It's a reason. It's my read.In post 319, Tywin Lannister wrote:No, I read it, and it's not a reason to TR the slot.
I haven't misrep'd anything, but I've already shown an example of you misrepping me. You can keep screaming it from the pulpit all day, but Jeebus ain't coming to validate your bs.In post 323, Tywin Lannister wrote:It just so happens that his misreps, shading, and flat out lies were against me.
Do you think everyone is you? My reason is a reason whether you like or agree with it or not.In post 326, Tywin Lannister wrote:I can't fathom how you'd get a read whatsoever on a slot that basically never posted
In post 326, Tywin Lannister wrote:I haven't misrep'd anything
The challenge still stands for you to quote where I said the bs you tried to put in my mouth. Misrep.In post 246, Tywin Lannister wrote:This guy admits to wanting to policy lynch a cop claim, admits to thinking it will flip town
Aren't you voting me? I thought you were leading my lynch.In post 329, Land of Xanth wrote:Sly, the more you try to defend that indefensible excuse for a read on KT, the more I want to lynch you.
I don't care if he is. I want to know how you 'know' this from a player with a grand total of zero non-deleted posts. He's your top TR, and he hasn't even posted yet.In post 332, SlySly wrote:Welcome, Ramcius. Can you please tell Tywin you are town so he can get some shut eye? Thanks in advance.
Why is any of this scummy? Town can do all of these things.In post 301, CommKnight wrote:Let's do a check on all of his posts shall we?
First PostIntroduction post, doesn't count for anything. Nothing of substance.In post 122, Skelda wrote:Hi guys! I didn't realize that the game had started, I'm reading back now.
Second PostShort 2-liner with a vote. Nothing really analyzed, which part of Uzi's posts seemed like they were trying too hard? Like which specific part? Seems like sheeping for the first line of easy reads.In post 123, Skelda wrote:Okay so I totally believe James obviously. I'm not convinced that it is Comm though.
Vote: Uziis where I'm at right now. It seemed like they were trying hard to make their James doubt seem Town.
Third PostSheeps consensus that I'm town now, just basically "I agree". Then his post about Uzi, it's like he's projecting himself unto Uzi because this is his third post and nothing "especially Town" yet! Then casts shade on Tywin because you know, he can't explain why!In post 214, Skelda wrote:Yeah I think James and Comm are Town too. I agree with the people saying that.
Uzi still seems possible I guess, he hasn't done anything especially Town. I could also see it being Tywin for some reason, I'm not sure how to articulate why though.
Fourth PostAgain, he calls someone else out as not doing anything really yet what has he done up to this point? More shading. Still going after Uzi as "desperate" but look at what he's doing. GRASPING AT STRAWS STILL. Yet again, "I agree".In post 264, Skelda wrote:Meh, it could be SlySly. I mean, he hasn't done anything particularly redeeming.
Most scum that I've played with would withdraw in this situation rather than doubling down, so I'm not scumreading him super hard, but it seems possible-ish. I dunno. I can definitely conceive of Town thinking the way that SlySly is, it isn't this super outlandish thing like some of you guys are making it out to be.
I think Xanth is Town and I'm for sure not Townreading Tywin, I'm going to keep my vote on Uzi though. His recent vote on Sly felt a little desperate and like he was just agreeing with what others had said to get off the hook.
Fifth Post100% usless post, expand on why you don't agree.In post 278, Skelda wrote:Not really.In post 270, Land of Xanth wrote:Cautious scum found.In post 264, Skelda wrote:Meh, it could be SlySly. I mean, he hasn't done anything particularly redeeming.
Most scum that I've played with would withdraw in this situation rather than doubling down, so I'm not scumreading him super hard, but it seems possible-ish. I dunno. I can definitely conceive of Town thinking the way that SlySly is, it isn't this super outlandish thing like some of you guys are making it out to be.
So out of 5 posts, first and fifth are fillers and he's done a crud job about doing anything townie as of yet but seems all too willing to call others out for not doing so much. Yet everyone he's called out has been more active and contributed much more to the conversation than he has.
So Tywin, what do you think of this analysis?
Fastposted a few times. Yep, Tywin is the towniest of the lot at the moment.
