Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

[JaeReed]

VC 1.29

rb (5)

: Transcend, drealmerz7, ssbm_Kyouko, Sesq, gerryoat

-- L-2!

gerryoat (2)

: TTTT, ironstove

TTTT (1)

: Titus

Transcend (1)

: shannon

Sesq (1)

: rb

NOT VOTING (3)

: Impoetic, Lil Uzi Vert, Drone

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-10 12:30:00)

Impoetic is V/LA until the 4th.

[Drone]

Could you explain what you meant by "reaction vote"?

are you new here?

Yes, I am.
Explain please, there's this oddity where people define terms for themselves, according to their interpretation.

[Drone]

Even better, you have full access to this information.
Why bother asking?

[Transcend]

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

[Drone]

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

TIT

Innovative method to show activity.

[ssbm_Kyouko]

SSBM - I might be mistaken but I didn't think many people voted RB because of Ironstone's meta case. (You are referring to Ironstone's point about how many images or gifs he used in his play, right?). Also, weren't half of us scum reading Ironstone at the point he made that post?

If anything, I would say that Ironstone's meta case was a minor point against RB, and that most people are/were sheeping Transcend or responding to Transcend's pressure. Have I misunderstood?

Not sure. That is what I was referring to though. Lots of people were feeling suspicious about his posting patterns I think but idk how many people had him as a strong SR. I thought I remembered someone commenting that they thought it was a good catch but maybe not. I'm not sure that any of the votes on rb are sheeps. If people would sheep Transcend rb would be lynched.

[gerryoat]

Could you explain what you meant by "reaction vote"?

are you new here?

Yes, I am.
Explain please, there's this oddity where people define terms for themselves, according to their interpretation.

you're looking like you're trying to hard. not sure if you're always like this tho

[TTTT]

@Gerry
I see you are again refusing to answer easy questions
And still waiting on you to post anything helpful to town

@rb
you also never answered my question

[shannon]

SSBM - I might be mistaken but I didn't think many people voted RB because of Ironstone's meta case. (You are referring to Ironstone's point about how many images or gifs he used in his play, right?). Also, weren't half of us scum reading Ironstone at the point he made that post?

If anything, I would say that Ironstone's meta case was a minor point against RB, and that most people are/were sheeping Transcend or responding to Transcend's pressure. Have I misunderstood?

Not sure. That is what I was referring to though. Lots of people were feeling suspicious about his posting patterns I think but idk how many people had him as a strong SR. I thought I remembered someone commenting that they thought it was a good catch but maybe not. I'm not sure that any of the votes on rb are sheeps. If people would sheep Transcend rb would be lynched.

That was me, I said that if RB does flip scum then it's a good catch by Ironstone. I town read ironstone for that whole post but after it I checked RB's iso and found it non-scummy.

[Drone]

Could you explain what you meant by "reaction vote"?

are you new here?

Yes, I am.
Explain please, there's this oddity where people define terms for themselves, according to their interpretation.

you're looking like you're trying to hard. not sure if you're always like this tho

That is, how you receive my transmission.
Is that your answer to my question? Cause you can also ask for a vote, it would be a shorter way for the same outcome.

[gerryoat]

Drone and TTTT you both are caught up on the wrong things again. It's obvious what a reaction vote is. It's obvious what a joke is. That is why you 2 dumbs are the only one focused on two trivial things. And TTTT that is why you are being scumread.

[Drone]

VOTE: Gerryoat

[TTTT]

Drone and TTTT you both are caught up on the wrong things again. It's obvious what a reaction vote is. It's obvious what a joke is. That is why you 2 dumbs are the only one focused on two trivial things. And TTTT that is why you are being scumread.

You haven't shared any reads
You haven't done anything to advance the game
Your first vote was an unexplained "reaction vote"
Your second vote was on a wagoned player after he claimed a pr
You refuse to answer simple questions
You've also implicitly townread me over and over

Gerry deserves rope for 1087 if nothing else.

[drealmerz7]

I could vote gerry, but, rb should be the lynch today ppl

it's such an easy wagon to read too, no scum on it, they don't want to lose their rb

flip this scum and lets' find the others

[Drone]

Nope. Gerryoat is a fine lynch.

[drealmerz7]

but rb is much much much much better

[TTTT]

I could vote gerry, but, rb should be the lynch today ppl

it's such an easy wagon to read too, no scum on it, they don't want to lose their rb

flip this scum and lets' find the others

gerry is on the rb wagon
so there is that

[TTTT]

@drealm
why the urgency to lynch a claimed pr if you have another wagon you also think is a good lynch?

[Drone]

It's called confbiasing.

[drealmerz7]

they're totally different degrees of things

I swear this site and it's "omg don't lynch a claimed PR on D1!!" mindset - is there ever any claim BUT a PR on D1 here? I guess vanilla townies...

[drealmerz7]

It's called confbiasing.

no, it's called NOT KNOWING and seeing varying possibilities depending on different things

[TTTT]

@Titus
So what's it going to take to get you into a shiny new gerrywagon today?
I can give you great trade-in value on that TTTTwagon you are currently driving.

[Titus]

No sale.

[TTTT]

then at least explain how you are voting your gut over a clear scum case on gerry

[gerryoat]

Titus can you vote rb?