove (1)

: iamafluffyrabbit

shannon (1)

: Lil Uzi Vert

Drone (1)

: Kohai

rb (1)

: ironstove

Transcend (1)

: Sesq

Lil Uzi Vert (1)

: shannon

NOT VOTING (4)

: Impoetic, drealmerz7, Drone, TTTT

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-10 12:30:00)

Transcend is V/LA until the 26th.

Drone is V/LA until the 26th.

Kohai is V/LA until the 28th.

[Transcend]

VOTE: Sesq

I can always policy lynch quote pyramids

ah fuck yes

rb has given our bandwagon his stamp of approval

now let's just hope he's town

[ssbm_Kyouko]

now let's just hope he's town

r u me?

[Transcend]

wot

[ssbm_Kyouko]

I just made a note "48 - enter rb:gets on the first wagon that is picking up with real intent but attributes his vote to an rvs policy lynch"
His motivation here is either scummy or towny so I'm hoping he's town

[Transcend]

ssbm is town



guys

i think . . .

let's not put him behind bars today

[drealmerz7]

nah, gots to let it stew a bit and see where it goes

[Sesq]

o fuck we're getting some wagoning going on here. I'm going to start being (slightly) more serious now, though. If I had to try and place the most suspicious character thus far, it would probably be iamafluffyrabbit for this statement:

i am town we are never lynching me thanks

and I'm going to vote it. VOTE: iamafluffyrabbit

I don't have any other solid reads so far.

[Transcend]

what do u not like about it . . .

you're being way too inconsistent and jumpy for my tasted hun

[Transcend]

tastes*

[Sesq]

what do u not like about it . . .

you're being way too inconsistent and jumpy for my tasted hun

It's an assertion with no evidence backing it. It isn't even a scumread, it's more of a reaction gague so far.

As for playstyle, I haven't done a forum mafia game in 3 years, and I don't really know what I'm doing or how to play. I'm also excited because it's something I just really wanna doOHWHATTHEHELLTHERESNOCATFACES

I'll find my groove eventually, maybe. Until then I'll be your wildcard

[drealmerz7]

so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...

[Transcend]

okay so i get ur point but why are u outing it's a reaction test

[Sesq]

okay so i get ur point but why are u outing it's a reaction test

I wasn't outing them and the two aren't mutually exclusive.

I think that I'm trying to jump into everything too fast. I'll UNVOTE: and wait for anything readable to come up. Until then I'll be reloading thread at least once every 15 seconds.

[shannon]

so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...

Or you know, maybe they haven't had time to vote yet? I'll have to go back and look at the wagon, but it's interesting that you're trying to narrow it down to either the wagon target or the wagon members, at this early stage.

VOTE: Drealmerz

[Transcend]

[Sesq]

so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...

Or you know, maybe they haven't had time to vote yet? I'll have to go back and look at the wagon, but it's interesting that you're trying to narrow it down to either the wagon target or the wagon members, at this early stage.

VOTE: Drealmerz

The presupposition of the fourth voter being potential scum seems really off to me. I think the current votes are jokes, and that assuming things at this stage would be unwise.

pedit: I agree. don't know what to make of this either.

[drealmerz7]

so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...

Or you know, maybe they haven't had time to vote yet? I'll have to go back and look at the wagon, but it's interesting that you're trying to narrow it down to either the wagon target or the wagon members, at this early stage.

VOTE: Drealmerz

*wink* hi fish!

tis what I meant by "stew" in my previous post, but then decided, no, there's been time, I'm comfortable with this analysis.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Sesq reads newb town to me.

Sesq:

Just take your time and let things come naturally. Before you do though, could you tell me who you find to be most suspicious person on your wagon?

[Transcend]

the thing with Sesq is that actions are scummy as fuck but tone is pretty twony

[Lil Uzi Vert]

I'm not really seeing any scum intent in her posts though, she's just running around like a headless chicken.

[iamafluffyrabbit]

i'll say i mindmeld with the above 2 evaluations of sesq

[drealmerz7]

VOTE: rb

[Transcend]

I'm not really seeing any scum intent in her posts though, she's just running around like a headless chicken.

maybe

scum too, can run around like headless chickens tho

it's only page 3 i'm not calling this lol

[Lil Uzi Vert]

VOTE: rb

Mind sharing why?