Posts like this seem like they are trying to project Towniness rather than actually analyze the situation at hand, and plus this seems like an obvious point to go into a lot of effort to explain. Tywin has a couple posts like this that feel like more than is necessary to get his point across. I dunno, I don't really have a super strong scumread on him, but do we have any reason to believe that any thing he's doing here is something he wouldn't do as scum? Not really. And so therefore can we townread him? Not really.In post 185, Tywin Lannister wrote:They both strike me as TvT. Specially, newtown vs newtown. Will look at it more after work, but comm looks new to Mafia based on him thinking his claim there was a good idea, since it doesn't really cc anything. They're both modified cops, although one is a non-consecutive role cop, the other a 1-shot normal cop. They both basically outted themselves without reason. Being a role cop should've told comm to expect things like a scum/town roleblocker, scum/town cop, etc, because there's no point to a role cop over a normal cop otherwise. Usually, town role cops need a reason to search for roles instead of simply guilty/innocent, so I think that should've been common sense to him. Due to that, also having a weak 1-shot cop makes sense and fits balance-wise, especially with the 'time shifted' mechanic in play. I think they're both newtown at this point, and regardless, neither are the correct lynch D1.
The post wasn't deleted. You need to learn to say what you mean, not how you're trying to twist it.In post 334, Tywin Lannister wrote:I want to know how you 'know' this from a player with a grand total of zero non-deleted posts.
I'm confused as to what pattern you're seeing since I've only voted twice so far. What is making you feel like I'm just a sheep?In post 286, Vifam wrote:I could be wrong tho, I don't like Uzi's voting pattern so far based on his sheepness so I wanna go with him
Lot of petty and NAI stuff here. I think you're not thinking about the motivation for any of his actions.In post 301, CommKnight wrote:Let's do a check on all of his posts shall we?
First PostIntroduction post, doesn't count for anything. Nothing of substance.In post 122, Skelda wrote:Hi guys! I didn't realize that the game had started, I'm reading back now.
Second PostShort 2-liner with a vote. Nothing really analyzed, which part of Uzi's posts seemed like they were trying too hard? Like which specific part? Seems like sheeping for the first line of easy reads.In post 123, Skelda wrote:Okay so I totally believe James obviously. I'm not convinced that it is Comm though.
Vote: Uziis where I'm at right now. It seemed like they were trying hard to make their James doubt seem Town.
Third PostSheeps consensus that I'm town now, just basically "I agree". Then his post about Uzi, it's like he's projecting himself unto Uzi because this is his third post and nothing "especially Town" yet! Then casts shade on Tywin because you know, he can't explain why!In post 214, Skelda wrote:Yeah I think James and Comm are Town too. I agree with the people saying that.
Uzi still seems possible I guess, he hasn't done anything especially Town. I could also see it being Tywin for some reason, I'm not sure how to articulate why though.
Fourth PostAgain, he calls someone else out as not doing anything really yet what has he done up to this point? More shading. Still going after Uzi as "desperate" but look at what he's doing. GRASPING AT STRAWS STILL. Yet again, "I agree".In post 264, Skelda wrote:Meh, it could be SlySly. I mean, he hasn't done anything particularly redeeming.
Most scum that I've played with would withdraw in this situation rather than doubling down, so I'm not scumreading him super hard, but it seems possible-ish. I dunno. I can definitely conceive of Town thinking the way that SlySly is, it isn't this super outlandish thing like some of you guys are making it out to be.
I think Xanth is Town and I'm for sure not Townreading Tywin, I'm going to keep my vote on Uzi though. His recent vote on Sly felt a little desperate and like he was just agreeing with what others had said to get off the hook.
Fifth Post100% usless post, expand on why you don't agree.In post 278, Skelda wrote:Not really.In post 270, Land of Xanth wrote:Cautious scum found.In post 264, Skelda wrote:Meh, it could be SlySly. I mean, he hasn't done anything particularly redeeming.
Most scum that I've played with would withdraw in this situation rather than doubling down, so I'm not scumreading him super hard, but it seems possible-ish. I dunno. I can definitely conceive of Town thinking the way that SlySly is, it isn't this super outlandish thing like some of you guys are making it out to be.
So out of 5 posts, first and fifth are fillers and he's done a crud job about doing anything townie as of yet but seems all too willing to call others out for not doing so much. Yet everyone he's called out has been more active and contributed much more to the conversation than he has.
