So you meta'd me and think I don't look like my scum game, but you also don't think I look like my town game (though you don't seem to really have a scumread on me here anyway)In post 698, borkjerfkin wrote:from his scum game there i dont really think he looks like this game here or any of the town games i read, tbh.
the reason I caught Dunn in the dance game was because eventually I realized his reads were just really bad and shallow. tonally, this Dunn is different, but outside of his tone, I have similar concerns about his reads here, so... /shrugIn post 697, borkjerfkin wrote:how does pie feel about dunn meta, considering the fakegod game they both recently got out of?
If we don't lynch SS, I may have a solution to this.In post 706, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I don't agree that Persi's soft claim is reason to give him another day; it is absurdly easy for scum to just vaguely claim "my role makes me town tomorrow" and then claim something along the lines of "herp derp I was roleblocked".
omgus, pretty much. But that's not a bad thingIn post 702, Seiko x Naomi wrote:the reason I caught Dunn in the dance game was because
AJ needs to clarify this because this is way, way different from the kind of shit he was saying about me before.In post 558, Aj The Epic wrote:If I thought you were making up a read on me, I'd be voting you because you'd be scum, Pie. Your read that I was tunneling TOB was garbage, not made up. There's a distinction there. And that distinction unfortunately wrecks like 90% of your points. Specifically you wondering why I'm voting OA over you shouldn't really be a point anyways (OA's response was in a different dimension of bad, considering he decided to be unreasonable with me after seemingly deciding to explain himself first). Yeah I'mma fight your "Aj's tunneling TOB" statement. What kinda tunnel goes "Yeah I have nothing more to address with TOB for now" after two or three posts? For the basis of your read on me, it seems pretty self-explanatory why I think that read is atrocious.
I don't really know what to say to this. I disagree on principle with any kind of "let a scum read get to night phase because night actions will sort them out", because there are just too many things that can go wrong with night actions and in a role madness setup it's pointless to even attempt to enumerate and plan around them.In post 708, borkjerfkin wrote:If we don't lynch SS, I may have a solution to this.In post 706, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I don't agree that Persi's soft claim is reason to give him another day; it is absurdly easy for scum to just vaguely claim "my role makes me town tomorrow" and then claim something along the lines of "herp derp I was roleblocked".
That might be true. Too much info has leaked on Day 1 for this to be that foolproof.In post 715, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I don't really know what to say to this. I disagree on principle with any kind of "let a scum read get to night phase because night actions will sort them out", because there are just too many things that can go wrong with night actions and in a role madness setup it's pointless to even attempt to enumerate and plan around them.
The thing I am wary about is all he is saying is that he'll be able to prove he's a role that tends to go to town (much) more than scumIn post 714, Dunnstral wrote:There's no reason to lynch persivul if he has the ability to make himself obvious town.
Why do we have to lynch persivul today, anyway? Who cares if it's not foolproof, he wasn't even set to be lynched when he said itIn post 718, borkjerfkin wrote:The thing I am wary about is all he is saying is that he'll be able to prove he's a role that tends to go to town (much) more than scumIn post 714, Dunnstral wrote:There's no reason to lynch persivul if he has the ability to make himself obvious town.
that's not exactly foolproof
He wasn't under pressureIn post 720, borkjerfkin wrote:'set to be lynched'?