where did I say I care about you being able to see it?In post 3872, JaeReed wrote:For knowing his role and mentioning that there could be a vanillaizer?In post 3870, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm conftown for something else related to him
I see no reason that makes you conftown at all. It's a case of too much information and if you're scum that just comes from knowing your buddies role and trying to get towncred from knowing what happened.
I missed this questionIn post 3874, JaeReed wrote:@FA how is the baby and you btw?
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
pings from the creature!In post 3877, Creature wrote:Was I replaced?
I think they're Scum for several reasons.
What possible reason would a player have to cover for an SK?In post 3825, The DEO wrote:
What is more likely is Drealmerz is SK and mhsmith is covering it up.
~~Math
What points to Zefiend?In post 3827, The DEO wrote:The missing kill was likely killing zefiend. Til someone can explain N2 where someone besides zefiend was shot I have no interest in a zefiend lynch.
~~Math
That doesn't answer my question.In post 3881, Klingoncelt wrote:I think they're Scum for several reasons.
Do you think that Titus/math saying something ridiculous is scum-indicative for them? I would say it's town indicative for Titus as long as it comes w conviction; I admit to not knowing math well enough to say on that end.In post 3882, Klingoncelt wrote:What possible reason would a player have to cover for an SK?In post 3825, The DEO wrote:
What is more likely is Drealmerz is SK and mhsmith is covering it up.
~~Math
Why haven't you & Titus been lynched yet?
Yes. I think their vote is Scummy.In post 3884, Postie wrote:That doesn't answer my question.In post 3881, Klingoncelt wrote:I think they're Scum for several reasons.
Bingo!In post 3885, mhsmith0 wrote:Do you think that Titus/math saying something ridiculous is scum-indicative for them? I would say it's town indicative for Titus as long as it comes w conviction; I admit to not knowing math well enough to say on that end.In post 3882, Klingoncelt wrote:What possible reason would a player have to cover for an SK?In post 3825, The DEO wrote:
What is more likely is Drealmerz is SK and mhsmith is covering it up.
~~Math
Why haven't you & Titus been lynched yet?
This has happened in the past 6 days. On Day 4. You can easily ISO them and get the post numbers yourself, but this far along in the game there's no reason to play hopscotch with one's votes.In post 3887, Alisae wrote:You make it sound bad but you don't actually give the post number of when they actually switched their votes.
That's the one thing givin me pause at this point. I remember seeing some stuff earlier this game where it looked like one or the other was doing the kind of tunneling I expect. I'll dig and verify... but probably nit till Saturday because smith lazyIn post 3889, Klingoncelt wrote:Bingo!In post 3885, mhsmith0 wrote:Do you think that Titus/math saying something ridiculous is scum-indicative for them? I would say it's town indicative for Titus as long as it comes w conviction; I admit to not knowing math well enough to say on that end.In post 3882, Klingoncelt wrote:What possible reason would a player have to cover for an SK?In post 3825, The DEO wrote:
What is more likely is Drealmerz is SK and mhsmith is covering it up.
~~Math
Why haven't you & Titus been lynched yet?
as long as it comes w conviction!
In this case it does not. She's just throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. There's NO conviction, NO trademark deathtunnel.
Are you spazzing out because I'm after your Scum buddy?In post 3890, Alisae wrote:And you know what would be a lot of moving around? This.
VOTE: JaeReed
VOTE: Postie
VOTE: The DEO
VOTE: Creature
VOTE: No Lynch
VOTE: Frozen Angel
VOTE: Mhsmith0
VOTE: Alisae
VOTE: Klingoncelt
VOTE: Zefield
VOTE: drealmersz7
VOTE: boring
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
UNVOTE:
No. Unless you're Scum, vote for DEO.In post 3893, Postie wrote:Can we just lynch zefiend
Protip: Never argue with me when I know that I'm right.In post 3894, Alisae wrote:So thinking about the game is bad? Good to know.
You're misrepping them, because they aren't really vote hopping otherwise they would be jumping at a lot more then just 4 people.