So Tywin, what do you think of this analysis?
Fastposted a few times. Yep, Tywin is the towniest of the lot at the moment.
Why are you asking? If you feel it's the right play, go for it.In post 306, CommKnight wrote:Other inactives/flying below radar currently:
TheFuzzyLogic - 3 posts.
Zekromaster - 2 posts.
Narna - 0 posts.
Harp - 0 posts.
So 5 total out of 17 players have 5 or less posts!!! Anyone want to apply pressure? Prob?
Again, his post was deleted. You're arguing semantics. You know exactly what I meant. Why play coy?In post 337, SlySly wrote:The post wasn't deleted. You need to learn to say what you mean, not how you're trying to twist it.In post 334, Tywin Lannister wrote:I want to know how you 'know' this from a player with a grand total of zero non-deleted posts.
You read me as scum, I would assume that would explain to you how I know things.
Skeld's reads feel like they are coming from laid back town and are probably gut based other than the one on me. I don't get a fake vibe from him and the scum intent in his posts feels practically nonexistent to me.In post 326, Tywin Lannister wrote:@Comm: you give cases the way I do when ISOing someone, although your format it better so people actually read it lol. Anyway, I agree that skald won't take a hard stance on anyone here except TRs. His SRs don't have any reasoning behind them, and he doesn't look to actually believe any of them nearly the same way he does TRs. Since scum already know who town are, that's easy to be genuine there, but SRs aren't if you are faking them. So yeah, I agree. I still think Sly is scummier, and I need to sort peregrine too.
@Sly: saying its a reason doesn't make it one.. Wtf? Stop playing semantics here. It's not alignment indicative, so TRing Kain's slot makes no sense. He's never even posted more than once, and the entire thing was snipped. I didn't see it, but I can't fathom how you'd get a read whatsoever on a slot that basically never posted, let alone your top TR. It makes no sense.
Also, I haven't misrep'd anything, and you going back and forth repeating my words back to me doesn't make it true. What have I misrepresented you with that you've proven? Please show me, because the way I see it, you've talking out of your ass this entire time. You keep repeating that I haven't read the thread as if that somehow will be true just by saying it, ignore most of what I say to cherry pick specific things to deny through semantics over genuine responses, and then you call me the liar for it instead of ever addressing almost any accusation brought to your attention. You're using diversionary tactics. It's pretty obvious. Why?
Click Timeshift Mafia III. Go to page 1. Scroll to Post 8. Who posted it? That's a post that's not deleted. Hmmm, that contradicts what you said. Hate me for dealing in facts.In post 342, Tywin Lannister wrote: Again, his post was deleted. You're arguing semantics. You know exactly what I meant. Why play coy?
I'm not scum. My angle is a town win. I don't have any scum buddies.In post 342, Tywin Lannister wrote: Also, yes, I believe you're scum and the only reason you'd TR a slot that doesn't make any sense to have any read on (other than null) is due to that. I also want to know why you'd be playing the way you are as scum. You're practically admitting it, and I can't figure out why. Is that direct enough for you, or do you want to continue talking about how I should word things differently, even though you fully understand everything I say to you?
Here, let me be even more direct and down to the point for you:
Are you scum?
What's your angle?
Who are your scum buddies?
Here's the post you keep saying didn't happen Sly. You're constantly deflecting, denying, and misdirecting instead of answering legitimately. Those are all scum tactics. You really are one of the scummiest players I've ever seen. I agree with your signature.In post 215, SlySly wrote: Not true.He's a 1-shot cop.He could screw up his one shot.He's not a big loss.If his claim is true and we lynched him, big deal. It would be worth it not to listen to his snippiness for the entire game.I'd be willing to lynch him just so the rest of the game can be fun.
In post 215, SlySly wrote: Not true. He's a 1-shot cop. He could screw up his one shot. He's not a big loss.and we lynched him, big deal. It would be worth it not to listen to his snippiness for the entire game. I'd be willing to lynch him just so the rest of the game can be fun.If his claim is true
The 1-shot part was pointed out to show the difference in what Xanth was saying and what the actual claim was.In post 81, Land of Xanth wrote: Move on from James and find someone else to vote, because the only people with any notice for killing a claimed cop on d1 is Scum.