In post 610, Tywin Lannister wrote:So there's absolutely nothing substatially new being said between my last post Friday night to my latest Sunday night. That's still not 48 hours either, so idk why I was I prodded?
Anyway, here's everything that's happened in the past 2 days: Sly keeps being scummy on purpose (seriously, wtf?), Fuzzy says his lynch is fine, Ram wants to policy lynch fuzzy for it, hark I forgot what his stance was and am too lazy to reread it, Kyouko SRs hark for his stance that I forgot, LoX SRs Sly, Vifam hasn't said anything game related, I forgot the other half of the player pool for being inactives, peregrinV I quoted below, Uzi TRs everyone apparently, James wants Sly to claim, and everyone else is still pretty much still inactive. Who'd I forget? I'm on phone so can't go back to read without this getting deleted, but that's about everything anyways.
I will say that if I got prodded (assuming it wasn't a mistake), then that means half the game is about to be replaced.
@PeregrineV:
In post 450, PeregrineV wrote: In post 323, Tywin Lannister wrote:@peregrin: okay so calling half my case on Sly OMGUS is still different than saying everything I said boils down to OMGUS. That's not true, because I don't vote someone I don't think is scum, and the definition of OMGUS in MS's own wiki is: OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.
1. Sly isn't voting me
2. I've clearly stated why I SR him. It just so happens that his misreps, shading, and flat out lies were against me.
So again: why do you ignore the actual case and everything both he and I have said, and instead try to discredit my CASE/SR using a buzzword that doesn't fit? Do you TR Sly, and if so, why? If not, why are you defending him? He seems pretty capable of handling himself here.
1. Spirit of OMGUS - (you scumread him for him scumreading you)
2. I guess when you confront him about those misreps, shading, and lies, I'll eagerly read both of your posts thoroughly.
I null-read Sly, because of my experience playing him in past games. Time will tell, I suppose.
I'm mostly trying to get a read off of you, because there is a sense of activity from you, but it's not seeming to reach the conclusions I expected.
1. Fine. I don't really care enough to argue this point beyond saying I don't agree that it fits. It looked like a buzzword being thrown around as a chainsaw instead of you actually believing it, but I'm not gonna push something that I can't prove.
2. You don't think I already have? I'm kind of wondering if you read any of it? Also, why haven't you asked him yourself if my questions aren't getting all the answers you wanted to see? Why would you eagerly wait for others to post questions/thoughts instead of doing it yourself?
3. What was your experience of him in past games? Did he look as scummy in those games as he does here, and what did he flip? I'm guessing you've seen him act scummy in both town and scum alignments for you to null read him here? Has this read been updated at all since his latest string of posts, or do you hold firm to the null stance?
4. What conclusions were you expecting me to reach? I'm curious as to what those are. You seem to want to direct me somewhere by the tone of multiple posts directed at me, but where, and why? Do you have specific players you SR that you want me to SR as well, or what are you saying about me 'not reaching the expected conclusions?' Why not just say it instead of trying to nudge me there?