Open 658 Making Friends and Enemies | Game Over

Creature · Post Post #1600 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:21 am

It doesn't really make sense scum would claim VT then mason.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1601 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:21 am

In post 1581, Secret Agent Jin wrote:
In post 1579, BK201 wrote:
In post 1574, Creature wrote:What if we try to lynch the other scum?
How do you suggest we do that without any confirms/flips. I'm voting for who I believe is scum, it's less reliable to go for who I think that person's partner is because I have to be right about 2 things instead of 1 thing. Same goes for everyone on SAJ wagon too.
You are right about the vote for who you think is scum thing but the problem is everyone on my wagon will be prime suspects tomorrow after my flip.

this is laughable

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1602 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:23 am

In post 1599, Creature wrote:No, I don't.

then, why are we lynching the OTHER scum now??

Creature · Post Post #1603 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:24 am

It's an hypotesis. If SAJ were scum, he'd have another scum out there.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1604 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:25 am

In post 1595, havingfitz wrote:So I think silence implicates SAJ further and really there is no way around the other mason not vouching if SAJ's claim is legit.

Branching off this, on the VERY SLIGHT CHANCE there is a mason that is really holding out to not expose themselves to scum, pls claim intent to hammer on SAJ

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1605 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:26 am

In post 1603, Creature wrote:It's an hypotesis. If SAJ were scum, he'd have another scum out there.

potential slip or not I still can't see the pro town reason to do that

havingfitz · Post Post #1606 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:32 am

In post 1604, Flubbernugget wrote:on the VERY SLIGHT CHANCE there is a mason that is really holding out to not expose themselves to scum, pls claim intent to hammer on SAJ

If SAJ is scum I suspect both masons are already on the wagon. Otherwise they would have hammered. Unless they're dragging the day out in hopes of outing a scum partner.

Creature · Post Post #1607 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:34 am

Titus plan turned out to be a fail.

Creature · Post Post #1608 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:35 am

Counterclaims?

tojam2 · Post Post #1609 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:52 am

In post 1543, Titus wrote:Hey, Jin's posting on this page alone is enough.

1) I vote Jin.
2) He wants to work through my reasonong, as if he knows I am town.
3) VC happens
4) Jin attempts to throw mud at Creature, while saying he "could agree on me".
5)Jin pleads for people to get off "because they'll look bad" which is inconsistent with both mafia allegedly being on his wagon.

Bonus 1539 looks copied from a scum pt.

I was pretending to hammer.

tojam2 · Post Post #1610 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:56 am

Also, we may go to LYLO if we mislynch, but if one is scum, the other is most likely mason.

So either Titus is telling the truth or SAJ is not outing himself yet.
Him being mason would explain some of his erratic activity maybe.

Creature · Post Post #1611 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:30 am

That's enough shade.

Creature · Post Post #1612 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:30 am

Flubbernugget, havingfitz, Titus

Scum are there

Creature · Post Post #1613 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:31 am

Anyone counterclaims mason? If not, then SAJ shall no longer be lynched today and whoever pushes him will be autolynched.

havingfitz · Post Post #1614 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:36 am

If SAJ is scum you join BK and Tojam as suspects

havingfitz · Post Post #1615 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:37 am

In post 1613, Creature wrote:Anyone counterclaims mason? If not, then SAJ shall no longer be lynched today and whoever pushes him will be autolynched.

It's been pointed out already how masons have no reason to cc SAJ if he's fakeclaiming.

havingfitz · Post Post #1616 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:40 am

In post 1595, havingfitz wrote:If SAJ is today's lynch and flips scum...odds are his partner is BK or Flubber so a town win is almost guaranteed.

EBWOP...Flubber is voting SAJ. Doubt he is scum if SAJ is scum. SAJ scum would implicate BK..Creature........tojam.

Titus · Post Post #1617 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:43 am

In post 1609, tojam2 wrote:
In post 1543, Titus wrote:Hey, Jin's posting on this page alone is enough.

1) I vote Jin.
2) He wants to work through my reasonong, as if he knows I am town.
3) VC happens
4) Jin attempts to throw mud at Creature, while saying he "could agree on me".
5)Jin pleads for people to get off "because they'll look bad" which is inconsistent with both mafia allegedly being on his wagon.

Bonus 1539 looks copied from a scum pt.
I was pretending to hammer.

That doesn't work. You had a vote tag and a tag in the same post.

Titus · Post Post #1618 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:45 am

Seems like my plan is being followed. Good.

So, the question is if Creature gets smart and follows my plan or if he's scum with SAJ or masons being infuratingly stubborn to stupid plan.

Creature · Post Post #1619 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:46 am

In post 1615, havingfitz wrote:
In post 1613, Creature wrote:Anyone counterclaims mason? If not, then SAJ shall no longer be lynched today and whoever pushes him will be autolynched.
It's been pointed out already how masons have no reason to cc SAJ if he's fakeclaiming.

You paying no attention could mean you're scum (seeing Aubrey and sad1492 nightkills).

Creature · Post Post #1620 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:48 am

I vouch.

Titus · Post Post #1621 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:49 am

UNVOTE: SAJ

VOTE: toejam

Creature · Post Post #1622 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:49 am

Anyone counterclaims us?

Creature · Post Post #1623 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:49 am

You can't be that bad.

havingfitz · Post Post #1624 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:51 am

In post 1619, Creature wrote:(seeing Aubrey and sad1492 nightkills).

What does this evening mean?

In post 1620, Creature wrote:I vouch.

UNVOTE: