Mini 1857 Mod Topic

mhsmith0 · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:33 pm

I wonder if they'll actually lynch Titus. Would be kinda funny.

JaeReed · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:11 pm

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p8613101

Actually this is kinda funny because I actually did run to double check he was definitely a VT at the post Rask linked.

And yeah it looks like they're definitely lynching a PR today. Which is amusing because LUV lied about his role so if they flip off Titus and onto him he's kind of boned. Titus at least hid how many shots she had, so scum will probably not bother to roleblock her and just go for the flat kill. If gerry protects correctly then she'll have a chance to get a result out. That's if she trusts that there's a doc in the game and they'll be on her. Otherwise she'll have to gamble with the jailkeep.

JaeReed · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:18 pm

*triple checks Titus' iso* yup, that wasn't a mod error. She forgot to vote again xP I was scared I missed it or something.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:24 pm

In post 100, Raskolnikov wrote:when i get a scum role pm daemons come and suck out all my energy

ill post things tomorrow

Try offering them cookies

is what I would have posted in response if I was the mod here lol

JaeReed · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:26 pm

Feel free to post

mhsmith0 · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:27 pm

i will then

mhsmith0 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:29 pm

shit posting in scum/dead thread is one of the fun things about being a mod. also one of the fun things about having day chat

JaeReed · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:44 pm

Yeah I like having my commentaries here and there, but I'm not overly witty

I wish I could offer them a lot more emotional support. Sesq has been doing well to fly under the radar solo for so long here.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:11 pm

In post 117, JaeReed wrote:
In post 113, Raskolnikov wrote:it helps keep morale up... gg unfair advantage ultra scum strat
Don't joke about that! I'm a LITTLE concerned that this might actually be the case! xP

FWIW I feel like the occasional shit posting in scum topic to keep things fun is fine. Then again I generally hate wolfing so I have some sympathy w people stuck with that role.

JaeReed · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:25 pm

Mayyybbbeeee

I still half expect mastina to come in and give me a slap on the wrist whenever I mess around like that though

I feel especially bad for the scum team because I know none of them wanted to roll scum.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:29 pm

I feel like the ultimate goal is to have fun, and advancing that objective is a good thing.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:57 am

In post 120, Raskolnikov wrote:
In post 1734, Titus wrote:I want to lynch you because you're scum, with Shannon and Lil most likely (but Lil is my weakest read). I am dead by nightkill anyway.
titus talking like theres 4 scum

titus town telling

mhsmith0 · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:15 am

In post 122, mastin2 wrote:
In post 100, Raskolnikov wrote:when i get a scum role pm daemons come and suck out all my energy
Geez, what
is
it with you people?

did you like my advice?

mastin2 · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:17 am

I have reasons to approve of cookie-dispensing, yes.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:26 am

JaeReed · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:13 am

Yo Titus I'm really happy for you. I'ma let you finish, but Imp had one of the scummiest day starts of all time! One of the scummiest day starts of ALL time!

This is one of those things that I shouldn't have laughed at as hard as I did. Thanks, TTTT.

JaeReed · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:09 pm

@mod-- Hypothetical question that you may not be able to answer: Are modifiers (if they exist) applied randomly (like roles) or are they mod-assigned to specific roles as part of the setup?

This is a difficult question to figure out if I can answer.

In the case of the neighbours I did randomize. The rest were calculated. I can no comment but I can't see a real reason to do that aside from the fact there's no real truthful answer I can give here without giving away that the neighbour claims are true.

Or I could just say it was all calculated because I DID re-randomize the neighbours the first two times because it ended up with both JOATs the first time and I think doc and goon the second time and I could just see town taking that leap of faith and claiming.

JaeReed · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:10 pm

Huh... I guess they were mod-assigned to an extent then >.> OIAUFKJLS

BUT IT'S NOT THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH AND I AM IN CONFLICT

help? q.q

JaeReed · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:26 pm

Actually neighbours aren't modifiers are they? They're the original role?

mhsmith0 · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:34 pm

Yeah. I'm not sure you need to answer that kind of setup question tho. Also IIRC you'd given us in review a specific setup that we okd (i.e. Specificallynwhich townies were neighbors) so in that sense it wasn't really random?

JaeReed · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:38 pm

I can't see the effect the question should have regardless. If it was random then it could land on the Uni backup anyway. If it was decided then I could very well have decided to put the Uni backup as a neighbour. Unless he's going to try playing "read the mod's personality" which is just plain silly.

Maybe something like "There were no further randomizations other than player to role after the setup was passed by the review team."?

JaeReed · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:45 pm

ok neighbours can be considered modifiers which is why they can be tagged on to existing roles, right. Uhmmmm... Still tempted to go with that ^ but I'm pretty sure that doesn't REALLY answer the question.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:49 pm

Maybe something like

The specific setup was reviewed for normalcy and balance. This includes all roles and any modidifiers that may or may not exist.

JaeReed · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:51 pm

...I'm just c/ping that, that's better than my dodgy answer.

...after I fix the typo ofc

Thanks

mhsmith0 · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:53 pm

Better w typo lol