Open 669 - Nightless Vengeful Mayhem [Game Over]

Revan · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:37 pm

I intent to pressure havingfitz once he catches up, though. He seems really on the fence about everything, and his posts are odd.

Revan · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:39 pm

There's at least 1 scum in {havingfitz, Sesq, Superhans}

doomfeathers · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:41 pm

Friend Computer, could you explain your motivation for voting karnos?

Revan · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:41 pm

Possibly FC too, going to reread ISO now.

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:44 pm

Also @Junko – why were you disagreeing directly with Sesq’s reasoning for scum reading Mozamis and still voting Mozamis as “scum on the Sesq wagon”?

At that time I thought mozamis was scum but not for the same reasons sesq had expressed

Revan · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:45 pm

In post 327, doomfeathers wrote:Friend Computer, could you explain your motivation for voting karnos?

What type of question is this?

FC's ISO is bare. I don't think voting him will change this.

This is the best place for my vote to be.

VOTE: Superhans

doomfeathers · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:46 pm

Unless we can hit the shooter, let's lynch Sesq today. She's very obviously playing against the town wincon.

Revan wrote:
In post 327, doomfeathers wrote:Friend Computer, could you explain your motivation for voting karnos?
What type of question is this?

FC's ISO is bare. I don't think voting him will change this.

It seems odd to me is all. It shows emotional response directed (for some reason) at the mod, and emotional responses can be very telling. It's a reaction to

something

.

mozamis · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:50 pm

In post 331, doomfeathers wrote:It's a reaction to something.

Yes i think that's a bloody good point. I seem to have gone really english lol
But seriously, yeah...i assumed he was mucking about, but as you say, maybe he was pissed off with the mod about something.
Still, unclear i guess. But defintely worth keeping in mind.

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:51 pm

In post 299, Sesq wrote:Unless you're implying nobody townreads me, save for myself of course. Even then I'm starting to think I may have misread my Role PM on accident.

Your attempt to clear yourself through repeated self deprecation has been denied.

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:51 pm

- Junko

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:55 pm

In post 236, Ultimate Despair wrote:Hey cool, now you've shown awareness of the points being raised and have dismissed them as my being pedantic.

Because 39? Not an obvtown post. wgeurts may well be town, but that post wasn't a solid reason for it, and I'm concerned about the fact that you concluded that it was solid cause to townread him.

-M

Mozamis did you think you could get away with ignoring this?

- Junko

doomfeathers · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:55 pm

To be absolutely clear: I think we should lynch Sesq today unless our alternative is the killer. She is blatantly playing against the town wincon.

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:56 pm

In post 308, Superhans wrote:Why would FC or Sesq try and kill Hawk so early in the day when they still have plenty of time to shift the pressure off of themselves without wasting a DK?

The kill on Hawk makes no sense from a logical PoV - hence it must be due to some instinctive response or an emotional reaction. Panic from scum getting wagoned early seems likely here.

- Junko

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:07 pm

State of my reads atm:

I agree with Mukuro that Sesq or FC is likely the daykiller and we should be lynching in there. My townread on Revan has vanished and I think there is a chance he is goon. Mozamis is very likely goon as well.

VOTE: Sesq

I chose Sesq over FC here because I have a stronger read on her. Particularly dislike the "hehe, I'm worthless/an asshole" bit. I don't buy MOI's stuff about caught for wrong reasons but I do buy the stuff where she makes a big townwall as wagon increased. I think thats more likely to be indicative of daykiller panic than FC's lurking/voting mod.

- Junko

mozamis · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:16 pm

In post 323, doomfeathers wrote:Do we have any indicators of who might be not only scum but also the killer?

The only possible clue is the one you picked up on, maybe FC being pissed off with the mod ('cos the mod messed up the day kill or something, whatver).
Since that is gonna be be a world of spec, lets get rid of sesq, who is very very likely scum, and worry about other stuff tomorrow.

doomfeathers · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:17 pm

Care to vote, then? I find it interesting that you have never actually voted this game.

doomfeathers · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:18 pm

Oop, never mind. I did a page search including a colon. Sorry.

mozamis · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:20 pm

In post 335, Ultimate Despair wrote:Mozamis did you think you could get away with ignoring this?

no, i just knew that whoevr it was (you?) had totally missed my point. hang on while i re read.

mozamis · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:24 pm

In post 340, doomfeathers wrote:Care to vote, then? I find it interesting that you have never actually voted this game.

me? you're joking, right?
Prety sure i have had my vote on sesq most (all?) game.

and Ultimate: ask me that question again. i have forgotten what you are talking about.

mozamis · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:24 pm

In post 341, doomfeathers wrote:Oop, never mind. I did a page search including a colon. Sorry.

and lol

mozamis · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:26 pm

In post 236, Ultimate Despair wrote:Because 39? Not an obvtown post.

i think its because i thought that WAS a really fucking town post. and he eother looked really town before, or just after.
whatever. the guy couldnt be more town.

Sesq · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:38 pm

In post 315, Superhans wrote:
In post 301, Sesq wrote:Yes, I was saying I was misrepping you, but after looking back it looked like I had misspoke. My intent was to vote doom for his LAMIST shit but it didn't come across as that.
Are you refering to his questioning of the mechanics of the game before D1 had started?

Yes I am. I have not read past this post yet by the way, so yeah.

Sesq · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:12 pm

In post 331, doomfeathers wrote:Unless we can hit the shooter, let's lynch Sesq today. She's very obviously playing against the town wincon.

Revan wrote:
In post 327, doomfeathers wrote:Friend Computer, could you explain your motivation for voting karnos?
What type of question is this?

FC's ISO is bare. I don't think voting him will change this.
It seems odd to me is all. It shows emotional response directed (for some reason) at the mod, and emotional responses can be very telling. It's a reaction to
something
.

How am I actively playing against town's win condition? Revan's disuasion from analyzing DK is one of the only play I've seen I would identify as overtly anti-town.

Also is that lynch or L-1? Regardless, this game will end up pretty interesting.

Sesq · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:12 pm

I have 0% hope that I'm not somehow getting lynched today. Sorry to be a waste of time to Town, I guess. Is self-hammering allowed? I'd do it right now if possible.

Ultimate Despair · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:18 pm

If you're scum, then self-voting / hammering makes a fair amount of sense, but if you're town you should fight it. If 348 is AtE it's not working, but if you're actually town you should figure out who makes the most sense as scum and push there rather than just give up.
-M