Spoiler: Scout interactions with parama first 1300 posts
In post 75, inspectorscout wrote:Right. I forgot. Should I buss you now or...In post 72, Parama wrote:In post 69, inspectorscout wrote:But why do you want a partner to manipulate?In post 52, Parama wrote: i'm scum, sup
In post 382, inspectorscout wrote:How about parama?In post 381, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah I don't have good feelings about HS this game regardless
In post 394, inspectorscout wrote:On one side i like their agressiveness but its a bit over the top sometimes.In post 386, Dunnstral wrote:I think parma is fine but they're paired with hs so death may be in their futureIn post 382, inspectorscout wrote:How about parama?In post 381, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah I don't have good feelings about HS this game regardless
I tend to go after groups where I think both members are scum, though, which is why I like having some say in deciding who pairs with who (not like anyone would listen)
= theyre town but slightly rude as well
I think thats a good idea, but im gonna bet on that not working (mainly because of pairs already made)
In post 405, inspectorscout wrote:Telling them you'll policy and WoTC them doesn't help often either imo...In post 401, Parama wrote:if it helps i'm like this every game regardless of my alignmentIn post 382, inspectorscout wrote: On one side i like their agressiveness but its a bit over the top sometimes.
= theyre town but slightly rude as well
i have very little patience but i'm also above outright insulting people for no good reason like shadow is doing
babying people never produces results though
And I know, I don't read people solely on agressiveness as I, too, will be at a point this game where I'm rude and I always have that, as well. It's just not always that much fun to play with.
In post 1098, inspectorscout wrote:Parama town
HS scumlean
Nahdia, can you give your thoughts on MDS?
Not a comprehensive look through at all. I just ctrl + f'd parama so I'm sure he talks to them at other times too but I don't see much suspicion or calling out here.
Spoiler: Same for SAD
In post 122, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Yeah... no. mh is not dodging that garbage opening that quickly.In post 119, Parama wrote:end the setup speculation immediately, jesus christ
In post 152, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Idgaf about setup speculation.In post 143, Parama wrote:@SAD actually stop
I DO give a fuck about people who started with setup speculation.
It really was not a hard setup to read, so anyone trying to make the setup more complicated or start discussing it has huge red flags.
In post 447, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Anyway I'm actually extremely happy with my partner choice.
Parama is reading town. Her interaction with shadow reads genuine and "passionate", which I largely associate to town. Though she's jumping in an abrasive way at things, but who the fuck am I to talk I have an obnoxious playstyle too.
HS is reading town also. Her playstyle largely resembles townie stream-of-consciousness posting. I'm a bit ~paranoid~ of her because if she's scum and can imitate townie thinking this strongly then she will be very hard to take down.
Kagami leaning town for her question to Shadow. I think scum would be much more content with just lurking in the back and letting Shadow getting the boot. And if they are both scum together then I don't think she would word it in such an off-handed way.
Cerb leaning town as I said. I think he has some good genuine posts like the reation to nadhia accepting his dance. He's logical and straightforward in his posts, seems like he truly believes what he's saying. His 295 to Shadow was also extremely townie.
In post 463, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Mhsmith, Shadow, Dunn.In post 452, Parama wrote:@sadboy got any scumreads though lol
Kinda MDS and Vedith? (I'm really really torn on the way MDS is playing)
I want to see one of those first 3 not get a partner.
Admittedly sickofit has like 1 post, but since he's gentlemen I think he would be working harder to get a partner seeing as he could be left in the dust. Whereas take Vedith, who's like guaranteed a partner, she can post a 1 liner and then lurk the rest of pre-dance and coast hardcore af.
In post 535, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Because if a scum pairs up with a largely townie read person people will be more hesitant to lynch the pairing?In post 531, Parama wrote:like literally though what's the benefit of intentionally letting one scum live just to try to get a 2-scum pairing the next day
why not just
kill the scum in pre-dance
In post 1144, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Sooo many posts holy. Like 90% of those were just a mud slinging contest and I'm seriously not sitting through that bullshit every time I come to this thread to catch up.
Here's a quick tier list of where I'm at:
Nahdia
Parama, inspectorscout, Human Sequencer, Cerberus v666
Kagami, pieguyn, MariaR
Gamma Emerald, The_Jester
MiniDeathStar, Dunnstral, mhsmith0
Shadow_step, Vedith
Some notes:
- Need to ISO Jester and Gamma. I MIGHT (mighttttttttttt) be willing to ISO Vedith hundred fucking obnoxious posts.
- MDS's post 888 might be contender for worst single post in the whole thread.
- I like pieguyn right now literally for being logical and coherent in her posts. She could be scum and I would be happy to keep her for now because at least I enjoy reading her posts (as opposed to other people *cough*)
- Parama saying she was going to sleep and she didn't wanna come back to too many posts literally made me wanna punch a wall. Seriously anyone who's town and spamming the thread this much needs to realize they are benefiting scum a lotttttt more than town.
- Dunn seriously has the most posts but prob one of the lowest content in his posts. Being useless in the open to look like he's putting in ~effort~ and being ~helpful~.
In post 1473, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:I already responded to Dunn's question about it:In post 1468, Parama wrote:you're like the second person to really be hating on this post and i'm trying to figure out why, explain this to meIn post 1144, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: - MDS's post 888 might be contender for worst single post in the whole thread.I guess to add to that the whole post just reeks of fencesitting while trying to please and satisfy others.In post 1326, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:I already explained this in the PT, but basically reads very generic and noncontroversial reads. Feels like she went from "Oh people aren't pleased or agreeing with my weird defense of Jester" to "Let me try to please people by having reads others are sharing so it looks like I'm helping to push wagons they want".In post 1250, Dunnstral wrote:Why?In post 1144, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:MDS's post 888 might be contender for worst single post in the whole thread.
Because I totally agree with this btw and voiced as much
Same deal. Posts 463 and 1473 are interesting if SAD is scum.