Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1650 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:56 pm

In post 1042, Drone wrote:
In post 1038, Transcend wrote:DRONE GET THE FUCK BACK ON THE FUCKING RB LYNCH THIS FUCKING INSTANT DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND ME
No good reason.
We have him claimed, I rather believe his claim than yours for the sake of the matter.

this doesn't make sense at all - the rb BP claim STINKSLIKESHIT and while transcend's timing and way he goes about all that is awful, it was still obvi-town and didn't seem fake at all

ugh

I don't fucking know

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1651 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:57 pm

I could lynch LUV absolutely

that claim is shit

TTTT · Post Post #1652 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:08 pm

Feels good on the LUV train.

gerryoat · Post Post #1653 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:16 pm

I've only been telling people to vote LUV the past 3 pages

Titus · Post Post #1654 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:18 pm

In post 1653, gerryoat wrote:I've only been telling people to vote LUV the past 3 pages

Why not Drone?

TTTT · Post Post #1655 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:23 pm

In post 1653, gerryoat wrote:I've only been telling people to vote LUV the past 3 pages

Didn't I tell you we would become BFFs?

Titus · Post Post #1656 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:25 pm

Hey, anyone going to look at Drone or is this one of those games where we play ignore Titus, call her scummy, and just carry on?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1657 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:30 pm

I looked at drone

he's iffy

you're scummy

LUV is scummy

drone+LUV doesn't match

you+LUV matches

drone doesn't match with anyone cept maybe TTTT

Titus · Post Post #1658 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:46 pm

Drealmerz, I have no idea how you reach any conclusion, so it goes in the reject bin. As of right now, you seem to pursue LUV must be scum, so Drone cannot be. Yet, you are pursuing me? This reeks of more wanting things to be true than them actually being true.

Sesq · Post Post #1659 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:08 pm

In post 1632, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1628, Sesq wrote:
In post 1627, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a case. Ignore him.
this looks really scummy/dismissive tbh

almost ready to vote you
It isn't. His case is basically I don't believe it's possible for a mini Normal to have two investigative roles and I only claimed because I didn't want to her lynched. The first point is false since you can ask any mod or look at past games to verify that such a setup is possible and the second is just dumb. Of course I don't want to get lynched. Who does?

I agree with you on setups, but claiming w/ little evidence and the aforementioned dismissiveness do not look good.

JaeReed · Post Post #1660 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:10 pm

VC 2.09

Titus (4)

: ssbm_Kyouko, drealmerz7, Lil Uzi Vert, Drone

-- L-2!

Lil Uzi Vert (2)

: gerryoat, TTTT

NOT VOTING (5)

: Impoetic, Titus, ironstove, Sesq, shannon

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-22 01:30:00)

As ironstove has not picked up his prod I am searching for a replacement.

Sesq · Post Post #1661 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:15 pm

In post 1656, Titus wrote:Hey, anyone going to look at Drone or is this one of those games where we play ignore Titus, call her scummy, and just carry on?

it's like viva but multiple people and less stupid

anyway, looking back on LUV's response I'm pretty confident in that vote VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert

JaeReed · Post Post #1662 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:19 pm

Raskolnikov replaces ironstove! Please welcome him!

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1663 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:28 pm

Hey guys

shannon · Post Post #1664 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:30 pm

Hi, welcome!

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1665 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:33 pm

So I haven't actually been following this, came in to inflate my winrate through that d1

Can I get a summary of what's going on atm?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1666 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:34 pm

uhhh no that is a misrep I'm not pursuing LUV is scum so drone cannot be

that is backwards from how I got to where I'm at

you're the primary read, you realize

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1667 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:37 pm

Shannon dreamer can you summarise the titus wagon real quick?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1668 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:46 pm

In post 1649, shannon wrote:
In post 1632, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1628, Sesq wrote:
In post 1627, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a case. Ignore him.
this looks really scummy/dismissive tbh

almost ready to vote you
It isn't. His case is basically I don't believe it's possible for a mini Normal to have two investigative roles
and I only claimed because I didn't want to her lynched.
The first point is false since you can ask any mod or look at past games to verify that such a setup is possible and the
second is just dumb. Of course I don't want to get lynched.
Who does?
Just read this again...

Your answer is a bit of a non-sequitur. The accusation you quote is that you only claimed because you didn't want *her* (me) lynched. You counter that by calling it dumb, because 'of course I (you) don't want to get lynched'.

I think you've revealed your true purpose in the claim here, and it wasn't to give info on me, it was to save your own ass.

Anyone else see this or am I reading it wrong?

I meant get..

I claimed because I had to explain my TR on you.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1669 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:48 pm

In post 1661, Sesq wrote:
In post 1656, Titus wrote:Hey, anyone going to look at Drone or is this one of those games where we play ignore Titus, call her scummy, and just carry on?
it's like viva but multiple people and less stupid

anyway, looking back on LUV's response I'm pretty confident in that vote VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert

Sesq, I trusted you!

If I get lynched just sheep my final reads.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1670 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:50 pm

In post 1539, shannon wrote:
In post 1531, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Crazy theory I'm nurturing: Impoetic/Titus scum team. The main reason I am TRing both of them is a combination of the conversation they had with each other and relying on Transcend's gut reads. Problem is, day talk is on and that whole conversation could have been rehearsed in the scum PT. Rabbit judged Impoetic as town for how fast she responded, saying that if she was scum it would be really hard to fake those responses so fast. Also note that neither of them would vote for rb yesterday iirc (can't check on mobile atm)
Now this ... this is interesting.

It's also interesting that Titus is being deliberately obtuse, by pretending not to know that D7 was talking to her in 1534.

We can always come back to LUV if we need to, but I think we should push this for info. It's so out there it just might be true.

VOTE: Titus

Shannon started on titus based on a side conspiracy theory from kyoukyo which kyoukyo himself didn't believe in??

Sesq · Post Post #1671 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:53 pm

In post 1669, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1661, Sesq wrote:
In post 1656, Titus wrote:Hey, anyone going to look at Drone or is this one of those games where we play ignore Titus, call her scummy, and just carry on?
it's like viva but multiple people and less stupid

anyway, looking back on LUV's response I'm pretty confident in that vote VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert
Sesq, I trusted you!

If I get lynched just sheep my final reads.

This sounds so scummy right now

also rask read the thread. the whole thing.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1672 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:54 pm

Oh didn't even realize Rask subbed in.

Hey!

Titus · Post Post #1673 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:10 pm

Where did my vote go?

VOTE: Drone

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1674 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:16 pm

titus

ever see yourself voting LUV?