Drone is V/LA until the 26th.
Kohai is V/LA until the 28th.
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
No way dude. You mean my motivation could be scummy OR towny? What an enlightening post, it's so good I think I might justIn post 54, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I just made a note "48 - enter rb:gets on the first wagon that is picking up with real intent but attributes his vote to an rvs policy lynch"
His motivation here is either scummy or towny so I'm hoping he's town
I like this post. Shannon can be town for nowIn post 64, shannon wrote:Or you know, maybe they haven't had time to vote yet? I'll have to go back and look at the wagon, but it's interesting that you're trying to narrow it down to either the wagon target or the wagon members, at this early stage.In post 61, drealmerz7 wrote:so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...
VOTE: Drealmerz
Fear vote imo. At least it's what I'll tell myself to feel good.
Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
Maybe. I don't think he liked your vote on Sesq but at the same time I don't think that's the case because he said he was going to let things stew. His vote reads a little off to me because I thought he would wait a bit more before laying down a serious vote.
It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.In post 84, Sesq wrote:Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
EBWOPIn post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping his vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.In post 84, Sesq wrote:Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.
I fail to see how weird RVS junk makes anyone scum though :/In post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.In post 84, Sesq wrote:Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.
Well the whole point of RVS is to catch hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting.In post 88, Sesq wrote:I fail to see how weird RVS junk makes anyone scum though :/In post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.In post 84, Sesq wrote:Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.
I will agree with rb, I have similar impulses.
Non-Alignment-Indicative.In post 90, Sesq wrote:Can you enlighten me on what NAI means? Wiki doesn't have it on their abbreviation page, and I don't remember it from 2013.
do u mean transcend sheeps rb powerfucking the mafia part deux?In post 83, Transcend wrote:VOTE: rb
im afraid this cannot be transcend and rb powerfuck the mafia part deux
This post got buried earlier, I'll respond now.In post 49, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This is backwards to meHe says "If you say RVS isn't over" then votes youbecauseyou said that. That is not a random vote, that is a vote with a reason. So why pretend it is rvs? Why not call you out for perpetuating a gamestate that doesn't lead us any closer to scum?